Archive for June, 2007

Micro-notebook is a great idea

Sunday, June 3rd, 2007

You can use it to view and edit documents on your smartphone

Jim Jamieson
Province

What is it? Palm Foleo Mobile Companion

Price: $600-$700

Why you need it: You love the idea of a micro-notebook that will bond with your smartphone.

Why you don’t: You already have a laptop and this doesn’t have enough bells and whistles for you.

Our rating: 4 mice

Palm’s new teensy laptop is a great idea, but is it one whose time has come?

Palm founder Jeff Hawkins calls the device “the most exciting product I’ve ever worked on.”

The concept is that smartphones are becoming so prevalent and small that this laptop is really just a viewer — with a full-size keyboard and a 25-centimetre screen — to view and edit e-mail and office documents that reside on your phone. It’s forecast that by the end of 2007, an estimated 24.2 million wireless e-mail accounts will be in use worldwide.

There is a built-in Bluetooth wireless link that automatically updates edits made on Foleo or its paired smartphone. The Linux-based Foleo uses the smartphone or the Foleo’s built-in Wi-Fi for general Internet connectivity, and its applications include e-mail, a full-screen web browser, and editors or viewers for business documents such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint and PDF files.

Obviously aimed at mobile business types, this device will also get some traction with those who just want a cool, tiny laptop to take to the coffee shop.

Palm’s challenge is to get some momentum going on this new idea, and the company said it will work with third-party developers to support as many smartphones as possible, including its own Palm Treo, those using operating systems from Research in Motion, Apple and Symbian.

The 1.1-kg Foleo mobile companion turns on and off instantly and features a battery that lasts up to five hours. Available in Canada at retail stores this fall.

Rating 4 out 5

© The Vancouver Province 2007

 

Tourism target may be hard to hit

Sunday, June 3rd, 2007

Revenues from conventions and U.S. visitors need to jump

Ashley Ford
Province

Rick Antonson stands in front of Vancouver’s new waterfront convention centre, currently under construction. Photograph by : Gerry Kahrmann, The Province

Fears are growing deep within the heart of one of B.C.’s traditionally most optimistic industries.

Representatives of the tourism sector say they are in the fight of their lives to meet the challenge thrown at them earlier this year by Premier Gordon Campbell to double annual tourism revenues to $18 billion by 2015.

“It is going to be one hell of a stretch,” concedes Phil Barnes, regional vice-president of Fairmont Hotels & Resorts.

“You have to remember that rival destinations out there are trying to steal our business.”

Barnes says that while reaching Campbell’s goal isn’t impossible, it will take a monumental joint effort from everyone in the industry — and a whole lot more cash.

“We have to realize that we cannot be all things to all people and must concentrate on the regions that will bring us the highest yields, while not forgetting the rest of the world,” he says.

Tourism Vancouver boss Rick Antonson acknowledges the industry is tiptoeing along a tight line and anticipates there will be some post-2010 Winter Olympics fallout.

To this end, Tourism Vancouver has departed from past practice and produced a new strategic plan and direction from 2008 out to 2015.

The plan, released late last week, boldly states that “by 2015, Vancouver will surpass the previously forecasted $5.8 billion in incremental tourism revenue.” It is now worth about $4.4 billion annually.

Somewhat less boldly, the plan also acknowledges that between next year and 2015 Vancouver will need to attract a higher-yield customer base driven by convention and long-haul leisure business.

And this, Antonson readily acknowledges, is where it gets tricky.

To do this will require a 17-per-cent increase in total spending by Canadian tourists, 20-per-cent growth from the highly lucrative U.S. market and a 59-per-cent jump in the international market.

Breaking it down further, the numbers are equally challenging.

Hitting Campbell’s target will require 52-per-cent growth in convention business, 26 per cent in long-haul leisure revenue, 23-per-cent growth in corporate business, a 14-per-cent jump in independent revenue and seven-per-cent growth in short-haul leisure business.

The U.S. market is causing the most worries as it is already in a downward mode, primarily because of terrorism/border concerns and a fear by Americans of travelling outside their borders.

Throw in the unexpected stratospheric rise of the Canadian dollar and the problems multiply.

And then there is the newly expanding convention centre.

Putting aside the enormous cost overruns, now heading toward the $900-million mark from the original budgeted $495 million, there are real concerns about bookings post-2010.

The convention centre is a linchpin to Tourism Vancouver’s long-term strategy, and the current numbers are not exactly robust, although it is early days.

Former Tourism Vancouver chairman Jim Storie told the organization’s annual meeting last week that the centre has occupancy rates of 38 per cent for 2011, 28 per cent for 2012 and three per cent in 2013.

Just to get to a respectable level from 2010 to 2015 would take the booking of 70 to 80 new conventions by the end of 2009.

Conventions are a huge earner for the city and in 2006 contributed more than $1 billion to the Greater Vancouver economy.

A further critical need is for the sales and marketing structure of the convention centre to be made accountable to the industry for performance, says Antonson.

Currently, responsibility is shared between Tourism Vancouver and the Vancouver Convention & Exhibition Centre, but that must change, Antonson says.

While remaining confident “the centre will be worth every penny that is spent,” he acknowledges that competition from other cities will be tough, even though Vancouver has been named the top destination for international meetings by the International Congress and Convention Association.

Antonson and Vancouver International Airport officials are jetting off to Manchester, England, this week to pitch for an International Routes conference in 2010. This is the group that decides where airlines fly, so it is big, he says.

Even bigger prey is the Alcoholics Anonymous convention, held every five years. Antonson says they are pitching for the 2020 conference, which is the biggest in the world and attracts 65,000 delegates. The decision on a venue will be made next year.

Other critical factors include significant incremental revenues from provincial sources, more hotel rooms and full implementation of the long-promised “open skies” air policy.

The Conservative government continues to sit on its undercarriage despite extolling the virtues and promising “open skies” would be more than a mirage.

Antonson remains confident about the future, even predicting that tourism will ultimately rival forestry as B.C.’s largest industry. But he says his group’s current budget of $12 million is chump change when compared with Montreal’s, $28 million, and Toronto’s, $30 million.

It’s simply not enough to get the job done, he says. Ideally, he would love to put more salespeople into Chicago, Texas, Washington and Europe.

Barbara Maple, president of the Vancouver Convention & Exhibition Centre, says there is absolutely no reason for panic.

“We are exactly on track of where we should be in this booking cycle,” she says. “We have 54 events booked post-2009, and 29 of them would not have come here without the new convention centre because they need that space.”

© The Vancouver Province 2007

Vancouver city hall concerns shift dramatically

Saturday, June 2nd, 2007

Regulators will be asking developers what their proposals will contribute to helping save the planet

Bob Ransford
Sun

Brent Toderian, Vancouver’s new director of planning is spearheading Mayor Sam Sullivan’s EcoDensity initiatives. Jenelle Schneider, Special to the Sun

Vancouver may not be leading the way in sustainable urban development, but the city is poised to make up ground in the race to sustainability at a rapid pace.

There’s a new era in urban development rapidly dawning in Vancouver. It’s one where our individualistic and hedonistic obsession with the lifestyle pleasures of our special natural setting will be replaced with a collective serious concern for sustaining the ecosystems that are at the heart of our natural environment. The “eco” part of Mayor Sam Sullivan’s nifty brand name for new urban growth — EcoDensity — is taking on a real meaning under the leadership of Brent Toderian, Vancouver’s new director of planning.

Most suspected that Toderian had a serious green streak running through his planning ethos when he replaced his high-profile predecessor Larry Beasely, who developed an almost cultish following as a poster child for the new urbanism. But few knew how deep that streak runs in Toderian.

The new urbanism, a planning theory born more than two decades ago in the U.S., advocates the design of new “walkable” neighbourhoods that contain a diverse range of housing, jobs and high quality amenities.

Beasely guided the development of Vancouver’s own brand of the new urbanism with the rebirth of our downtown as a vibrant place for people to live and work. Some have argued, though, that the new urbanism has historically put too much emphasis on human livability and not enough on protecting the natural environment. In many ways, new urbanists focus on creating great places for people, embracing sustainable development by emphasizing principles like access to public transit, while focusing not so much on green building technology and the finer details of natural ecosystem preservation.

The focus of new urbanists is changing, just as concern for global warming and peak oil is suddenly engulfing public opinion in all circles.

New urbanist planners, like Toderian, are leading the way, reminding us that livability may be an important pursuit, but that livability means little if the planet no longer exists as a habitable environment for humans and all other creatures.

Toderian has already come out and told developers, politicians and citizen advisors — and anyone else who wants to listen to his message — that livability will no longer be the first indicator used to measure the quality of development in Vancouver. He is leading the way in replacing that benchmark with what he believes is a more urgent measure of our commitment to sustainability. Ecological sustainability will now be the measure of expected performance when judging new proposed developments in Vancouver.

Instead of asking how a development will improve quality of life in the city, Vancouver planners will be asking the question: how will that development contribute to helping save the planet?

This is a crucial difference. This shift in thinking at Vancouver City Hall is pretty dramatic.

What does it mean for the ordinary citizen in one of Vancouver’s typical single family neighbourhoods?

Well, when you combine this thinking with the policy direction that the mayor set a year ago in announcing his EcoDensity initiative, it means neighbourhoods are going to change and change will be measured not by how much or how little they disrupt current lifestyle in a neighbourhood. Instead, proposed change will be measured by how much it influences future lifestyle decisions that have the potential to impact positively or negatively our natural environment and its ecosystems.

Implementing this new planning ethos will take some crafty communicating. Stay tuned.

Bob Ransford is a public affairs consultant with CounterPoint Communications Inc. He is a former real estate developer who specializes in urban land use issues. E-mail: [email protected]

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

 

Homeowners now have quick access to advice

Saturday, June 2nd, 2007

Sun

PODCAST ADVICE

Homeowners now have quick access to advice and information from Scotiabank’s The Money Clip podcasts. The new Home Ownership Series features guest experts from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. and celebrity designer Margie Doyle White from the W Network’s Take This House and Sell It home decorating show.

The series will feature interviews with experts discussing such topics as mortgage options, home inspectors, household renovations and decorating trends.

Access to podcasts is available at themoneyclip.scotiabank.com for listening or downloading, or through a subscription from iTunes.

NEW ARCHITECTS

The Architectural Institute of British Columbia has recently admitted 79 new members.

To become a registered architect in B.C., an individual must possess a degree from a recognized school of architecture; complete 5,600 hours of work experience; write seven internationally administered exams; complete professional institute courses; and pass an interview with a panel of architects.

” . . . the need and demand for registered architects has never been so high,” institute president David Wilkinson says in a news release.

INCOMES DEPART

The differences in the incomes of owners and renters have expanded. Canada Mortgage and Housing reports that from 1990 to 2004, the median real after-tax income of owner-households rose 4.5 per cent, but that of renters fell 4.8 per cent.

CAPTAIN’S MAP

Sunshine Coast real estate agent Gary Little has created a map showing where Capt. George Vancouver and his crew camped during their 11-day survey of B.C. in 1792. Visit garylittle.ca/van250.html on the Internet.

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

 

Font choice in e-mails sends strong personality vibe: Study

Friday, June 1st, 2007

Misty Harris
Province

Rorschach tests are fine for those who think creepy inkblots are the window to the soul. But for Canadians who prefer a more contemporary shortcut to psychoanalysis, researchers say look no farther than your preferred typeface.

A study out of Wichita State University in Kansas has found the choice of font used in e-mails, web text, digital scrap-booking and other on-screen communication sends a strong message about the person behind the keystrokes.

For example, a mono-spaced typeface such as Courier New, in which every character — from the I to the W — has the same width, implies dullness and lack of imagination; a whimsical script, such as Gigi, points to a person who’s highly creative, feminine and unstable.

But unlike standard personality tests, which reveal who you are, the Wichita typeface analysis only indicates how others perceive you.

“I think it’s important for people to realize that typefaces do have inherent personalities, and those personalities do translate to the perception of the document,” says Dawn Shaikh, co-author of the study and a PhD graduate in human factors psychology. “It helps determine whether people trust you, see you as professional, see you as mature, honest, and all of these other things.”

The study involved 561 students who were asked to describe 20 popular typefaces using 15 adjective pairs.

Monospaced fonts were strongly linked with words like dull, plain, conforming and unimaginative. Modern display typefaces such as Impact and Rockwell Xbold were most associated with the adjectives masculine, assertive, rude, sad and coarse, while serif fonts such as Times New Roman and Georgia scored highest on words like stable, practical, mature and formal. Scripts and funny fonts such as Gigi, Comic Sans and Monotype Corsiva were connected to the adjectives youthful, happy, creative, rebellious, feminine, casual and cuddly, but simultaneously drew the highest scores for instability and impracticality.

“I have two daughters and all their letters from the school principal are written in Comic Sans,” says Shaikh, referring to a bubbly, childlike font introduced by Microsoft in 1995. “I know they’re trying to be cute, but it’s so unprofessional.”

© The Vancouver Province 2007

Salt Spring Island project “The Cottages” on Bullock Lake near Ganges by Developer Tuan Development leaves shareholders on a limb

Friday, June 1st, 2007

David Baines
Sun

In a two-part column in January 2006, I raised a red flag about a resort on Saltspring Island that is being developed by Vancouver businessman Brian Hauff.

The project, known as The Cottages, is located on Bullock Lake near Ganges. It consists of a lodge, a separate pool building, and 123 cottages in various stages of construction.

The project is being developed by Tuan Development Inc., a B.C.-registered company controlled by Hauff.

In my earlier columns, I noted that Hauff is a former bankrupt, a failed real estate developer, and president of a junior public company (Agronix Inc., quoted on the dreadful OTC Bulletin Board in the United States) that he conceded was “a piece of junk.”

In particular, I noted this was Hauff’s second attempt to develop this project. During the first go-around, the lender was Multimetro Mortgage Corp., a mortgage broking firm run by Vancouver businessman Ken Megale.

To fund the first stage, Multimetro raised $8 million from many small investors, but much of that money was used to pay hefty brokerage fees to Multimetro and extremely high rates of interest to investors.

There were also construction delays and problems with the Capital Regional District, which never really liked the project. Eventually, it went into foreclosure. Multimetro lenders, who by this time were owed $11 million including accrued interest, lost everything.

The property was put on the auction block and, lo and behold, Hauff’s company, Tuan Development, ended up buying it for $8.5 million, setting the stage for round two.

Hauff didn’t put any of his own money into the deal. It was financed entirely by Gibraltar Mortgage Ltd., a Calgary mortgage broking company which, like Multimetro, raised the money from numerous small investors in B.C. and Alberta by offering high rates of interest.

By the time I arrived on the scene in January 2006, Gibraltar had committed $25 million for the first phase. Hauff was running an expensive marketing campaign to pre-sell the units, including seductive newspaper ads urging investors to hurry, as demand would surely exceed supply.

But sales were not going well. The units were expensive, and zoning restrictions limited usage by prospective owners. The Capital Regional District had also imposed a stop-work order after discovering that Hauff was making changes that did not accord with the original building permit.

“Although this glitch will probably be worked out,” I noted at the time, “I am not at all sure that this project will be completed without somebody’s fingers being burned.”

Sadly, that prophecy is now coming true. In February, Gibraltar called its loans. On May 18, Tuan Development applied for temporary protection from its creditors under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. MacKay & Co. Ltd. has been appointed monitor.

According to an affidavit filed by Hauff, the project has amassed nearly $32 million in debts. Of this, Gibraltar provided about $31 million, including accrued interest.

Gibraltar investors are secured by first and second mortgages on the property, but it is not clear that the partly finished project has enough equity to repay them in the event of liquidation.

A $1-million third mortgage was granted to secure advances made by MMT Properties Ltd., which Hauff hired to market the project. MMT, interestingly enough, is run by Megale. Another $1.12 million is owed to trade creditors, who are unsecured.

In an affidavit, Hauff blamed construction delays caused by Gibraltar’s failure to raise funds in a timely manner, and scheduling difficulties due to the high demand for construction trades.

He said he believes creditors will recover more if the project is reorganized and development is allowed to continue, than if it is liquidated. He claims he has received expressions of interest from other financiers.

Hauff’s affidavit provides another potentially disturbing piece of information: He said Tuan Development is 75 per cent owned by himself and 25 per cent by Saltspring Island Investments Ltd., which is owned by Gibraltar — a potential conflict of interest.

It is not clear whether Gibraltar investors were advised of this potential conflict. Gibraltar’s president and CEO, Darrell Cook, did not return my calls. Gerry McCracken, the firm’s commercial mortgage underwriter, could have cleared up the matter, but he said he is “not at liberty” to discuss the matter, as it is before the courts.

Tuan Development’s application for long-term relief from creditors is tentatively set to be heard next Wednesday. Meanwhile, only three, one-quarter units have been pre-sold (a total of three-quarters of a unit) and interest on Gibraltar’s loans is accruing at the rate of $500,000 per month, money that Gibraltar investors are unlikely to ever see.

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

 

Riverbend developer put in receivership – deposits returned, lender puts complex in Foreclosure

Friday, June 1st, 2007

Lender for Coquitlam complex pulls plug after pre-sale contracts cancelled

Derrick Penner
Sun

The mortgage lender for the Riverbend condominium complex in Coquitlam is foreclosing on the project and putting its developer into receivership.

In a controversial move that made headlines in early May, CB Development 2000 Ltd., cancelled 32 pre-sale contracts that buyers had signed to purchase strata-titled detached homes in Riverbend. The company blamed rising construction costs and a lender that wouldn’t release its loan unless the units were resold at current market rates.

In the midst of a flurry of legal actions against CB Development, the construction lender, CareVest Capital Inc., has won a B.C. Supreme Court order putting the developer into receivership, and has begun foreclosure proceedings.

Alan Baumann, president of Calgary-based CareVest, said in an interview that his company stepped in because it had learned that the Riverbend project’s property insurance was about to be cancelled.

This week, CareVest sought and received a court order appointing David Bowra of the Bowra Group as receiver. Baumann said Bowra now has control of the Riverbend project and will determine “what’s the best course of action on a go-forward basis.”

Shane Coblin, a lawyer representing six of 17 Riverbend buyers who are suing CB Development to have their contracts honoured, said CareVest’s action gives them a glimmer of hope.

“The way they’ve chosen to do it was to at least try and see if there’s a way they can complete these contracts,” Coblin said.

Bowra, in an interview, said he is preparing a report for the court on the project’s viability and is meeting with pre-sale purchasers to discuss their options.

However, after meeting with the developer and contractors, Bowra said he has determined it will take an additional $2.6 million to finish building the 32 homes.

“It is not economic to complete the project at current costs based on the contract [prices],” Bowra said.

Baumann was also cautious not to raise hopes. He said that any future course would be up to the receiver.

“The project is a casualty of the hot B.C. economy,” Baumann said.

CB Development pre-sold the 32 units two years ago, which Baumann said “effectively capped their revenue,” then faced runaway cost increases and difficulty keeping trades workers.

Mortgage lenders typically allow for loan advances to a project “on a cost-to-complete” basis, as long as there is enough equity in the project to be completed. Riverbend, he added, no longer had enough equity to finish it.

“When lenders are being asked for $4 only to get $3 back, they usually say, ‘I think it’s time you look at it a different way.’ “

On May 14, the provincial superintendent of real estate issued a stop-marketing order on the Riverbend project barring resale of the units in part because the lawsuits against CB Development impaired the company’s ability to pass clear title on to new owners.

CB Development did not return Vancouver Sun phone calls Thursday. In previous interviews, the company has said the 128-unit Riverbend project was plagued by inflation of construction costs that outstripped sale prices.

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

New convention centre needs a quick rescue plan

Friday, June 1st, 2007

Over-budget and under-booked, the project could turn into the Liberals’ equivalent of the fast-ferry fiasco

Sun

Seen through the pilot house of the Zaandam cruise ship, the new Vancouver convention centre is taking shape on the waterfront. Photograph by : Ian Lindsay, Vancouver Sun

When the latest bad news about cost overruns on the Vancouver Convention Centre hit the streets in February, critics claimed it had become the Liberals’ fast-ferry project.

At the time, that claim was largely rhetorical excess, but disturbing news this week about lacklustre bookings for the convention centre after its scheduled completion may yet make it stick.

As we wrote in February when the latest estimate of more than $800 million was released, the $300-million increase over the original budget would likely be forgotten over the next two decades as long as the convention centre is a financial success once it opens its doors. Now that success appears to be in jeopardy.

Outgoing Tourism Vancouver chairman Jim Storie revealed this week that projected occupancy rates are currently just 38 per cent for 2011, 28 per cent in 2012 and an abysmal three per cent in 2013. Those numbers prompted one prominent hotelier to warn that unless more business can be found in a hurry, the new convention centre is going to be the “biggest empty ballroom in town.”

Those post-Olympic years seem a long way off, but major conventions of the type the new centre was built to attract are typically booked three to five years ahead.

Storie says another 80 to 90 conventions need to be booked over the next two years to ensure reasonable occupancy levels in the five years following the 2010 Olympics.

Tourism Vancouver president Rick Antonson said that won’t happen without putting more money into sales promotion. But Fairmont Hotels and Resorts regional vice-president Phil Barnes complains that the current division of responsibility between Tourism Vancouver and the Vancouver Convention and Exhibition Centre for booking conventions needs to be resolved so that one group or the other can be held accountable for the success or failure of the new facility. Antonson says there are still hundreds of prospects that could be sold on Vancouver if Tourism Vancouver had the resources to seek them out with a larger sales staff.

What’s clear in all of this is that, if the convention centre is a success, we all benefit from the increased business it will bring to Vancouver.

If not, it will be a financial drain for taxpayers and an embarrassment to the city and the province.

Given the stakes, the provincial government as chief underwriter of the project needs to quickly convene all the players and figure out what is needed to head off this impending financial disaster. If more seed money is needed from the province to drum up conventions, it must be attached to a business plan that will be carried out by a lead agency which can be held accountable for carrying it out.

Right now, it appears the convention centre expansion project is drifting towards the same rocks on which the fast ferries foundered.

© The Vancouver Sun 2007