Archive for March, 2006

Sad farewell to Camp Howdy

Sunday, March 19th, 2006

The YMCA has operated the legendary camp for 60 years. But business is business, and the Y is willing to give up Howdy

Peter Clough
Province

Kaity MacDonald, with her dad Murray, plans to return to Camp Howdy this summer — and hopes that the camp will be around for years to come. Photograph by : Jason Payne, The Province

Concert Properties’ proposed 42-storey apartment tower would soar above a dramatically renovated YMCA on Burrard Street. Photograph by : Les Bazso, The Province

At Camp Howdy kids learn all the outdoor skills they’ll need. Photograph by : Les Bazso, The Province

Rustic yet cozy — that’s the experience you get at Camp Howdy which heads into its last summer as a Greater Vancouver tradition for kids. Photograph by : Arlen Redekop, The Province

Map of area Photograph by : Arlen Redekop, The Province

Do a Google Earth zoom down to Farrer Cove on the eastern shores of Indian Arm and you’ll almost hear the sound of campfire songs.

Over the past six decades, hundreds of thousands of kids from across the Lower Mainland have bounced along the logging road that leads to Camp Howdy — lugging along guitars, sleeping bags and hiking boots.

The camp, owned and operated by the YMCA, has given many of those kids their first taste of the B.C. wilderness.

It’s where they’ve learned to water ski, chop wood, climb rocks and make friends out of strangers — miles away from the comforting arms of moms and dads.

This summer, however, the air at Camp Howdy will be tinged with sadness. Late-night talks around the campfire will no doubt turn to the obvious topic:

Why does this have to be the final year for Greater Vancouver’s only overnight wilderness experience for kids?

This may well be the summer that the camp’s young guests learn more about the ways of the city and big business than about surviving in the great outdoors.

They’ll learn all about capital development funds, sustainable growth, zoning bylaws and how B.C.’s real estate boom has made the 74-acre piece of West Coast paradise irresistible to developers.

And some of them may well go home wondering whether Camp Howdy is being traded away as part of a complex deal to put up a 42-storey apartment building in downtown Vancouver.

For five years, the YMCA has been involved in negotiations to sell at least part of the Camp Howdy site north of Belcarra for condo development. Their aim has been to raise about $10 million from the sale, funds they claim are needed for other camps and community projects.

Under the plan, the Y would keep the camp running as a day centre — but even that is now in jeopardy.

So gather ’round, kids. This is a story that takes more twists and turns than the trail to Sasamat Lake — a trail that, according to some, leads to the 2010 Winter Olympics.

n n n

Belcarra resident Murray MacDonald, whose 11-year-old daughter Kaity is looking forward to staying at Camp Howdy again this summer, has been one of the most vocal opponents of the Y’s handling of the issue.

MacDonald has accused Y officials of behaving like bottom-line businessmen in their effort to raise money from their Howdy property. He says the Y’s claim that they need the money to improve Camp Elphinstone on the Sunshine Coast and support numerous community programs is little more than a smokescreen.

“They want as much money as they can possibly extract from Camp Howdy in order to finance the new building downtown,” says MacDonald, referring to the YMCA’s plan to modernize their facility on Burrard Street and add a private 42-storey residential tower in partnership with developers Concert Properties. “The story they’ve given us, of course, is slightly more skewed toward how this money will improve things for other camps.”

Under the Y’s plan, endorsed by Belcarra Mayor Ralph Drew and village council, 27 acres of the site was to be sold to a private developer for the building of between 80 and 100 homes. Another 47 acres was to be handed over to the GVRD as parkland.

Belcarra changed its official community plan, opening the door for future residential development on the site. But before any zoning change could be made, they needed approval from neighbouring Port Moody to allow direct and paved road access through that municipality’s portion of Belcarra Regional Park.

The plan to put up condos in such an isolated area caught the attention of GVRD policy and planning manager Hugh Kellas, who opposed the plan, citing transportation and environmental concerns.

Then last month Port Moody councillors rejected Belcarra’s road request, effectively killing the Y’s proposal. After all, who wants to live in a condo at the end of a long dirt road?

Port Moody’s refusal did not, however, mean that Camp Howdy was saved.

Saying the status quo was simply not an option, the Y’s president and CEO Bill Stewart announced that his organization would put the entire property on the market. Some Belcarra residents scoffed at what they saw as a bargaining ploy — saying that without a road and a zoning change the land is worth no more than $3 million and of little interest to developers.

But in an interview with The Province, Stewart says the Y has already received two unsolicited offers to buy the land outright, along with a third expression of interest.

He refuses to divulge details of the offers but says he estimates the Camp Howdy property to be worth between $8 million and $12 million regardless of road and zoning issues.

“There are people in our community and around the world who buy pieces of property for the future and not for the present,” says Stewart. He says the Y will not seek a commitment from prospective buyers to keep Camp Howdy running.

Stewart insists that the sale of Camp Howdy is not directly linked to the Y’s ambitious project, in partnership with Concert Properties, to modernize the Burrard Street YMCA and add a 42-storey private residential tower.

The tower?

Five years ago, Y officials approached leaders of the First Baptist Church, their next-door neighbour on Burrard Street, with a view to seeking zoning changes from the City of Vancouver.

First Baptist agreed to waive any concerns about the building of the tower in exchange for expanding its property through the acquisition of a parking lot the Y owned right behind the church.

The city gave its blessing to the project last fall, and the Y went ahead and sold the airspace above its building to Concert Properties for an undisclosed sum.

Concert is an award-winning B.C. development company wholly owned by unions and pension plans. It specializes in building luxury condos and upscale apartments — such as Tapestry, at the former Vancouver General Hospital nurses’ residence.

In its deal with the Y, Concert gets a new apartment building and a contract to complete the Y’s $35-million transformation of its aging facility at the tower’s base — right down to a state-of-the-art swimming pool.

Stewart says he’s counting on the project being completed by the fall of 2009 in time to showcase it during the 2010 Olympics.

In 2003, when the Y presented an online overview of its plan to sell Camp Howdy, “replace the Downtown YMCA” was listed as one of the major benefits. Stewart now says it’s “erroneous” to link the Howdy sale with the Y’s development deal. He says the non-profit organization needs between $6 million and $9 million to fulfill its obligations on the project, money that will be raised through a capital funds campaign.

“That’s going out and asking people to give us money,” he says. “We’re doing that now.”

Stewart says the YMCA has been in the process of building a $50-million capital development fund aimed at expanding its services. The money raised from the sale of Camp Howdy is part of that overall plan but he says the proceeds will be directed specifically to community projects such as a new child-care centre in Mount Pleasant as well as to much-needed improvements at Camp Elphinstone.

“We’re going to build some special lodges out there so we can handle kids and families with challenges and also fix up our general camp,” says Stewart. He promises: “We’re going to be bigger in camping than we are today.”

But Pat Godwin, whose now-grown sons both attended Camp Howdy, is not convinced.

“What Bill Stewart really wants the money for is this highrise downtown,” she says.

The Coquitlam mom has started a group called Save Camp Howdy and is hoping that the thousands of British Columbians who learned so much during their stay at the facility will join her campaign to keep the camp running as an overnight wilderness experience.

She says this is the last chance to save one of the Lower Mainland’s irreplaceable treasures.

“You drive there and you feel like you’re in the middle of nowhere, even though you’re 20 minutes from civilization,” she says. “To me, the whole thing about camp is that you’re away from home. You don’t go back home every day. You don’t have mommy and daddy backing you up. You’re learning to co-operate and make friends.”

Her son Jesse, a UBC student, has fond memories of his summers at Camp Howdy. “Every night you’d go down to the campfire and we’d have singing,” he says. “Every group had to produce a skit or do a song or whatever. It was just a fun communal thing.”

As a young adult, Jesse worked at the camp as a counsellor. He’s a firm supporter of the Y’s programs and says he understands the organization’s need to keep pace with modern realities.

“They’re strapped for money and they need facilities to service other communities that need it,” he says. “They’re not doing it for the wrong reasons, but it’s sad what’s happening. It would be best if there was a solution where the Y could get the money to do what they need to do with their downtown building — as well as maintain the camp.”

Vancouver lawyer Roy Millen, also a Camp Howdy counsellor in his youth, says it will be a tragedy to lose the facility or see it turned into a day centre. “There were a lot of kids who’d never been out in the forest before,” he recalls. “Lots of kids had never been in a canoe before. They’d never done any hiking.”

He says day camp simply cannot offer the same kind of experience.

Mayor Drew of Belcarra, meanwhile, says it’s too bad the original deal was killed — just one step from being completed in a way that would have left the camp running as a day centre.

Now, he says, the best hope is that the GVRD will ride to the rescue by buying the land outright and finding someone — possibly the Y — to operate the camp.

While the Y is considering offers from private developers, it is also negotiating with the GVRD, which has expressed an interest in acquiring the property. But will the GVRD be able to match the offers the Y says it has already received from private developers?

Drew says he’s hoping to hear an answer from the GVRD by the end of March. “At this point, my speculation is even odds,” he says. “We’ve got our fingers crossed.”

So, too, does Kaity MacDonald. Her Camp Howdy hat is hanging by the front door and she’s hoping to wear it this summer — and next summer, too.

Kaity talks of the friends she met there and of the memories she’ll treasure all her life.

“Camp Howdy should be standing for my children as well as my grandchildren so they can have the same great experiences as me,” she says.

© The Vancouver Province 2006

Concert Properties’ proposed 42-storey apartment tower would soar above a dramatically renovated YMCA on Burrard Street

Sunday, March 19th, 2006

The YMCA has operated the legendary camp for 60 years. But business is business, and the Y is willing to give up Howdy

Peter Clough
Province

Kaity MacDonald, with her dad Murray, plans to return to Camp Howdy this summer — and hopes that the camp will be around for years to come. Photograph by : Jason Payne, The Province

Concert Properties’ proposed 42-storey apartment tower would soar above a dramatically renovated YMCA on Burrard Street. Photograph by : Les Bazso, The Province

At Camp Howdy kids learn all the outdoor skills they’ll need. Photograph by : Les Bazso, The Province

Rustic yet cozy — that’s the experience you get at Camp Howdy which heads into its last summer as a Greater Vancouver tradition for kids. Photograph by : Arlen Redekop, The Province

Map of area Photograph by : Arlen Redekop, The Province

Do a Google Earth zoom down to Farrer Cove on the eastern shores of Indian Arm and you’ll almost hear the sound of campfire songs.

Over the past six decades, hundreds of thousands of kids from across the Lower Mainland have bounced along the logging road that leads to Camp Howdy — lugging along guitars, sleeping bags and hiking boots.

The camp, owned and operated by the YMCA, has given many of those kids their first taste of the B.C. wilderness.

It’s where they’ve learned to water ski, chop wood, climb rocks and make friends out of strangers — miles away from the comforting arms of moms and dads.

This summer, however, the air at Camp Howdy will be tinged with sadness. Late-night talks around the campfire will no doubt turn to the obvious topic:

Why does this have to be the final year for Greater Vancouver’s only overnight wilderness experience for kids?

This may well be the summer that the camp’s young guests learn more about the ways of the city and big business than about surviving in the great outdoors.

They’ll learn all about capital development funds, sustainable growth, zoning bylaws and how B.C.’s real estate boom has made the 74-acre piece of West Coast paradise irresistible to developers.

And some of them may well go home wondering whether Camp Howdy is being traded away as part of a complex deal to put up a 42-storey apartment building in downtown Vancouver.

For five years, the YMCA has been involved in negotiations to sell at least part of the Camp Howdy site north of Belcarra for condo development. Their aim has been to raise about $10 million from the sale, funds they claim are needed for other camps and community projects.

Under the plan, the Y would keep the camp running as a day centre — but even that is now in jeopardy.

So gather ’round, kids. This is a story that takes more twists and turns than the trail to Sasamat Lake — a trail that, according to some, leads to the 2010 Winter Olympics.

n n n

Belcarra resident Murray MacDonald, whose 11-year-old daughter Kaity is looking forward to staying at Camp Howdy again this summer, has been one of the most vocal opponents of the Y’s handling of the issue.

MacDonald has accused Y officials of behaving like bottom-line businessmen in their effort to raise money from their Howdy property. He says the Y’s claim that they need the money to improve Camp Elphinstone on the Sunshine Coast and support numerous community programs is little more than a smokescreen.

“They want as much money as they can possibly extract from Camp Howdy in order to finance the new building downtown,” says MacDonald, referring to the YMCA’s plan to modernize their facility on Burrard Street and add a private 42-storey residential tower in partnership with developers Concert Properties. “The story they’ve given us, of course, is slightly more skewed toward how this money will improve things for other camps.”

Under the Y’s plan, endorsed by Belcarra Mayor Ralph Drew and village council, 27 acres of the site was to be sold to a private developer for the building of between 80 and 100 homes. Another 47 acres was to be handed over to the GVRD as parkland.

Belcarra changed its official community plan, opening the door for future residential development on the site. But before any zoning change could be made, they needed approval from neighbouring Port Moody to allow direct and paved road access through that municipality’s portion of Belcarra Regional Park.

The plan to put up condos in such an isolated area caught the attention of GVRD policy and planning manager Hugh Kellas, who opposed the plan, citing transportation and environmental concerns.

Then last month Port Moody councillors rejected Belcarra’s road request, effectively killing the Y’s proposal. After all, who wants to live in a condo at the end of a long dirt road?

Port Moody’s refusal did not, however, mean that Camp Howdy was saved.

Saying the status quo was simply not an option, the Y’s president and CEO Bill Stewart announced that his organization would put the entire property on the market. Some Belcarra residents scoffed at what they saw as a bargaining ploy — saying that without a road and a zoning change the land is worth no more than $3 million and of little interest to developers.

But in an interview with The Province, Stewart says the Y has already received two unsolicited offers to buy the land outright, along with a third expression of interest.

He refuses to divulge details of the offers but says he estimates the Camp Howdy property to be worth between $8 million and $12 million regardless of road and zoning issues.

“There are people in our community and around the world who buy pieces of property for the future and not for the present,” says Stewart. He says the Y will not seek a commitment from prospective buyers to keep Camp Howdy running.

Stewart insists that the sale of Camp Howdy is not directly linked to the Y’s ambitious project, in partnership with Concert Properties, to modernize the Burrard Street YMCA and add a 42-storey private residential tower.

The tower?

Five years ago, Y officials approached leaders of the First Baptist Church, their next-door neighbour on Burrard Street, with a view to seeking zoning changes from the City of Vancouver.

First Baptist agreed to waive any concerns about the building of the tower in exchange for expanding its property through the acquisition of a parking lot the Y owned right behind the church.

The city gave its blessing to the project last fall, and the Y went ahead and sold the airspace above its building to Concert Properties for an undisclosed sum.

Concert is an award-winning B.C. development company wholly owned by unions and pension plans. It specializes in building luxury condos and upscale apartments — such as Tapestry, at the former Vancouver General Hospital nurses’ residence.

In its deal with the Y, Concert gets a new apartment building and a contract to complete the Y’s $35-million transformation of its aging facility at the tower’s base — right down to a state-of-the-art swimming pool.

Stewart says he’s counting on the project being completed by the fall of 2009 in time to showcase it during the 2010 Olympics.

In 2003, when the Y presented an online overview of its plan to sell Camp Howdy, “replace the Downtown YMCA” was listed as one of the major benefits. Stewart now says it’s “erroneous” to link the Howdy sale with the Y’s development deal. He says the non-profit organization needs between $6 million and $9 million to fulfill its obligations on the project, money that will be raised through a capital funds campaign.

“That’s going out and asking people to give us money,” he says. “We’re doing that now.”

Stewart says the YMCA has been in the process of building a $50-million capital development fund aimed at expanding its services. The money raised from the sale of Camp Howdy is part of that overall plan but he says the proceeds will be directed specifically to community projects such as a new child-care centre in Mount Pleasant as well as to much-needed improvements at Camp Elphinstone.

“We’re going to build some special lodges out there so we can handle kids and families with challenges and also fix up our general camp,” says Stewart. He promises: “We’re going to be bigger in camping than we are today.”

But Pat Godwin, whose now-grown sons both attended Camp Howdy, is not convinced.

“What Bill Stewart really wants the money for is this highrise downtown,” she says.

The Coquitlam mom has started a group called Save Camp Howdy and is hoping that the thousands of British Columbians who learned so much during their stay at the facility will join her campaign to keep the camp running as an overnight wilderness experience.

She says this is the last chance to save one of the Lower Mainland’s irreplaceable treasures.

“You drive there and you feel like you’re in the middle of nowhere, even though you’re 20 minutes from civilization,” she says. “To me, the whole thing about camp is that you’re away from home. You don’t go back home every day. You don’t have mommy and daddy backing you up. You’re learning to co-operate and make friends.”

Her son Jesse, a UBC student, has fond memories of his summers at Camp Howdy. “Every night you’d go down to the campfire and we’d have singing,” he says. “Every group had to produce a skit or do a song or whatever. It was just a fun communal thing.”

As a young adult, Jesse worked at the camp as a counsellor. He’s a firm supporter of the Y’s programs and says he understands the organization’s need to keep pace with modern realities.

“They’re strapped for money and they need facilities to service other communities that need it,” he says. “They’re not doing it for the wrong reasons, but it’s sad what’s happening. It would be best if there was a solution where the Y could get the money to do what they need to do with their downtown building — as well as maintain the camp.”

Vancouver lawyer Roy Millen, also a Camp Howdy counsellor in his youth, says it will be a tragedy to lose the facility or see it turned into a day centre. “There were a lot of kids who’d never been out in the forest before,” he recalls. “Lots of kids had never been in a canoe before. They’d never done any hiking.”

He says day camp simply cannot offer the same kind of experience.

Mayor Drew of Belcarra, meanwhile, says it’s too bad the original deal was killed — just one step from being completed in a way that would have left the camp running as a day centre.

Now, he says, the best hope is that the GVRD will ride to the rescue by buying the land outright and finding someone — possibly the Y — to operate the camp.

While the Y is considering offers from private developers, it is also negotiating with the GVRD, which has expressed an interest in acquiring the property. But will the GVRD be able to match the offers the Y says it has already received from private developers?

Drew says he’s hoping to hear an answer from the GVRD by the end of March. “At this point, my speculation is even odds,” he says. “We’ve got our fingers crossed.”

So, too, does Kaity MacDonald. Her Camp Howdy hat is hanging by the front door and she’s hoping to wear it this summer — and next summer, too.

Kaity talks of the friends she met there and of the memories she’ll treasure all her life.

“Camp Howdy should be standing for my children as well as my grandchildren so they can have the same great experiences as me,” she says.

© The Vancouver Province 2006

Staging helps sell houses

Sunday, March 19th, 2006

Province

Staging a house to sell is becoming all the rage. And more and more people appear to be turning to a real-estate stager or home showcaser for help.

It’s all about showcasing a home so it will sell fast and for top dollar.

“Basically, in home staging what you want to do is highlight the architectural selling features of the home,” Val Sharp, president of the Canadian Redesigners Association, said in a telephone interview from her Victoria home.

“So you place the furniture, hang the art and use accessories to do that,” she said.

When successfully staged, a home becomes more appealing to a wider range of potential buyers.

The difference between a redesigner and a home stager, Sharp explains, is that redesigners create a home that the people who live there will love, while the focus of a home stager is to create a home to sell.

Most makeovers — whether they’re a redesign or a home staging — are done quickly, usually in only a day or two.

Nancy Poulin of Regina offers the following tips to help homeowners make the most of their home’s appearance:

– Hang artwork properly, or the room will look off balance. Most people hang things too high.

“Artwork in a room should be hung closest to eye level for the activity that’s being done in that room,” Poulin says.

– Use mirrors to help open up a space and make it look larger.

– To make a hallway seem wider, paint one wall a shade darker than the other.

– Spray lemon or orange-scented furniture polish on a surface close to the entrance so potential buyers are greeted with a pleasant, fresh, clean smell when they enter the home.

“Don’t spray anything too perfumy, or they will be wondering what you’re trying to hide,” she cautioned.

– It’s never good to show a vacant house. Rent furniture and accessories, if necessary.

Staging a home can get better results, faster, Poulin says. But the house has to be priced reasonably, as well.

“No matter how much staging you do, if you are asking way over the market price, it’s going to take longer to sell,” she says.

— CanWest News Service

© The Vancouver Province 2006

Why does downtown look so tired and scruffy?

Saturday, March 18th, 2006

People aren’t taking care of the public realm, a friend says

Bob Ransford
Sun

We may have created in Vancouver the most livable downtown in North America in the last 15 years, if measured in simple numbers alone. The downtown peninsula population has increased by 40,000 to 80,000 and will probably reach at least 110,000 by the end of the decade, double the population before Expo 86.

But what is life really like for downtown dwellers in the new Vancouver?

Recently I received an e-mail from a friend who is a keen observer of just about everything that goes on around her. She and her husband have lived in the West End in a beautiful apartment in a heritage building for as long as I have known them. They are true urbanites, appreciating everything about downtown living.

She was lamenting what she sees as the deterioration of Vancouver’s downtown, especially the West End.

You should know that she is someone who cares deeply about something most people don’t really understand — community. She understands much better than most the interrelationships between the physical environment, the built environment and the way people interact and the way our institutions that represent “community” evolve.

Vancouver‘s new look is “tired and scruffy”, according to my friend. She attributes this appearance and new feeling to the fact that people are simply not paying attention to what’s going on around them on the street. People aren’t taking care of the “public realm”.

This is a term planners use to refer to those public spaces and the bits in between buildings — the places that are special places in highly dense mixed-use neighbourhoods.

“What about stores [especially major chains] that do not bother to sweep the street, pickup garbage or wash down the street in front of their stores – ever? One cannot help thinking that the managers do not live in the neighbourhood or do not care what happens outside the walls of their stores” my friend states, pointing to the lack of concern shown for those areas downtown dwellers should cherish.

The street and sidewalk is the family room or den for many apartment dwellers that lack this kind of informal space in their small apartments.

She also wonders why police aren’t dealing with the “the drunk or drugged panhandlers who hassle the public as they shop at their neighbourhood stores.”

“How can we get people to look around them and pay attention to there surroundings?” she asks with some desperation.

It is interesting that my friend also commented on the “tacky apartment buildings – glass towers, where the backs of computers, cords, backs of desks and other ‘stuff’ are located in front of the window.”

And, “What about people who use their balconies as an additional room to their apartment? The storage of bicycles, kids’ toys, the untended plantings/planters? Everything looking sloppy and untidy and thereby eliminating them for their intended use — outdoor living?”

Her observations about the architectural style of downtown residential towers and the way people live in the space that architects and planners designed might just be a telling commentary on how downtown life is evolving in Vancouver.

There is undoubtedly a connection between the way people value their private living environments and the way they value the public realm.

Is there also a connection between how people perceive the architecture of the built form they are living in and the way they value the place in which they live?

Does Vancouver’s brand of the modern architectural style as embodied in the downtown high-rise residential buildings speak to a lesser sense of value that people attach to their individual living environments — an attitude reflected in a public realm people don’t really cherish?

Bob Ransford is a public affairs consultant with COUNTERPOINT Communications Inc. He is a former real estate developer who specializes in urban land use issues. Email:

© The Vancouver Sun 2006

H-H in Yaletown

Saturday, March 18th, 2006

Bringing up baby in ‘hip’ location the H+H offer

Michael Sasges
Sun

Glowing panels of floorplans flanking Andrea Trethaway of the Homer+Helmcken presentation centre declares its open-for-business status. Photograph by : Mark van Manen, Vancouver Sun

‘Not your standard vertical tower’ H+H will consist of eight high-rise floors above eight low-rise floors. Photograph by : Mark van Manen, Vancouver Sun

(Kitchen) Photograph by : Mark van Manen, Vancouver Sun

(Bathroom) Photograph by : Mark van Manen, Vancouver Sun

(Faucet) Photograph by : Mark van Manen, Vancouver Sun

The architectural drawings that Tracie McTavish holds (above) are available in the H+H presentation centre for leisurely review latest testament to the changing quality of the conversation between new-home shoppers and developers locally. Photograph by : Mark van Manen, Vancouver Sun

At 16 floors, the high-rise component of the Homer+Helmcken building is not particularly tall. At eight floors consisting of six floors of apartments above two-floor townhouses, the low-rise, or base, component, is tall, however.

The “Robinson Tower” at Richards and Helmcken, just across the lane from H+H, climbs 17 floors, but only from a short base or “townhouse podium,” in the words of a city hall document the compares developments around the H+H project.

The office building at the northwest corner of Homer and Helmcken, across the street from H+H rises six floors.

The “City Crest Tower” at Homer and Davie, H+H’s next-door neighbour, rises 29 floors, but again only from a short base. (City hall asked the Chandler development company to improve that part of the H+H wall that rises two floors above the “City Crest” base.)

“Relative to the developments you’re seeing in today’s downtown marketplace, this is not a typical development,” comments Tracie McTavish of Rennie Marketing Systems, which is selling the H+H project on behalf of the Chandler development company.

“It is not your standard vertical tower with a typical floorplate that repeats from, say, the second or third floors up to the 30th floor.”

By forgoing all those floorplate repetitions, the development company surrenders construction economies. But it also gains market reach.

“It does offer the consumer far more opportunities and variety in floorplans,” McTavish observes. “And that’s a big plus.”

About 2,000 people, as of last week, had registered their interest in a new-home project of fewer than 200 homes, The “grand opening” today of the sales centre on Richards Street could find the Rennie sales people doing less selling and more taking orders.

The variety of homes available – the number of floorplans approaches 20 – is certainly one reason for the strong interest in the project.

The size of some of the homes is probably another. There are 85 two-bedroom or two-bedroom plus homes. The apartments range from about 800 square feet to about 900 square feet. The townhouses average around 1,200 square feet.

The building’s location is probably another. Residents of the homes above Homer and Helmcken streets will enjoy protected views to the east, across the “heritage” warehouses of Yaletown whose heights can be increased, but not by much.

“It puts you on a kind of a perch,” McTavish says of the building’s location, across Homer Street from the “western” boundary of the official Yaletown heritage neighbourhood.

So, who will be enjoying those views from the H+H building?

Families, moms ‘n’ dads and their modern-Canada equivalents and their children, are the expectation at city hall and at the Chandler development company.

“The building is located near local parks and . . . Elsie Roy elementary school . . ., making it an attractive address for families with children,” the social planning department comments.

One of the amenities Chandler will include in the building is a children’s playground in one of the two rooftop gardens. City hall, while applauding, also asked Chandler to include a washroom near the playground.

“You’re allowed to be hip when you’re 35 years old with a three year old. That’s a good thing, a very, very good thing,” McTavish says.

Rare will be the H+H family that has to walk the downtown streets between motor vehicle and apartment. Secure parking will be available underground, in 223 stalls.

Can Chandler do H+H on time and on budget, the question every new-home shopper should be asking these days of multiple-residential sales staff. There are no guarantees in life, of course. Here’s Tracie McTavish’s answer:

“The common thread in the majority of our meetings, with all of our developers, are constructions costs, where are they, where are they going, . . . ?

“The developers are recognizing the challenges ahead, be it cost increases, a lack of trades, and are factoring a stumble into their equations.

“I would argue that two or three years ago it wasn’t expected, it wasn’t planned for. And I think some developers probably got caught . The standard was you break ground and 22, 24 months later the buyers walk in and put their clothes in their closets. It isn’t that way always any more.”

Feeling lookie lou-ish this weekend? Visit the H+H presentation centre to see the latest “big” family home locally from a developer who’s going to market in interesting times. If there’s a line-up to get in, however, remember, mothers and children first!

 

HOMER+HELMCKEN

Project location: 1100-block Homer, Vancouver

Presentation centre: 1066 Richards

Hours: Noon – 6 p.m., Sat – Thu

Telephone: 604-692-0021

Web: hhyaletown.com

Project size: 192 apartments

and townhouses, 16-storey high-rise, eight-storey low-rise

Residence size: 1bedroom, from 557 sq. ft.; 2 bedrooms, from 910 sq. ft.; townhouses, from 1,180 sq. ft.

Prices: 2 bedroom, from

$460,000

Developer: Chandler Development Group Inc.

Architect: IBI/HB

Interior Design: BYU Interiors

Tentative occupancy: Fall, 2008

UNIQUE PRESENTATION CENTRE TELLS CONSUMERS WHAT IS AVAILABLE

New-home-project novelty

The Homer+Helmcken presentation centre on Richards Street is a new-home-project novelty (until someone says otherwise).

Two completed homes

It’s designed around two kitchens and their matching bathrooms, a presentation that has not been done before, in Tracie McTavish’s memory.

Two completed homes in a presentation centre have been not before, of course. Grace Kwok, the pioneer of the new-home pre-sell, and the Pinnacle development company installed two homes in the Esplanade presentation centre in North Vancouver, for example. One of the younger development companies locally, Mosaic, is selling its Shoreline townhouses in Pitt Meadows from three show homes.

kitchens that are very different

The two-kitchen, two-bath presentation in the H+H sales centre is to demonstrate an unusual component of the H+H product: The kitchens are very different in all their parts, not just in their dark and light colour schemes.

Their cabinetry is different; their counter tops are different; the appliance packages are different. For example, the “cool Manhattan” comes with “Shaker-style” cabinetry, meaning the doors consist of a panel framed by stiles and rails. The “warm Santa Monica” scheme (this page) comes with doors that consist of an unframed panel.

buyers can ‘make some decisions’

“It’s a different way to describe to consumers what’s available to them in the purchasing process,” McTavish comments.

” . . . they are interchangeable to a certain extent. It is an upgrade in other projects. We didn’t want to do upgrades; we just felt buyers deserve an opportunity to make some decisions.”

ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR WELL-EDUCATED CONSUMERS

Available for leisurely review

The architectural drawings that Tracie McTavish holds (above) are available in the H+H presentation centre for leisurely review, latest testament to the changing quality of the conversation between new-home shoppers and developers locally.

Valuable selling tool

“The consumer is pretty educated,” the president of Rennie Marketing Systems says. “You give him or her a floorplan, they’re not going, ‘what’s this box?’ They can read plans.

That’s why we have the plans table. It’s for the buyer to read the plans. It’s probably one of the most valuable selling tools in this display centre. People love to read plans.”

Plan enthusiasts tend to be younger

Not all people, of course. Younger shoppers are more likely to be plan enthusiasts than older shoppers.

“I would argue that the 20 year old, the 30 year old are probably further along the [learning] curve in general. It’s the world they live in” McTavish says.

“For people in their 40s and 50s and 60s, it is a little different. But we’re not necessarily marketing to 60 year olds in this building. We may be, with the penthouses.”

© The Vancouver Sun 2006

Woodward’s project attracts 3,000 prospective buyers

Saturday, March 18th, 2006

City planners, developers look to the east for space to build

Bruce Constantineau
Sun

Bob Rennie will be marketing the Woodward’s building in the near future. Photograph by : Ward Perrin, Vancouver Sun

If you don’t believe residential development in downtown Vancouver has taken a sharp turn to the east, consider this — more than 3,000 people have already signed up to preview 536 condo units that go on sale next month at the $300-million Woodward’s project near Hastings and Abbott.

Add the surging residential development activity taking place in nearby Gastown and Chinatown, and the trend is obvious.

“I said two years ago that the city was going to move to the east, but it didn’t take a genius to figure that out,” said Vancouver realtor Bob Rennie. “It had nowhere else to go.”

Rennie, who is marketing the Woodward’s condo units for developers Westbank Projects and Peterson Investment Group, said development sites in the western half of the downtown core are scarce now so city planners and developers are eagerly looking eastward.

“If you’ve lived in Vancouver all your life, you might look at [the Woodward’s project] as a questionable part of town,” he said in an interview. “But if you’ve lived in any other big city, you recognize these as emerging areas.”

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. senior market analyst Cameron Muir said increased demand for housing sites in that part of town will likely drive land prices higher and he expects the Woodward’s project — due for completion by the spring of 2009 — to be the “anchor tenant” that attracts other developments to the area.

“Once you see a critical mass [of new housing projects] achieved, then you see prices going up,” he said.

Muir said developers and buyers who invest in new housing in non-traditional areas might be taking a bit of a gamble, but the risks can be reduced with proper research.

“Any new development that opens up first has a certain amount of risk,” he said. “Values may not climb or may not be as firm as areas that are more established. But the first ones into a new area obviously pay less than those that come later, so that’s a mitigating factor.”

The Woodward’s condominiums will sell for prices ranging from about $250,000 to $600,000 for 600-square-foot to 1,100-square-foot units. Rennie has run full-page and two-page newspaper ads promoting the development since November and feels he probably doesn’t need to advertise any more, as 3,000-plus potential buyers have already signed up.

“I don’t need this many people on a database,” he said.

The Woodward’s development will contain a total of 536 market condominiums in two towers, of 41 storeys and 32 storeys. The larger tower features a 4,600-square-foot lounge and fitness centre on the top floor and the project will also be home to the new Simon Fraser University School for the Performing Arts.

It will also contain 200 units of social housing and retail amenities, such as an 18,000-square-foot drug store and a 25,000-square-foot grocery store.

“You need anchors like that to make it livable,” Rennie said. “In my view, Concord Pacific [on the north shore of False Creek] really didn’t work until they put in Urban Fare. You need a place to buy milk and bread when you get home from work.”

Rennie himself plans to follow the eastward trek in about a year when he moves his offices from Hornby Street to a renovated 117-year-old Wing Sang building on East Pender. He said it’s a multi-million-dollar investment he’s making to be closer to the residential action downtown.

He noted other new developments in the area include a 500-unit condo project near Tinseltown, a renovation taking place at Five West Pender, another redevelopment of 75 East Pender and several Gastown projects being developed by Vancouver entrepreneur Robert Fung, including the Terminus project at 36 Water Street.

Muir said developers will be challenged to match the numbers of new downtown condos built in previous developments because new popular areas like Gastown and Chinatown have height restrictions and heritage aspects that will restrict the scope and speed of future projects. The city will also require social housing in may developments, which will reduce the number of new market housing units.

“The goal is to have people from all socio-economic backgrounds living in reasonable proximity to each other, so they don’t have to commute long distances to work every day,” Muir said. “So people who work at Starbucks should be able to live in Vancouver, just like the people who own Starbucks.”

While real estate sales on the Greater Vancouver Multiple Listing Service dipped slightly last month, Rennie noted the downtown condo market remains strong because there’s not an oversupply of units and buyers and investors remain confident.

“They may get a low rate of return on their rental income but they’re looking for capital appreciation down the road,” he said.

Rennie expects about 10 per cent of Woodward’s condo buyers to be international investors from Europe, Asia or the U.S.

© The Vancouver Sun 2006

Housing costs increasing faster than inflation

Saturday, March 18th, 2006

Cost of ownership is outpacing the cost of renting, central credit union says

Derrick Penner
Sun

Housing costs in B.C. rose faster than the rate of inflation during the past 12 months, driven largely by increasing costs of home ownership, the Credit Union Central B.C. reported Friday.

In its Weekly Economic Briefing released Friday, Credit Union Central noted that housing costs, as recorded in Statistics Canada’s consumer price index calculations, were up 2.5 per cent over the past 12 months, compared with an overall inflation rate of 1.5 per cent.

The cost of owning a home was up three per cent during that period, compared with rental cost, which was up only 0.3 per cent from a year ago.

But does that mean a consumer is better off renting than owning? Not necessarily, according to Helmut Pastrick, Credit Union Central’s chief economist.

“It depends on individual circumstances,” Pastrick said. “When you look at the general performance of the price of ownership for housing, the potential for future capital appreciation [and] still low mortgage rates, I would suggest a person continue to look at ownership rather than renting.”

However, Pastrick added that by some measures, such as the price-to-rent ratio, which is used heavily by investors, Vancouver’s real estate prices look overvalued.

Credit Union Central reported that Vancouver’s price-to-rent ratio hit 40 in 2005, which means the average home price was 40-times greater than the rental income that an owner could expect to earn from the unit.

The report compared that with 2001, when the ratio was 26.

However, Pastrick said that when mortgage carrying costs — which are currently low — are factored in, much of the disparity apparent in the price-to-income ratio disappears, “and housing is generally still affordable.”

Pastrick added that while a very high price-to-rent ratio is sometimes considered a sign that a bubble is forming in the market, other factors need to be present, such as a high level of market speculation.

He said there does not appear to be much speculation in Vancouver’s market, and he doesn’t believe there is a bubble.

“I’m not discounting that a bubble could develop, I’m not discounting that the market could soften or turn down,” Pastrick said. “I just don’t know when it’s going to happen.

“Certainly one should expect some price correction at some point. It’s just the nature of the market.”

© The Vancouver Sun 2006

Olympic Games lust grows into ‘megaprojectitis’

Saturday, March 18th, 2006

Daphne Bramham
Sun

Richmond‘s leaders have megaprojectitis that has infected B.C. politicians forever.

The current economic boom (which everybody agrees is completely unsustainable) seems to have brought out the inner Wacky Bennett in all of them.

They are forging ahead with a $178-million Olympic oval on a site so soggy and unstable that its probable lifespan as an international venue is little more than a decade.

“In some places it takes a mob in the streets to stop government in its tracks. Elsewhere, the army does the honours. B.C. must be the only jurisdiction where administrations are periodically shaken up by accountants.”

That’s what my perceptive colleague Vaughn Palmer wrote back in 1998, which ironically was about the time that the first twinges of Olympic lust were awakening in the province.

The point he was making is that too often governments — especially in B.C. — plunge in with little concern for the consequences.

Politicians sweep the public along with them and their dreams. But when the bills come in, forensic accountants are called in to sort out the mess and taxpayers end up a little poorer.

The list is long. Suffice it to mention only fast ferries, the Expo land sale and the Coquihalla Highway.

Richmond‘s road to the Olympics is paved with the familiar hyperbolic flourish and few details.

City manager George Duncan has called the oval project “Times Square on the Fraser”. Communications manager Ted Townsend described it as a signature building more grandiose than B.C. Place and on par with Sydney, Australia’s opera house.

What they avoid saying is that the oval was the single most expensive Olympic venue even before Richmond decided to double the size and triple the cost.

The oval is also the only project that if it goes over budget, the provincial government will not pay for the overruns.

At this point, Richmond taxpayers are on the hook for $118 million for a facility that appears to have more risks associated with it than many, if not all, of the others.

Geotechnical engineers told the city in September that there is “considerable risk” that the 400-metre track could have enough wobble in it by 2018 that it won’t meet the International Skating Union’s rigid standard.

That standard is that the track cannot vary by more than 20 millimetres over its length or by three millimetres in a distance of three metres.

Those geotechnical challenges help explain why the Richmond oval is estimated at $178 million, while Turin built its oval for $100 million.

But what’s hard to understand is why Richmond council — knowing the extent of those challenges — agreed to go ahead with such an expensive facility that might quickly be obsolete.

Of course, nobody bothered to tell taxpayers the risks. Nobody bothered to tell them that council, the city manager, the project manager or whoever had accepted those risks and forged on anyway.

Just last week Coun. Bill McNulty, all flushed with enthusiasm after his trip to the Turin Olympics, wrote in the Richmond News that “post-2010 [it] will be a world-class venue available for use for elite-level sports competition and training.”

The only reason people know is because the geotechnical report was given to me in response to a request under B.C.’s Freedom of Information Act.

Maybe residents are happy spending $3,000 per household on a big, barn-like structure that won’t be up to its principal use in a decade.

But maybe had they known the cost and the risks in September when council did, they might have demanded that since its use as an international venue may be limited, the venue should be scaled back to the size required by the Olympics rather than being twice what’s needed.

They might even have voted differently in the November civic election.

But keeping the geotechnical details quiet is just part of the pattern.

Richmond devised its gold-plated offer behind closed doors. It didn’t even mention it to citizens until the deal was signed, sealed and delivered.

It was an offer Vanoc couldn’t refuse since it allowed Vanoc to cap its cost at $60 million (in 2002 dollars).

The city worked it out so that taxpayers would never get a chance to vote on the oval. With no plan to borrow money, no plebiscite was required.

The money was initially to come from casino revenue, sale of adjacent land, the development fund and sponsorship revenue.

However, it was just a few months ago that the city admitted that because of the rigid International Olympic Committee rules on sponsorships, no sponsorship or naming rights can be sold until after 2010.

When the $23-million underground parkade was added to help stabilize the oval and bumped the oval’s cost to $178 million, taxpayers were told it wasn’t an additional cost. They were told it was a cost-saving because more of the adjacent land would be freed up for sale to the private sector.

Ask city officials anything about the oval and what they’ll tell you is that it is on-time and on-budget.

They’re, of course, not counting the two recent decisions made in camera to spend $14.2 million to buy the Canadian Pacific Railway spur line for road construction around the oval and $2 million to hire several employees to work on projects including the oval.

It’s also hard to not be on-budget when construction hasn’t started and major contracts haven’t yet to be tendered.

As for being on-time, Richmond signed a contract guaranteeing completion in time for the Olympics regardless of what it costs.

Maybe we’re damned for all time to repeat our history of megaprojects.

But the whole point of knowing history is to not repeat the mistakes.

© The Vancouver Sun 2006

Construction is on schedule as concrete is ready to pour and tunnel boring will begin soon

Friday, March 17th, 2006

Other

Download Document

Grocers jockey for position in organic food fight

Friday, March 17th, 2006

Other

Download Document