Archive for December, 2004

Markets take a downturn

Saturday, December 4th, 2004

HOUSING TRENDS I While average price increased, sales declined for fourth consecutive month

Petti Fong
Sun

 

Real estate sales plummet
Detached-home sales volume plunged in November compared to the same time last year in Greater Vancouver and the Fraser Valley
 

Real-estate sales plummeted in the Lower Mainland last month with sales falling 20 per cent in Greater Vancouver and 25 per cent in the Fraser Valley.

It was the fourth straight month of decline in the housing market. While the average price increased, there were declines in sales in most areas.

Detached-home sales fell by 20.2 per cent in Greater Vancouver, while in the Fraser Valley they dropped by 25 per cent.

According to Multiple Listings Service data, apartment sales fell 17.4 per cent and attached property sales fell 10.9 per cent in Greater Vancouver compared to a year ago.

In the Fraser Valley, sales of residential properties were down 15 per cent overall.

Representatives from both the Fraser Valley and Greater Vancouver real-estate boards said despite the declines, sales remain strong compared to a record pace set last year.

Real-estate sales continue to be one of the key drivers in the provincial economy, according to Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver president Andrew Peck.

Sales volume has “trickled down” every month for the last four months, said Fraser Valley Real Estate Board president Moss Moloney on Friday.

“But the price of real estate hasn’t dropped,” he said. “It’s a better opportunity now for buyers, and sellers are still getting good dollars for their listings.”

Sally Broadbent, both a seller and a buyer, dropped out of the market in the spring, when buying was too frenzied.

The East Vancouver resident said she looked in April and May when the market was at its peak.

“The prices were really high and nothing we were interested in was coming on the market,” Broadbent said Friday.

“We started looking again in October and the difference was huge. We had more time. There was not the same urgency to buy or lose out.”

Broadbent said if she had sold her East Vancouver home in April, she probably would have received $20,000 more than the eventual selling price she got in October. In North Vancouver, where the family is moving, the house purchased came down by $10,000 from its asking price.

Lorne Goldman, the Broadbent family’s realtor, said Friday the current market remains strong.

“The spring conditions were unsustainable,” Goldman said of the frantic buying sprees earlier this year when property sales shattered records. “In one case, I had 17 offers on one listing. That level of activity cannot continue.”

In Fraser Valley, which includes Surrey, White Rock and North Delta, unit sales went from 769 sold in November 2003 to 612 sold last month, a 25-per-cent drop.

Average prices for single family homes in the Fraser Valley, at $351,996, were up 10.1 per cent over the year, and declined two per cent from October.

In Greater Vancouver, a typical detached home was $489,430, down from the three month average of $498,903, but up 8.9 per cent from the year before.

Independent mortgage broker Linda Wickstrom said housing prices aren’t dropping, but reflect a more realistic portrait of what buyers and sellers can afford.

“It’s more back to the level of a real market and that makes everyone much more comfortable,” she said Friday.

Five-year fixed mortgage rates remain steady at 4.84 per cent, similar to the rates buyers could get earlier this year for the same term.

Market analyst Robyn Adamche, with Canada Mortgage Housing Corporation, said buyers are no longer in the market just because interest rates are near historic lows.

“While mortgage is still a factor, they are starting to creep up. It remains an important driver, but it’s not the only driver now,” she said.

Since the beginning of the year, Adamche said the economy improved, more people moved to B.C. and the employment picture stabilized.

“That’s all contributing to a more stable growth in the market based on basic fundamentals. We’re seeing a much more sustainable growth.”

CMHC considers a market to be balanced when 18 to 22 per cent of all listings are sold in a month.

While exact numbers are not made public, Adamche said the ratio in October, the last month calculated, was near the high end of a balanced market.

In contrast, when the market was at its most frenzied in March, that ratio was 54 per cent.

For the end of the year, CMHC calculates total sales will be down one per cent overall from the historic 13-per-cent increase in 2003.

Prices will increase on average for this year by 17 per cent for detached homes in Greater Vancouver and 15 per cent for apartments and townhouses, Adamche said.

© The Vancouver Sun 2004

Real estate takes a breather

Friday, December 3rd, 2004

It’s going through an adjustment — not a correction, experts say

Derrick Penner
Sun

 

Source: Credit Union Central of B.C. VANCOUVER SUN

B.C.’s hot housing market has cooled more quickly than expected, which should hold sales, housing starts and the Lower Mainland’s average prices below 2004’s torrid highs throughout 2005, Credit Union Central of B.C. said Thursday.

Credit Union Central chief economist Helmut Pastrick said with October property sales in the Lower Mainland down 30 per cent from the March peak, he believes the market is going through an adjustment, but not an outright correction.

“The amount of new [housing] supply that’s coming on: new listings, newly constructed product, probably hasn’t surged as much,” Pastrick said.

“It’s more of a decline in those monthly sales numbers that are responsible for the market downshift.”

Pastrick adjusted his expectation for total property sales in the province down to 96,000 from the 102,600 estimate he made in June.

He is also projecting that 2005 sales will reach 94,800 and that 2005 housing starts will hit 31,600, which is slightly below the 32,400 units expected to be built in 2004.

Pastrick has also estimated that the average price for a house in B.C. will creep up to $289,700 in 2005 from $286,200, although he expects Vancouver’s average 2005 price to slip to $370,000 from $375,000 and the Fraser Valley’s average to slide to $285,000 from $290,000.

B.C.’s real estate market will still perform well, he added.

It will just “be more of a sideways market, if you will.”

Tsur Somerville, director of the centre for urban economics and real estate at the University of B.C.’s Sauder School of Business, said the dampening of the market also reflects growing uncertainty in the economy.

He said economic stories in recent weeks have been more negative than positive.

The rising dollar has made it more expensive for American investors to pour money into buying condominiums in downtown Vancouver.

The dollar, which dropped 0.75 of a cent to 83.73 cents US Thursday, also hurts B.C.’s export industries such as forestry, mining and tourism.

“When we’re talking about commodities, forestry and tourism, that’s a big piece [of the economy],” Somerville said.

“Growth in the underlying economy is not as strong as people have forecast it to be and that has implications for real estate,” he said.

“When you enter a period of uncertainty, you’re going to see fewer transactions and fewer starts.”

However, Gordon Maroney, president of the B.C. Real Estate Association, said he still believes underlying confidence in the province’s real estate market is strong.

He said the market decline that started after its May peak was predictable.

In 2004 rising consumer confidence met falling mortgage rates while there was still pent-up demand for housing following several years when the real estate industry was in the doldrums.

“So we had a huge surge of purchasers who wanted to buy starting last July to the end of May this year,” Maroney said.

“We’ve said for months…that the market could not continue.”

Carol Frketich, regional economist for Canada Mortgage and Housing, said the high dollar and uncertainty over exports will dampen growth, but only by a matter of degree.

She said that instead of seeing 20-per-cent growth in housing starts, as there was in 2004, she expects to see two-per-cent growth.

And the factors that drove the real estate boom — low mortgage rates, rising employment, consumer confidence and in-migration — will continue into 2005.

“I’m saying the fundamentals are still there for growth,” Frketich said.

Pastrick said he expects housing starts to dip slightly in 2005 because so many condominium projects were started in 2004 to beat increased development charges by the City of Vancouver.

“That borrowed from the future,” he said.

Pastrick said the affordability of B.C. housing did decline in 2004, but not to a level that can be associated with previous market turnarounds.

He also does not believe that the current softening of the market raises concerns that housing prices have become a bubble about to pop.

Pastrick points to the level of real estate speculation — flipping properties after owning them less than six months. He said data showed that in October only four per cent of sales were properties held less than six months.

That compares with 10 per cent in 1989 — 1990 and 20 per cent in 1980 –1981.

In his housing forecast, Pastrick predicted the rental vacancy rate will decline due to the slowdown in the real estate sales market. Renters will simply stay put.

He added that net migration to the province will also add to rental demand.

In his forecast, Pastrick noted that markets such as Kamloops, the Kootenays, Powell River and South Okanagan have not seen sales fall over the last six months.

Still, he predicts all markets except the Okanagan, South Okanagan, the northeast and Chilliwack to show slight declines.

Pastrick said if 2005 provincial economic growth exceeds his estimate of three per cent and the Bank of Canada cuts its key lending rate — which will hold mortgage rates down — he concedes real estate sales could rocket up again.

Pastrick said a rise in mortgage rates from April to June triggered the sales decline.

Mortgage rates have dipped again and he expects November real estate sales figures will show the market has “firmed up.”

“If not [November], then December and January,” he added.

© The Vancouver Sun 2004

Pared-down RAV approved

Thursday, December 2nd, 2004

Board votes 8-4 to go ahead with $1.72b project

Frank Luba
Province

A trimmed-down RAV line was approved yesterday, despite stiff opposition at a rancorous TransLink meeting. A crowd of about 200 people, mostly opposed to the already over-budget line, filled the Croatian Cultural Centre in Vancouver as directors voted 8-4 to go ahead. The 19.5-kilometre rail link from downtown Vancouver to the airport and Richmond, with a $1.72-billion price tag, is one of the most expensive projects in B.C.’s history. The board was also split over the project’s overall cost. While pro-RAV board members contend the recent decision to lengthen the amortization period from 20 to 30 years won’t affect the project’s overall price tag, anti-RAV forces argue the move will add a further $190 million in financing costs. TransLink chairman Doug McCallum said it’ll cost more to pay it off over a longer period but during that time TransLink will collect additional revenues, resulting in little significant difference. “It costs you more in the end but you also don’t have to come up with the capital,” McCallum said. “It’s too complicated to explain.” But anti-RAVer Burnaby Mayor Derek Corrigan said the $190 million increases the $1.72-billion price tag. He said the initial 20-year amortization period should have been kept. “I think it’s one of those quick fixes that came in because they were too far over budget on RAV and they had to find a way to balance the expenses against the capital they were spending,” Corrigan said. In favour were Surrey Mayor McCallum, Surrey Coun. Marvin Hunt, Langley City Mayor Marlene Grinnell, Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie, Coquitlam Mayor Jon Kingsbury, North Vancouver City Mayor Barbara Sharp, Vancouver Mayor Larry Campbell and Vancouver Coun. Raymond Louie. Opposed were Vancouver Coun. David Cadman, Burnaby’s Corrigan, New Westminster Mayor Wayne Wright and Pitt Meadows Mayor Don MacLean. When the bid by SNC-Lavalin/Serco came in $343 million higher than budgeted, extra costs were transferred to TransLink, a station was dropped in Richmond and the B.C. government kicked in another $65 million. McCallum denied taxpayers are getting less and paying more. “I don’t agree with that,” he said. “I have said from Day 1 that the cost of it will come in between $1.5 [billion] and $1.7 billion. It has come in to that.” McCallum said the region will get “first-class mass transportation that’s environment-friendly.” “I think this region, being on the edge of the Asia economy boom, certainly needs that type of transportation or transit system that will allow people to get out of their cars and will allow our country to get along better,” he added Even as the debate wound down, both sides continued to fire salvos and spin their messages. Corrigan, an opponent of the secrecy-cloaked private-public partnership required by the province, noted the reworked RAV deal won’t include turnstiles at stations to stop fare evasion. But Campbell shot back: “This is an open process,” meaning items like turnstiles can be included and paid for through economic avenues yet to present themselves. “We simply won’t know [how],” he added. University of B.C. transportation and urban planning expert Michael Goldberg called it an “excellent” decision. “The single most important thing that’s needed to make it work is there’s got to be significant rezoning around every station, not just of RAV but of the Millennium Line and the Expo Line,” said Goldberg. – – – WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? – A final contract has yet to be signed by SNC-Lavalin/Serco and RAVCO, the TransLink subsidiary overseeing the project. TransLink chairman Doug McCallum said the deal will likely be signed in the spring. “We’ve already done some drilling and so forth, but we’ll start the majority of construction next year sometime,” said McCallum. – RAVCO will be TransLink’s watchdog on the project to ensure it stays on time and on budget. “We’ve got an agreement in the best-and-final-offer from SNC-Lavalin on the prices and so forth,” said McCallum. “That’s what we voted on today — $1.72 billion.” – Construction is to be completed by Nov. 30, 2009, so the line can be running before the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver and Whistler beginning Feb. 12. © The Vancouver Province 2004

RAV line gets final approval, construction to start in 2005

Thursday, December 2nd, 2004

TransLink directors vote 8-4 in favour after raucous debate

William Boei
Sun

CREDIT: Ian Smith, Vancouver Sun After Pitt Meadows Mayor Don McLean (left) called some of the directors unethical, an irritated Vancouver Mayor Larry Campbell (right) got hot under the collar.

TransLink gave final approval Wednesday to the controversial Richmond-Airport-Vancouver rapid transit line, which is slated to begin construction next year and planned for completion by late 2009 in time for the 2010 Olympic Games.

After twice rejecting the $1.72-billion project and conditionally approving it in a third vote, TransLink directors gave it a final “yes” by an 8-4 margin.

“I think we’ve done the right thing,” Vancouver Mayor Larry Campbell said after a raucous debate that saw some TransLink directors calling others unethical and Campbell apparently getting furiously angry with his Pitt Meadows counterpart, Don MacLean.

“I think that 100 years from now this will be seen as visionary,” Mayor Campbell said.

In Victoria, Premier Gordon Campbell predicted RAV will make Vancouver a more livable city in the future.

“It’s going to take 10 lanes of traffic out of the commute,” the premier said. “It’s going to take hundreds of thousands of pounds of pollutants out of the airshed. It’s going to move people faster around the region.”

However, some directors and transit lobbyists feared the RAV line will drain money from the bus fleet and other transportation priorities.

“I’ve been trying to kill this blood-sucking vampire for some time, unsuccessfully,” Burnaby Mayor Derek Corrigan said, conceding that his long battle against the project was finally lost.

The RAV line will run from Vancouver‘s Waterfront Station under the downtown, False Creek and Cambie Street as far south as 63rd Avenue, where it will emerge to run on an elevated concrete guideway similar to SkyTrain’s. It will cross a new bridge over the Fraser River and split into two branches at Bridgeport, one to Richmond Centre and the other to the airport.

It will be built and operated by a consortium headed by

Montreal-based engineering and construction giant SNC-Lavalin.

Construction is expected to begin late next year and take five years, for a completion date in late 2009 — in time for the 2010 Winter Olympic Games. SNC-Lavalin will then operate the line for 25 years.

TransLink will collect the fares and give the operator annual performance payments.

The $1.72-billion budget is to be covered by $450 million from the federal government; $300 million each from TransLink and the airport authority; $300 million originally promised by the provincial government plus $63 million added by Victoria this week; $206 million from SNC-Lavalin, and $101 million in additional revenue TransLink says it can drum up from the line’s operations.

The fate of the project has hung in the balance since last spring, putting immense pressure on TransLink directors.

North Vancouver City Mayor Barbara Sharp, who cast one of two swing votes that finally guaranteed the project, said she found a threatening note on her car after one contentious board meeting this summer.

Sharp said she knows who left the note, but has decided to take no action.

The vote was closer than it sounds. If the swing votes — cast by Sharp and Vancouver Coun. Raymond Louie — had gone the other way, the vote would have been lost on a 6-6 tie and the RAV line would have been condemned to death for a third and final time.

Premier Campbell said taxpayers will not be asked to contribute anything more to the project.

“That’s it, kaputski, done,” he said. “That’s one of the great advantages of this deal. Any overruns are going to be picked up by the private sector.”

But Corrigan and other opponents emphasized that TransLink will bear the cost of any ridership shortfalls on the new line and argued that its projected daily ridership of 100,000 people is unrealistic. About 40,000 people a day now commute by bus through the Cambie corridor.

“You and your children and your children’s children will be paying for this project for decades,” Corrigan told about 150 people who showed up at the Croatian Cultural Centre in East Vancouver to witness the final RAV debate.

Even without additional costs, the RAV line and other regional transportation projects are expected to add about $59 to the average homeowner’s property taxes, increasing the transit levy to about $145 per household. The RAV portion totals about $15 per year.

Corrigan predicted a tax revolt when those bills arrive in mailboxes, and said seniors on fixed incomes may be forced to sell their homes.

MacLean, who also opposed the RAV line, said its cost will prevent other transit projects from being built.

“If you’re from the North Shore, if you’re from Richmond, if you’re from Langley and think that it’s going to be your turn shortly, it isn’t going to happen,” he said. “This is sucking every bit of money out of the system.”

MacLean attacked directors who had previously called for a $1.35-billion cap on public money sunk into the RAV line, but then supported it even though the cap was exceeded.

He said those directors “should be held to account” and went on to note “there is a shortage of ethical politicians.”

Campbell blew up, his face red with anger. “I refuse to be referred to as unethical by the mayor of Pitt Meadows,” he said.

MacLean said he was talking about “politicians all over this country” who make spending decisions.

He apologized to any TransLink directors who were offended. Campbell said later he had talked to MacLean and the two had settled their differences.

“He’s a good guy and I like him,” the Vancouver mayor said.

Sharp and Louie, who both opposed the project earlier, said they had actually saved the RAV line by pushing through a motion forcing it to come back to TransLink for one more vote if it exceeded the $1.35-billion public spending cap.

They said they intended to give the board one more chance to pare the budget and come up with more revenue, and that’s what happened.

“I didn’t want to see a huge cost increase and lose control [of] the final decision,” Sharp said. “That motion is the only reason we’re even here today.”

Louie said the RAV line will be good for 100 years of service and will become a valuable revenue source for other transit projects once the 25-year operating contract with SNC-Lavalin expires.

“This is an opportunity we should not let slide away,” he said.

Also voting for the RAV line was Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie, who had threatened to oppose it when the winning bid included an elevated guideway through Richmond instead of the at-grade light-rail system Richmond preferred.

Brodie kept one more option open when the TransLink board agreed to let Richmond study whether the line could run along Minoru Boulevard instead of the planned route of No. 3 Road.

TransLink chairman and Surrey Mayor Doug McCallum and Surrey Coun. Marvin Hunt also voted for the RAV line, as did Langley City Mayor Marlene Grinnell.

New Westminster Mayor Wayne Wright voted against, saying, “I can’t support it. It’s overpriced.”

Vancouver Coun. David Cadman, also opposed, said there was too much secrecy in the procurement process because of the public-private partnership approach. He blamed the province.

“The provincial government has an interest in one thing and one thing only — a line to Richmond, and it must be a public-private partnership or there will be no money from the provincial government and no [provincial] assistance getting money from the federal government,” Cadman said.

Directors were not allowed to tell the public how much expense TransLink will shoulder to move existing trolley wires and add new ones along the Cambie corridor because of confidentiality, he said. Nor could they disclose how much the design and construction of new bus loops will cost.

As part of the budget-paring, TransLink also agreed to pay for the project’s operating insurance, and Cadman said that was “like insuring your neighbour’s car. We’re insuring something that we have no control over.”

Earlier, the TransLink board heard from about 30 members of the public, many of them members of lobby groups. They opposed the RAV line by a margin of about 10 to one.

One of them, Chris Spannos, told the board SNC-Lavalin is part of another consortium that manufactures ammunition for U.S. forces in Iraq. He wanted TransLink to tell SNC-Lavalin it should withdraw from that project or be disqualified from bidding on the RAV line.

Two Vancouver councillors, Anne Roberts and Fred Bass, also appeared before the board to oppose the RAV line, again highlighting a deep split in Vancouver‘s ruling Coalition of Progressive Electors.

“No matter how you slice and dice these figures, this project is over budget,” Roberts said.

“It’s not affordable, it never has been, and it doesn’t make sense.”

She said it will take money away from the bus system that is the backbone of Greater Vancouver’s transportation system.

So did Bass, who predicted the bus system will be weakened so much that many commuters will go back to driving to work.

Shaw offers new online virus protection

Thursday, December 2nd, 2004

Gillian Shaw
Sun

Shaw Internet subscribers will have a new set of tools to defend their computers against viruses and other attacks with the company’s announcement Wednesday of a new online security package.

Wrapping up anti-virus and firewall protection with parental control, spam control, a pop-up blocker and anti-spyware, Shaw Communications is offering the service on a six-month free trial to current customers and new subscribers.

After six months, the service will cost $4.95 a month. The monthly fee covers up to three computers, so home users who might have had to install security software on each machine can get coverage for three under a single subscription. The service will also be available to Shaw business Internet customers.

Shaw customers and new subscribers can sign up at start.shaw.ca starting today.

“Security concerns are on the minds of virtually every Internet user, and we want our customers to be able to use the Internet confidently and securely,” Peter Bissonnette, president of Shaw Communications said in a release announcing the product. “This new service is embedded in our Internet product and will be constantly updated to give our customers the peace of mind they’re looking for.”

The security service checks for virus updates hourly and provides information and descriptions of new and emerging viruses.

The service follows the rollout earlier this year of the company’s E-mail filter. According to company statistics, some 145 million of the 267 million e-mail messages that arrived at Shaw’s Internet data centre in October were identified as spam and tagged or deleted by the filter. The e-mail filter is built into the new security system which is being supplied by F-Secure.

© The Vancouver Sun 2004

Spyware replaces worms or viruses as No.1 threat

Thursday, December 2nd, 2004

Province

The wild world of Internet surfing is more dangerous than ever, due to a greater prevalence of malicious hacking, says IBM spokesman Pete Sturm.

But Sturm says that “spyware” — rather than worms or viruses — has become the No. 1 threat to be feared by those navigating the information highway.

“It’s mostly spyware now that I see people having trouble with,” said Sturm.

“Browser hijackers, tracking cookies to see what sites you visit — that’s more prevalent right now.”

Sturm said that, more than ever, individuals have to exercise the utmost care in their online habits to avoid having their computer compromised.

He offered several bits of advice:

– If you’re in the Windows world, and 90 per cent of users are, make sure you’ve installed Microsoft’s Service Pack 2 update package to take advantage of security fixes.

– Make sure your computer has antivirus software, and always keep it up to date.

Sturm said IBM’s security team is still seeing activity from viruses as old as CodeRed and Nimda, which first appeared three years ago.

– Install a firewall for your home-computer network, especially if you use an always-on connection like broadband or DSL. Malicious hackers are constantly scanning for home systems they can hijack.

– If you use WiFi hotspots to connect with the Internet with your laptop, make sure it has a firewall.

– Never respond to unsolicited e-mail. The Unsubscribe function on a spam e-mail can redirect you unknowingly to a malicious website that downloads a virus on your PC.

– Use passwords that aren’t easily guessed. About 40 per cent of computer users use the word “password’ as their password. Go for longer passwords, of at least seven or eight characters and mix in numbers.

– Back up your important files regularly.

© The Vancouver Province 2004

BC housing market has yet to peak

Thursday, December 2nd, 2004

There’s good news for renters in recent survey, too

Ashley Ford
Province

 

B.C.’s hyperactive housing market will start to chill out next year but it will only be temporary, Credit Union Central of B.C. says in its latest housing survey being released today.

Helmut Pastrick, Central’s chief economist, says market activity in B.C. will stay robust but at a slightly lower level and under weaker market conditions than this year.

However, Pastrick stops short of saying the current market cycle has peaked.

“Based on the available evidence, and more importantly on the expected performance of key sales drivers, this is likely not the long-awaited market-cycle peak.”

But he does say the “shift during the past few months from a seller’s market to a balanced market is substantial.”

“Prices have slowed considerably and have declined in some instances as a result of recent weaker sales. In 2005, average sales prices will post only a small gain,” said Pastrick.

After the large price increases that have been going on since 2000, more potential purchasers are holding off with the deterioration in affordability, he says.

“Housing sales are predicted to firm during the course of 2005. However, it is unlikely the market will see a return to the tight conditions that existed in the early-2003 to early-2004 period,” he added.

Sales next year are expected to fall slowly to 94,800 from this year’s 98,000 but prices will still edge up to an average provincial price of $289,700 compared with $286,200 this year.

Slightly lower housing starts next year are forecast as multiple-unit housing starts decline after a strong run-up in 2004. Total starts are projected to reach 31,600 compared with this year’s 32,400.

Single-family starts will rise to 15,500 compared with this year’s 14,300 with multiple-starts declining to 16,100 from 18,100.

The renovation sector, however, is expected to stay extremely strong with spending rising to $4.1 billion next year from this year’s $3.8 billion.

There is good news for renters.

Soft rental-markets conditions are expected to prevail next year with rental increases staying below the level of inflation.

Regional housing-market conditions vary with most of the expected sales, price and starts adjustments occurring in the Lower Mainland area.

Interior housing markets have shown more strength in 2004 and that is projected to extend into 2005.

© The Vancouver Province 2004

 

BC housing spending up 25 per cent from 2003

Thursday, December 2nd, 2004

Buyers across the province pumped $2.6 billion into real estate in third quarter

Derrick Penner
Sun

 

Source: Statistics Canada

 

British Columbians poured $2.6 billion into residential real estate investment in the third quarter of 2004, Statistics Canada reported Wednesday.

The figure is a 25-per-cent increase from the same period in 2003.

In its release Statistics Canada said the substantial increase was due largely to heavy demand for new housing, though experts point to increasing housing costs as another driver.

“I would say [Statistics Canada’s findings] are consistent with what we’re seeing in new home construction,” said Carol Frketich, regional economist for Canada Mortgage and Housing.

“In British Columbia, we have had the same low mortgage rates, [as the rest of the country] and a lot of employment growth.”

Peter Simpson, CEO of the Greater Vancouver Home Builder’s Association, said Statistics Canada’s finding that investment in construction is up 25 per cent almost mirrors the picture of Lower Mainland housing starts.

“For the year to date, we’re up 22 per cent,” Simpson said.

“That puts us at 16,350 starts for the first 10 months [of 2004].”

He added interest rates have a lot of room to rise before they dampen demand for housing. Prices, however, are a more immediate concern to home builders.

Simpson noted that the prices for land, building materials and municipal development charges have all increased, which have all helped to push the average price of a Lower Mainland house to $300,000.

“That’s nothing to celebrate in my view,” Simpson said. “That’s just another impact on affordability thresholds.”

However, Simpson noted that consumer confidence is high and builders continue to find innovative ways to produce lower-cost options to meet demand.

Frketich said her outlook for 2005 is that B.C. will see housing starts increase over the 2004 figures due to continued employment gains and rising migration. But she doesn’t expect the same rate of growth.

Nationally, Statistics Canada said residential construction investment was up 14.5 per cent in the third quarter to $20.2 billion, bringing the total for January to September to $52.2 billion.

While British Columbia, at $600 million, showed the second-biggest dollar gain to Ontario‘s $800 million, its rate of growth was third compared with Prince Edward Island, which saw 25.7 per cent growth, and Northwest Territories, which saw 30 per cent growth.

© The Vancouver Sun 2004

Digital text messages new service from Rogers

Wednesday, December 1st, 2004

Peter Wilson
Sun

The next voice you hear on your office or home phone could be digital, delivering a text message from your children at a party or your boss stuck in a meeting across town.

Called Txt 2 Landline, the new service, announced Monday by Rogers Wireless, will allow cell- phone users to send text messages to people with landlines.

And it will let you respond to them with a voice-only message in return.

The service will be free until April 2005 and then will add 25 cents to Rogers text messaging charges.

“The ability to send a text message to a landline device is non-existent today,” Rogers product and hardware management vice-president Raj Doshi said in an interview. “Now Mom and Dad will be able to get a message from their children saying, ‘I’m at this party, I’ll be late.’

“Or I might be sitting in a meeting and I have my cellphone but I can’t exactly leave to make a call, but I can send a quick text message saying ‘Honey, I’ll be home late for dinner.’ “

Doshi said that such a text message would be sent with the landline phone number on it and the system would recognize immediately that it’s not going to another cellular phone.

The technology will then translate the message from text to voice and deliver it, either to the recipient, or leave it as voicemail. The sender gets a message back saying the text has been delivered.

A live recipient can also reply, although that response would have to be sent via voice, said Doshi.

“Ideally it will evolve to the point where a text message is sent back but today that’s not a possibility,” said Doshi.

Telus Mobility representative Jennifer MacNeil said the company has no concrete plans for a Txt 2 Landline service yet, but is considering it.

Doshi said he believes Rogers’ competitors will eventually get into the service.

© The Vancouver Sun 2004