Archive for November, 2007

Provincial government to fund plans for social housing

Thursday, November 8th, 2007

Christina Montgomery
Province

Under increasing fire for social-housing plans that are heavy on announcements and light on bricks and mortar, the City of Vancouver and the province agreed yesterday to fast-track action — on planning.

In what Housing Minister Rich Coleman described as “a bold move,” Vancouver has agreed to take the province up on an offer to pay to speed up approval of up to 1,200 new social- housing units on 12 sites owned by the city. The province agreed in October to pay all “pre-development” costs — architects, lawyers, surveyors, engineers and permit fees. Yesterday, the city agreed to accept the donation, which was not costed.

Coleman said the undetermined amount of money would come from the $41 million he announced in October as part of a plan to “break the cycle of homelessness.”

Last month’s announcement contained no funding set aside for actual construction of housing units. Building the 1,200 units planned for the city-owned sites could cost as much as $300 million, given present construction costs.

Yesterday, Coleman said he hoped the deal to expedite planning would result in a launch of construction on at least six of the city-owned sites within a year.

But the timeline could be tight. The proposal will be tabled at a Nov. 13 city council meeting for referral to a public meeting Dec. 12. Project-specific open houses are planned for early 2008 and will include proposed designs, building programs and management plans.

The first of the projects is likely to come before the Development Permit Board in June, where the public can again comment. If approved, provincial money will begin to flow for professional services.

NDP housing critic David Chudnovsky was shaking his head over the “announcement about planning, not housing. This is the second announcement of nothing,” he said. “[In October], they announced no new homes — in the middle of a homelessness crisis. There’s still no money for new homes. It’s a housing announcement without housing.”

Miloon Kothari, a United Nations housing official, visited the Downtown Eastside recently and said afterward that it was “glaringly apparent in Vancouver that for quite some time . . . successive governments have failed to create the housing that is necessary.”

© The Vancouver Province 2007

 

Metro real estate sales hit seldom-seen level

Wednesday, November 7th, 2007

Derrick Penner
Sun

For only the fourth time in the last 25 years, Greater Vancouver realtors made more than 3,000 multiple-listing-service sales.

The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver said 3,099 transactions were reported, an increase of 11.2 per cent compared with the same month a year ago.

New inventory, however, remained relatively unchanged with 4,819 in October compared with 4,862 in October a year ago.

The so-called benchmark price for a typical detached house was $730,022 in October, up 12.2 per cent year over year. The benchmark price for a Greater Vancouver townhouse was up 10.8 per cent to $454,645. The benchmark condominium apartment price was up 11.4 per cent year over year to $371,418.

“What we’re seeing is a buoyant market fueled by strong demand form both first-time and repeat buyers,” board president Brian Naphtali said in a news release.

Naphtali added that the region’s low unemployment and strong economy help support that demand.

Cameron Muir, chief economist for the B.C. Real Estate Association, added that the number of condominiums being built in Greater Vancouver helps the first-time buyers, but so do changes to mortgage terms that extend the amortization period.

Over the last year, Canada Mortgage and Housing has begun insuring mortgages with a 40-year amortization, which Muir said decreases the buyers’ monthly payment, giving them a chance at clearing the hurdle of qualification.

“A sizeable number of first-time buyers are choosing longer amortizations in order to get into a home now rather than wait,” Muir said.

Forecasts earlier this year predicted that Vancouver‘s high prices would have slowed sales by now, Muir said. He expects to see sales slow in 2008 as rising prices squeeze more buyers out of the market.

Patricia Croft, chief economist for Vancouver-based Phillips Hager & North Investment Management, said rapid price appreciation and relative unaffordability in Vancouver‘s market is its biggest concern.

“The laws of gravity haven’t entirely been repealed,” Croft added. “You never know exactly what the catalyst is for cooling in real estate.”

Croft said the factor that causes a market to cool could be mortgage rates, a weaker U.S. economy that lowers Canada‘s prospects or simply the sentiment of buyers in the market.

“At some point, you would expect to see things cool off [ in Vancouver],” she added. “But anybody who has waited for that has been disappointed so far.”

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

 

Vancouver Ritz Carlton Hotel at a $500 million value is the biggest project to start construction in 2007 third quarter

Wednesday, November 7th, 2007

B.C.’s large construction plans increase for the 17th straight quarter

Derrick Penner
Sun

Builders and developers piled another $3.3 billion worth of planned large construction projects onto British Columbia‘s Major Projects Inventory between June and the end of September ballooning the list to $135.1 billion, the province said Tuesday.

There are now 843 projects on the list, which is compiled quarterly by the Ministry of Economic Development. Some 417 projects valued at $53.4 billion are already under construction. It is the 17th straight quarter the inventory has increased.

The third-quarter list, for the three months ending Sept. 30, includes projects that have been announced but have since been put on hold, which stood at 33, the same number on hiatus at the end of the second quarter.

That compares with $40 billion worth of work underway from a list that totalled $109 billion at the same period a year ago.

Minister of Economic Development Colin Hansen said the inventory “is the best indicator of real, tangible [economic] activity for the years ahead.”

Hansen added that the size and time span of the inventory offers hope for the B.C. economy after the 2010 Olympics, although some economists predict a softening following the Games.

“Most of these projects take us well into the next decade,” Hansen said.

Vancouver‘s Ritz Carlton Hotel and residential development on Georgia Street, at a $500 million value, was the biggest new project to start construction in the third quarter.

Cloudworks Energy’s $263-million run-of-river hydroelectric development is the next biggest piece of work to get underway.

Manley McLachlan, president of the B.C. Construction Association said the breadth of work available on the project list is comforting. The inventory isn’t dominated by either residential building or industrial projects.

The fact it is growing, rather than shrinking “supports the observation that we’ve had for quite some time. To call this a boom now is almost a redundant comment.”

However, while the inventory is evidence that high levels of construction are likely to continue for some time, which helps the skills-starved construction industry recruit new workers, its ballooning size provides its own problems.

“The real challenge though, is are we going to continue to be able to manage that growth over the long term,” McLachlan said. “And I think the verdict is still out.”

Some of the rising dollar value in the inventory list reflects the inflation in construction costs, McLachlan added, as high demand for buildings — and not jus in B.C. — drives up the prices for materials such as steel and concrete as well as labour.

The fact that project developers continue to make plans for new buildings, McLachlan said, is hopeful evidence “that we haven’t perhaps reached the breaking point where owners are saying ‘this is way too much, we’re going to delay our project until something changes.’

“We haven’t reached that point, and I don’t know where that point is,” although McLachlan said shortages of skilled workers have extended the schedules of some projects.

Hansen said he believes the growth in construction in B.C. is manageable. While construction costs are increasing, that growth hasn’t had too deep an impact on B.C.’s overall inflation rate, which would be a bigger concern.

“Companies are reaching out and are finding workers,” Hansen said, “and I see very few projects cancelled or delayed because of skill shortages.”

The value of projects on hold dropped $1.9 billion in the third quarter to $9.6 billion.

The inventory compiles the list from public sources and tracks capital projects worth more than $20 million or more in the Lower Mainland south west region and $15 million or more elsewhere in the province.

 

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

 

Real estate industry bullish on Vancouver

Tuesday, November 6th, 2007

Derrick Penner
Sun

Vancouver scores strongly for its real-estate investment potential among industry experts who are generally bullish about prospects for Canadian markets compared with those in the United States, according to a recent report.

Vancouver does not rank as highly as Calgary, “North America‘s No. 1 boomtown,” or Edmonton, which is also caught in Alberta‘s energy glow, according to Emerging Trends in Real Estate, compiled by the Urban Land Institute and Pricewaterhouse-Coopers.

However, the city does have a diversified economy “that operates on all cylinders,” although it’s “outrageous real estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors.”

Demand for housing still outstrips supply in Vancouver, said Neil Atchison, director of real estate advisory and transaction services for Pricewaterhouse-Coopers in Vancouver.

Atchison added that indications are that housing construction in the city is easing toward “a more orderly market,” people are still moving to Vancouver, which is making developable land harder to find, and raises one of the region’s biggest concerns.

The lack of land pushes up industrial and office rents as well as housing prices.

Atchison said, affordability, particularly on the housing side, is the problem.

“Are we just about maxed out in terms of people’s incomes to afford more housing?” he asked. “That, if anything, is going to slow down the price increases.”

Atchison said the region’s economic fundamentals are strong enough to support the market, and he doesn’t believe real estate markets have peaked since prices continue to rise.

As long as Canada isn’t “caught up by events beyond our control,” such as a U.S. recession or the high Canadian dollar “pricing out some of our industries,” Atchison said Canadian markets shouldn’t see a downturn.

The report, compiled from interviews and surveys with 600 industry professionals ranging from investors to lenders, developers and brokers, found Canadian respondents to be “more positive” about 2008 than American participants in the survey.

The report measures corporate-level investment sentiment among big investors and big developers.

In the report, the authors said that Canadian economies, particularly in the West, are performing well and Canadian investors feel more insulated from the turmoil in U.S. markets by a more conservative investment environment.

Atchison said there have been some changes since the survey was conducted in the summer. Most notably, the American subprime mortgage situation has heated up. “Our lending practices [in Canada] have been more stable, so we don’t have the subprime issue,” Atchison added.

“The impact for us is more [among] the people investing in Canada who need to get mortgages. It is a little more difficult, a little more expensive to do.”

Overall, Atchison said Canada‘s real estate markets have a better balance of supply and demand.

The report found that while American real estate markets are plagued by tightening credit and fears of a recession, the report found Canadians more optimistic.

Canadian respondents believed that, with pension funds still flush and eager to increase the size of their real estate holdings, “[capital] flows can be sustained where in the United States they may decline.”

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

 

Pressure eases on Valley real estate

Tuesday, November 6th, 2007

Derrick Penner
Sun

The Fraser Valley‘s real estate market moved closer to balance in October with the number of houses for sale hitting a seven-year high.

Fraser Valley realtors recorded 1,464 Multiple-Listing-Service-registered sales during October, up 14 per cent from the same month a year ago, according to the Fraser Valley Real Estate Board.

The 3,124 new homes listed in October represented a 12-per-cent increase from new listings in October 2007. The total Fraser Valley inventory sat at 8,712 units at the end of October.

“It’s been seven years since Fraser Valley buyers had this much inventory to choose from,” Jim McCaughan, the Fraser Valley Real Estate Board president said in a news release.

In an interview, he added that realtors would like to see even more homes added to inventory to ease pressure on markets.

“We’ve almost got a very nice balance between people being able to sell in a short period of time and buyers being able to take their time to make a purchasing decision,” McCaughan said.

The average number of days that a detached house spent on the market increased to 52 days in October sales, the Fraser Valley board reported. That’s an increase of 10 days compared to October a year ago.

The average price on a Fraser Valley detached home reached $517,087 in October, up 6.1 per cent from October 2007.

Tsur Somerville, director of the centre for urban economics and real estate at the University of B.C.‘s Sauder School of Business, said the signals are consistent with the over-all market slowdown that has been expected. He added that the rising inventory “is not consistent with gross oversupply” that would trigger a correction in the market.

However, Somerville said a market slowdown is needed at this point, because too much real estate is becoming unaffordable for too many people.

He added that changes in mortgage terms that allow for 40-year amortization periods have helped reduce monthly mortgage payments for some buyers, which has helped the market.

“At some point even that plays itself out,” Somerville said. “There are price points that people just cannot enter at, so it isn’t a place to get a lot of growth.”

The average price of a Fraser Valley townhouse reached $329,991 in October, an increase of 9.5 per cent. The average apartment condominium price of $193,466 was a 17.5-per-cent increase from a year ago.

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

Housing starts slow to sustainable level

Monday, November 5th, 2007

New construction still strong but down from September’s ‘unbelievable’ gain

Eric Beauchesne
Sun

Wondering what the economy or government can do for an encore in the coming week, following the past week’s surprise announcement of $60 billion in tax relief, the news of a fall in the unemployment rate to a 33-year low, and the surge in the currency to a modern-day high?

How about a reality check, for a start.

“We’re expecting to see Canadian housing starts come back down to earth,” said TD Bank economist Jacqui Douglas, forecasting that the report from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. Thursday will show the annual pace of construction starts last month fell to a still-respectable 220,000 but well down from from the unsustainable 281,000 a month earlier.

“The gain in September was simply unsustainable, if not unbelievable,” Douglas said, echoing the skepticism with which a lot of analysts also greeted last week’s report of a 63,000 surge in employment and ensuing drop in the jobless rate to a modern-day low of just 5.8 per cent.

Nonetheless, BMO Capital Markets economist Douglas Porter noted that “against all expectations, it now looks possible” that housing starts this year will be higher than last year, which in turn were higher than the year before. It’s all in stark contrast to the expected 25-per-cent plunge in home-building in the U.S. this year, which follows a 13-per-cent drop the year before.

And other analysts, such as those at CIBC World Markets, also anticipate a further increase in building construction plans when Statistics Canada releases its building permits report Tuesday, suggesting that builders may need a reality check.

More in line with what one would expect in an economy with a currency now trading at $1.07 US level, exports and the merchandise trade surplus have been shrinking.

And analysts are expecting more of the same on Friday when Statistics Canada reports the latest trade figures for September.

What’s more surprising, again in light of the strong dollar which makes imports less costly and more competitive, is that some analysts, like Douglas, expect the report will show imports shrunk as well, albeit by less than exports.

“We expect to see the trade balance drop to $3.7 billion in September, from $4.1 billion in August,” Douglas said. “We expect to see declines in both exports and imports, largely due to the recent slowdown in manufacturing activity on both sides of the border.”

TD projects exports fell two per cent and imports by one per cent.

While BMO’s Porter also expects the trade surplus fell to just below $4 billion, he noted that’s “still a healthy sum” adding that’s in line with a $15-billion-a-year surplus in Canada’s overall dealings with the rest of the world, which includes goods and services trade and investment and currency flow.

And again, Canada’s trade performance, despite five years of a rising dollar against a depreciating greenback, remains healthy and in direct contrast to the U.S., where, as Johnny Cash might have lamented, they “ain’t seen” a surplus “since I don’t know when.”

Just how bad that trade deficit has become will be revealed Friday as well.

But Porter is putting the shortfall, which includes both goods and services, at $58 billion, up a notch from $57 billion in August which as staggering as it sounds was a seven-month low.

Greasing the projected slip back deeper into deficit was the sharp rise in oil prices during the month, which more than offset gains coming from the continuing increase in exports coming from the slide in the greenback against a number of currencies, he said.

CIBC World Markets is somewhat more pessimistic about the U.S. trade deficit projecting it will be nearly $60 billion, which it said could be a “slight negative” for the U.S. dollar .

So would be weaker-than-expected reports during the week on U.S. manufacturing activity or on consumer sentiment.

And that would translate into further upward pressure on the already stratospheric loonie.

Meanwhile, U.S. Federal Reserve Board chairman Ben Bernanke will give his take on the U.S. economy in a speech Tuesday and again during what might be more revealing testimony to Congress on Thursday.

Bank of Canada senior deputy governor Paul Jenkins will be in the U.S. this coming week giving a speech to Wall Street market players on Tuesday, at which he’s likely to suggest, as governor David Dodge already has, that the loonier is not worth as much as it’s trading for.

Back in Canada, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty will start the week by continuing to promote his mini-budget in a speech in Toronto, while at the same time continuing to warn taxpayers not to expect any more tax relief, suggesting that either he wants to surprise them again in a spring budget, or that he’s beginning to worry that he really has emptied the cupboard this time.

And on Bay Street, companies here will continue to roll out their third-quarter earnings, which will be scrutinized for evidence of dollar-damage.

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

 

City’s megaproject a triumph of engineering, not architecture

Monday, November 5th, 2007

Don’t expect to see the new convention centre on postcards any time soon

Miro Cernetig
Sun

An artist’s drawing depicts the Vancouver Convention & Exhibition Centre expansion with its rooftop garden.

The Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain, is drawing crowds to the city

It’s often said God was Vancouver‘s architect-in-chief, creating the sea, the snowcapped mountains and backdrop of deep, green rain forest that make this city stunning. But good gosh, isn’t it time the mere mortals on the ground started pulling their weight, too?

I raise this suggestion after spending the last few years watching, with great expectation, the rise of our latest addition to the waterfront: the expanded Vancouver Convention & Exhibition Centre.

There’s been a raging debate over the fact the near $1-billion price tag of this new edifice far exceeds planners’ — and taxpayers’ — expectations. But less talked about is that this “signature building” falls far short of another expectation: great architecture.

To be fair, it’s no outright disaster. It seems well-engineered, something you’d expect given the cost overrun. And as a building designed to attract conventions and offer visitors an impressive view of the water and mountains once they get here, this mostly glass structure, with its six-acre roof garden, will do the trick.

But don’t expect anyone to be sticking this building on postcards or Architectural Digest to be putting it on the cover.

From a design perspective, the convention centre is esthetically underwhelming, more a triumph of engineering than architecture. The word mediocre comes up repeatedly whenever I ask people who watch these sort of things in the city.

“It’s not a terrible building,” says Gordon Price, director of the City Program at Simon Fraser University. “But it’s not a great building, either. We could and should do better.”

Aside from its roof garden, expected to be covered in West Coast flora, and its promise to be the most environmentally sensitive convention centre yet, the structure cuts, well, a conventional profile on the skyline.

In fact, at this stage it seems to fall short of two of the key principles city planners set out in 2003 in a Vancouver Sun article: The building’s profile wasn’t supposed to compete with the sails of the Pan Pacific, one of the city’s true architectural icons, and it wasn’t supposed to look like a big box on the waterfront.

Well, walk around the site and see for yourself what’s going up on the shores of Coal Harbour.

The glass skin that is now being put over the skeleton of concrete and steel girders is clear, thankfully. But this is definitely a massive box we’re getting, albeit one with a few graceful curves engineered in.

It is also very high — in fact it seems monolithic in the context of the buildings around it — and it does detract from the majesty of the Pan Pacific’s white sails. As for that cool roof-top garden we hear so much about, it’s going to be inaccessible from the ground and most of it will be difficult to see unless you happen to be flying over in a float plane or are gazing down from your hotel room’s window.

There’s not much you can do to change a building that’s mostly up and is hopelessly overbudget, of course. But there’s a lesson to be learned here in the future development of the city: Put architects back in control of how our major buildings, both public and private, will look.

We need the engineers, planners and politicians to keep the costs in line and keep things real, but don’t let them water down the great designs, as so often happens behind the scenes.

The reason is that great architecture doesn’t just make a city a nice place to live — it can build your economy.

It can be risky, as Montrealers who spent a generation paying off Olympic Stadium found out, if you don’t do it right. But it can also put you on the map.

Consider Bilbao, Spain. Once a nondescript town that seemed to be sliding into oblivion, its city leaders decided to build a branch of the Guggenheim Museum and gave a cutting-edge architect the job: Canadian-born Frank Gehry.

He came up with the swirling titanium museum that cost about $120 million. It has transformed Bilbao into a world destination and revived the city’s economy. I wonder what he would have done with a billion dollars?

The point here isn’t for Vancouver to copy Bilbao. But it is an encouragement to start thinking their way when it comes to how this city’s skyline will look in the years to come.

In the run-up to the Olympics and beyond, Vancouver has some big development decisions to make that could put us on the cutting edge of architecture.

Large sections of the waterfront are up for development. The city seems to have opened the door for taller buildings, even skyscrapers. And the provincial and city governments are going to be grappling with the construction of a new stadium on the waterfront, the building of a new art gallery and perhaps even the creation of a concert hall, something all great cities need.

So, who do we want to do the dreaming up of how these buildings will look?

A committee or an architect? Let’s hope it’s the latter.

© The Vancouver Sun 2007

How to become a master of seduction with these 5 opening lines

Sunday, November 4th, 2007

Calling all shy, awkward guys: You can score by just being you — just drop the ‘hey baby’

Cheryl Chan
Province

It isn’t easy to be single in Vancouver.

Plenty of beautiful, smart, attractive women say Vancouver is a hard place to meet men: They’re cute, but sadly, mute.

Ronald Lee is determined to change all that — one guy at a time.

“Some of these guys don’t know how to communicate with women, how to approach them,” he says. “It’s a learned skill. No one is born knowing this automatically.”

With his stocky build, casually mussed hair, and a round, friendly face, Lee doesn’t look like a Casanova, Don Juan or even a George Clooney.

But clad in a navy blue hoodie at a Yaletown coffee shop on a Thursday afternoon, he exudes confidence.

Lee, 32, is head coach and founder of Man Meets Woman, a Vancouver company that teaches shy, socially awkward men the finer points of attraction and seduction.

To seduce means “to win over, attract, entice, and charm.” But in today’s hook-up dating society, seduction can be a dirty word.

“There’s a stereotype of a shady, manipulative type of guy,” says Lee.

And that’s clearly not his style.

Lee’s coaching philosophy is “about honesty and authenticity, just being yourself.”

He doesn’t teach a magic line or sure-fire trick. “It’s a lot of hard work,” he says. “It’s about improving yourself as a person.”

Lee’s background is in kinesiology and communications at SFU. He has no formal credentials in psychology and counselling but bases his lessons on popular psychology, scientific studies and first-hand experience.

“I’m very flirtatious and very social,” he says. “It’s easy for me to talk to people.” (He met his girlfriend of 14 months at a wedding, where he chatted her up in the hallway).

He got his start about a decade ago when he joined the online subculture of pick-up artists dedicated to unlocking the mysteries of the opposite sex — sometimes with dubious tactics.

It is a world with its own lingo, where an AFC (Average Frustrated Chump) learns how to become a PUA or Pick-Up Artist, as chronicled in Neil Strauss’ book, The Game: Penetrating the Secret Society of Pick-Up Artists.

It has spawned legendary lotharios, MPUAs or Master Pick-Up Artists, who go by pseudonyms like Juggler, Mystery or Twotimer, and tour the international circuit teaching men how to score and snag beautiful women.

Lee points out that he has distanced himself from that scene. “Some of the tactics are low-level and, frankly, just wrong.”

He’s ditching the canned pick-up lines, stock stories and choreographed come-ons in favour of a more natural, direct method.

“Be social, or learn how to be social,” he says. “You could say I’m teaching guys basic social skills.”

To train his students, he uses lectures, videos, role-playing and “in the field” experiences at the mall or during a night on the town to practise what they’ve learned in the classroom.

So far, about 250 men from the Lower Mainland, Seattle, Portland and cities across Canada have taken his courses. Costs range from $60 for a 90-minute How to Flirt course to $1,400 for a three-day “foundation” course.

Man Meets Woman will be holding a one-day workshop at the downtown YWCA today — billed as “An Audience with Zan! The World’s Greatest Seducer!”

Over the phone from Montreal airport, Zan Perrion points out that the nickname came from a reporter.

“I wouldn’t call myself that,” he says. “I’m just a guy interested in a dialogue.”

In seduction terminology, the 43-year old Vancouver-based coach is a “rake” — someone who loves and appreciates women.

He teaches men the secrets of attraction, but his real fans, he says, are the women themselves.

“Men talk about the notion that they’re not sure how to react in the dating world, and what their role is supposed to be,” he says.

“And women say to me everywhere, ‘Where are the real men who don’t apologize for being a real man?'”

Perrion says men should state their intentions clearly and approach women without what he calls “the beer shield.”

“Women are craving men who don’t dial themselves down and who are not afraid to be our true selves,” he says.

After travelling the world giving seminars in cities such as Cape Town, Panama City, Frankfurt and San Francisco, he agrees that his hometown is a big challenge for singles of both sexes.

“In other cities . . . people really mingle,” says Perrion. “Here, we go out in little groups, we sit in little groups, mingle in our group and then go home. There’s no spirit of celebration.”

Perhaps that’s why business is booming.

On Nov. 30, Perrion will hold a three-day intensive workshop on the Way of Attraction at the Sutton Place Hotel.

Lee has a whole slew of courses scheduled for the month, and will be launching a new coaching company for women next week called Happy Sexy You.

For women to meet guys, he says, they need to “let go of the fear of rejection, make it easier on the poor guy and give him some signals.”

But back to men. Here is what I learned from these two seduction masters on how best to approach potential girlfriends:

Say “Hello,” not “Hey, baby.” Be confident but respectful. Be direct but not presumptuous. Be sincere but not a wuss.

Be alpha-male masculine, but not caveman-like.

Be yourself, just with better communication skills.

RONALD LEE SUGGESTS THESE FIVE OPENING LINES

1. Ask for their opinion. “Can I ask you for a quick female perspective?”

2. If you find them attractive, say so. “You’re really cute/beautiful.”

3. “You have a very interesting energy. What”s your thing?”

4. “You have a beautiful smile.”

5. Say something spontaneous and relevant to the situation, such as “I love your top,” or “How’s your coffee?”

© The Vancouver Province 2007

 

energi to go: Portable cellphone charger packs several hours worth of batteries

Sunday, November 4th, 2007

You’ll never run out of juice again

Jim Jamieson
Province

What is it? Energizer Energi To Go mobile-phone charger Price: $27.99 Why you need it: You’re a high-use cellular phone yakker who’s always on the go.

Why you don’t: Your phone’s battery will last more than a week on standby, and that’s plenty long enough for you to remember to plug it in.

Our rating: Sometimes the lower-tech route is the best.

Energizer’s Energi To Go cellphone charger is nothing fancy, but it does the job for those who might run out of juice at a crucial time.

It’s also handy for those who want to pack a separate power source away for emergency kits or when off the beaten track.

This reusable cellphone power pack is simply that — a small, pod-shaped unit containing two AA batteries that is connected to your cellphone when its internal battery is taking a time out at an awkward time.

The beauty of this device is it doesn’t require much wait time after you plug it in to get your communications gadget back up and running.

A call can be placed within 30 seconds of activating the Energi To Go on some cellphones with a completely discharged battery.

However, some other, more powerful multimedia-type smart phones may take a few minutes to get booted up.

Compatibility includes most common models, such as Nokia, Palm Treo, Motorola, Sanyo, LG, Samsung cellular phones and mini USB devices, including Razr, Slvr and the BlackBerry.

Energizer says the battery pack will provide up to nine hours of usage with GSM phones and up to three hours with CDMA-type handsets.

Available at most electronics stores.

© The Vancouver Province 2007

Strata Property Act – Door, window rules tough

Sunday, November 4th, 2007

Who has to pay for those repairs?

Tony Gioventu
Province

Our strata corp reads your column every week. We live in a 15-unit patio home. We are a little confused by the Strata Property Act and our bylaws.

Two years ago, one unit had to replace a broken transom window — the opening part of the window is above the main window and opens outward. At the time, the units were about 14 or 15 years old. It needs replacing again. The strata says the owner must pay for the replacement part because it’s due to wear and tear. The owner interprets what she had read as “strata pays for repairs to the envelope of the unit, owner pays for anything on the inside.” Please advise us of the proper ruling on this issue. — Margo McEwan, Campbell River.

Dear Margo: Doors and windows have to be the most misunderstood item in the legislation.

There are two types of strata corporations: building designs where the air space is divided into strata lots and therefore building exteriors are almost always common property; and bare-land stratas where the strata lot is the measured property and the buildings not shown on the strata plan are not the strata responsibility for maintenance and repair.

With a building-type strata, the Strata Property Act, regulations and bylaws make the responsibility of the doors and windows that face on to common property or common hallways the responsibility of the strata corporation. The act and regulations do not permit the strata to create bylaws making owners responsible for common property. So as long as the area is defined as common property, it is the strata’s responsibility, as in your case. However, bylaws may designate items such as patio-door rollers, handles and cranks within the strata lot to be an owner’s responsibility.

Think of the logical side of this. How many owners would really take the necessary care and cost of properly repairing the windows if they could get away with it more cheaply? How many owners have enough experience to make the right decision? One of the greatest benefits of strata living is the economics of scale. The cost of 20 windows at a time will be cheaper than one, creating a much more cost-effective method of operating in a strata, and the strata can control the outcome. The Homeowner Protection Office has a helpful bulletin ( Maintenance Matters) on residential windows and doors at http://www.hpo.bc.ca/Consumer/index.htm

Tony Gioventu is the executive director of the Condominium Home Owners Association (CHOA). Contact CHOA at 604-584-2462 or toll-free at 1-877-353-2462 or fax 604-515-9643 or e-mail [email protected]

© The Vancouver Province 2007