Archive for March, 2008

Mortgage lenders see more borrowers give up

Monday, March 10th, 2008

Noelle Knox
USA Today

Lost Pond Construction’s Jeff Tortorea inspects a foreclosed home near Cleveland before putting it back on the market.

On the front lines in the mortgage foreclosure crisis, lender and loan servicer Dennis Lauria says his deepest losses are from borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth and simply mail in the keys, rather than try to work out a new payment plan.

“I can’t get you to pay if you’ve got no skin in the game,” says Lauria, senior vice president of Popular Mortgage Servicing in Cherry Hill, N.J., who says 14% of his customers with subprime loans — high-interest loans given to people with poor credit ratings — are in default.

Nearly 3 million homeowners were behind on their mortgages at the end of last year, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) said last week. An additional 1 million-plus borrowers were at risk of imminent foreclosure. The number of foreclosures is likely to set records throughout the year and poses an increasing risk to the housing market, the financial markets and the economy.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says the mortgage industry needs a “vigorous” response to help beleaguered homeowners. But what about the response — or lack of one — from borrowers?

In California, Florida and Nevada, particularly, where prices are falling the steepest, rising numbers of borrowers are giving up and abandoning their homes despite the significant damage a foreclosure can have on the credit ratings that determine their ability to get future loans.

Nationwide, more than half the borrowers who lose their homes through foreclosure never answered their lenders’ calls or letters, according to Freddie Mac. And an MBA analysis found that 23% of loans in foreclosure last fall were to homeowners who had no contact with their lenders, and that an additional 18% were to absentee owners.

The numbers help explain why it’s so difficult to reverse the trends of rising foreclosures and falling property values. Even some homeowners who can afford to pay their mortgages are defaulting, Lauria says, because their house might have lost 30% of its value, and they figure it will be a long time before it’s worth what they paid for it.

“They say, ‘If I play my cards right, I can live here free for 12 months, maybe longer’ ” before the lender can foreclose, Lauria says. “Our challenge isn’t contacting the borrower. I can talk to them, but they stick their tongue out at me.”

Hundreds of thousands of distressed homeowners are reaching out for help. The Homeownership Preservation Foundation, part of the Hope Now Alliance, fields more than 4,000 calls daily to its toll-free hotline (888-995-HOPE). But about 1 in 4 callers don’t want credit counseling, the foundation says. Many simply want financial relief.

Thary Yin, 26, who works at Wells Fargo’s call center in South Carolina, talks with 10 to 20 borrowers a day.

“A lot of the stories I hear from mortgagors are situations that are very, very extreme,” she says. “I talked to a cancer patient, and after Katrina hit New Orleans, the stories I hear. … Wells Fargo offers solutions on the mortgage side, but on the personal side, you can only cover so much on a phone call. Not being able to do more personally is the most difficult thing for me.”

Getting more aggressive

With home prices sliding and politicians calling for government and the mortgage industry to do more to help troubled homeowners, lenders and loan servicers such as Lauria are becoming more aggressive in contacting delinquent borrowers and modifying loans to make payments a bit easier.

Such tactics make sense for the loan industry: The last thing a lender wants is another vacant property to fix up and sell.

“We’re becoming more realistic about where the market’s going to go,” said David Sunlin, senior vice president for foreclosures and bankruptcy at Countrywide Financial, which is the nation’s largest mortgage lender and the focus of several government investigations into aggressive lending practices that made the company financially vulnerable.

With an inventory of nearly 40,000 foreclosed properties nationwide, Sunlin says, he will work with a borrower to try to sell a property, even with a sizable loss, up to the date it’s scheduled to be auctioned at a foreclosure sale.

At JPMorgan Chase, which has seen foreclosures jump 38% in the past two years, cases now go from collections to the “loss mitigation” department just five days after a borrower misses a payment, so the company can try to find a faster solution to keep the homeowner in the property. Not so long ago, the loss mitigation department didn’t get involved until 90 days after a missed payment.

As soon as a lender takes control of a property, the value begins to drop while the maintenance costs mount.

Safeguard Properties, a company many lenders use to change the locks, cut the grass and board up windows on foreclosed homes, has seen business rise more than 15% during the past year. A lender will pay $600 to $1,200, and more in some cases, for Safeguard to care for each property.

The largest surges in new foreclosures in the fourth quarter of 2007 were in California, Arizona, Nevada and Florida, where the frenzied real estate boom in the past several years attracted buyers who put little money down and got risky loans with virtually no proof of income.

Avoiding lenders

There are many reasons homeowners behind on their mortgages fail to contact their lenders, mortgage specialists say. Some don’t believe their lenders can help them. Others fear it will only speed the foreclosure process. And some don’t call because they simply don’t have money to give the lender, according to surveys by Wells Fargo and Freddie Mac.

“It’s (lenders’) own fault that borrowers won’t answer their calls,” says Todd Buckner, CEO of National Housing Solutions, a for-profit mediator between borrowers and lenders to stop foreclosures. “Their collections departments have beat (delinquent homeowners) over the head for months. It’s no wonder borrowers won’t answer the phone.”

To reverse public perception that they don’t want to work with troubled borrowers, lenders are hiring and training hundreds of employees to answer calls and help borrowers restructure their mortgages. They also are turning to more creative ways to try to reach at-risk homeowners.

The Hope Now Alliance, a coalition of 28 lenders and loan servicers supported by the Bush administration, has mailed more than 1 million letters since December to borrowers with subprime, adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs). In many cases, the lenders are offering to freeze the borrower’s interest rate for five years. In other cases, borrowers may qualify for a 30-year, fixed-rate loan. Even so, the response rate has been less than 20%, on average.

To find homeowners who have stopped paying their mortgages and moved out, lenders use companies known in the trade as “skip tracers.” One of them, Players National Locator, for example, is receiving 7,000 cases a month from lenders looking to track down delinquent homeowners, up 20% since September.

Martin Goodman, president of Residential Capital in San Diego, sends his delinquent borrowers a $5 Starbucks gift certificate, along with documents that explain how his company can help them restructure their loans and avoid foreclosure. His response rate is only 10%.

But Goodman says making contact is only one challenge. The other is persuading delinquent borrowers to tell the truth about their financial condition. He suspects at least 90% of borrowers don’t explain the real reason they are falling behind on their payments out of fear it might accelerate their foreclosure.

“Everybody’s grandmother is dying. Everybody’s kid is having surgery,” Goodman says. “I’d rather somebody say, ‘We mismanaged our debt. This is what we make, and this is what we can afford.’ “

A ‘sense of entitlement’

As home prices fall from coast to coast, 8.8 million homeowners will have mortgage balances equal to or greater than the value of their property by the end of the month, Moody’s Economy.com. predicts.

That could come as a shock to consumers who thought property values would always rise, and it helps explain the attitudes lenders are seeing among their troubled customers, Goodman says.

“If you buy a car and it depreciates,” Goodman says, “you don’t expect the automobile dealer to write off your loan. There’s a sense of entitlement (among homeowners) that is just unbelievable.”

Goodman, whose firm specializes in home equity credit lines, says the main reasons people took out the loans were for home improvement, debt consolidation and medical expenses. But he estimates that about 20% used the cash to go on vacation or buy a new car.

Stories like his are fuel for the opposition in Washington against a government bailout for homeowners facing foreclosure. On the other side, consumer advocates such as the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) can cite a litany of abusive lending practices that hurt homeowners.

“The government ought to get involved because there’s been a market failure,” said John Taylor, CEO of NCRC. “Our proposal is for the government to act as a cash-flow agent, to temporarily acquire the mortgages creating these problems long enough to refinance them into sensible terms and conditions. There would be no bailout because the government gets paid back.”

So far, the Bush administration has backed two initiatives from the Hope Now Alliance to help some homeowners avoid foreclosure. But their restrictions severely limit their effectiveness.

In December, for example, the alliance said it would freeze interest rates or refinance an estimated 1.2 million homeowners with subprime ARMs. To qualify for the interest-rate freeze, borrowers would have to be facing a 10% increase in their mortgage payment once their interest rate reset. But many subprime ARMs are tied to an international index that has fallen 2 percentage points since Christmas.

“In our portfolio, 60% of the borrowers who would have gotten fast-tracked (under the Hope Now plan) would not get that now that the rates have changed so much,” said Melissa Lucas, director of loss mitigation for Home Loan Services.

Instead of a payment increase of $450 a month, on average, her customers will see their payments rise by only $135. They may still qualify for other loan modification programs, she said, but not for the Hope Now plan.

FHA can help, sometimes

In a separate push, the administration backed this year’s temporary increase in the maximum loan limits of the Federal Housing Administration, which caters to first-time and low-income borrowers.

The FHA also has created a new loan program, called FHASecure, to help subprime borrowers refinance out of risky ARMs. Since it was announced in fall, the FHA has received about 277,000 applications and approved fewer than half of them.

In New Jersey, Lauria said he sent the FHA about 3,000 of his company’s delinquent loans to see how many could be refinanced under the FHASecure program. The answer: 61.

Even for the borrowers who contact their loan servicers, the options the companies can offer are tightly constrained by their contracts with investors who buy and sell pools of loans that are packaged as bonds.

But Lauria doesn’t believe every homeowner who can’t pay their mortgage can or should be saved.

“One-third of people who are delinquent should be in foreclosure. It’s the best alternative,” he says. “They don’t have the money. They shouldn’t have (gotten the loan) to begin with.”

And that’s why, he says, he doesn’t blame some of them for walking away from their homes.

 

Let your lawyer vet that presale deal

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

Tony Gioventu
Province

Dear Condo Smarts: With all the media coverage recently about presales going badly, we were wondering if you could answer a question for us. We took possession of our presales home in the fall, and everything with the sale went very well. The price was the same, the product was delivered on time and our unit was what we had anticipated.

Our strata does have a very real problem, however, with the parking. The developer intended on most of the presales to provide each person with two parking spaces, but now we discover there is barely enough for one parking space per unit.

Most owners we’ve spoken to are furious. Many have two cars and are having to either sell one or rent parking in a neighbouring parkade. Do we have any recourse ? Our real estate agent has told us a parking spot in downtown Vancouver downtown can be worth $25,000 or more.

— JG, Vancouver

Dear JG: Presales have a significant inventory of limitations and exemptions. When anyone buys a presale, they are not buying real estate. They are entering into an agreement with the developer for the right to purchase that real estate when the property is finally complete and the titles are created for conveyance.

The price, what you are buying and any terms or conditions in that contract are all part of the negotiations. Take great care in purchasing a presale agreement, though. As the first purchaser/party to the contract, you have seven days to reconsider your decision and have your deposit returned.

If you want to ensure you have a decent deal and reasonable security in the agreement, you must take your agreement to your lawyer for legal review before the seven days is up. Everything on a presale is negotiated and most, if not all, conditions may be subject to change, alteration, price increases, exemptions, exclusion or outright cancellation of the contract.

So, in many ways, a presale is a speculative investment and, along with that, come all of the risks of speculation.

Subsequent assignments (buyers) should also understand that only the original deposit by the first purchaser is secured, either in trust or by way of deposit insurance.

In simple terms, the first presales buyer can sell their presales agreement to another person. If their original deposit was $50,000 and they sell the agreement to a second person for $100,000 and make $50,000 profit, the only protection for the second purchaser is for the original $50,000. Any increase above the original deposit is not protected and at risk if the project is cancelled.

I did manage to obtain a copy of the presales agreement for JG’s building, and there is a limitation for parking. “Subject to availability and cost of construction, up to two parking spaces may be negotiated for a strata lot. Parking may be limited by zoning and construction limitations and will not be confirmed until final sale.”

The final sales agreements only included one parking space. It’s more than “buyer beware.”

Presales buyers must review every document, amendment and the final sales agreement before they proceed. Seek professional guidance and be prepared for the risks.

Tony Gioventu is executive director of the Condominium Home Owners Association. Contact CHOA at 604-584-2462 or toll-free at 1-877-353-2462, or e-mail [email protected]

© The Vancouver Province 2008

Preparing your home when you head on vacation

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

Shell Busey
Province

Q Should we turn off the main water valve when we go away? Are there any other things should be done?

— Graham, Surrey

A The following is a list of things to do when leaving your home to avoid any unwanted surprises while you’re away.

1. Shut off automatic ice maker in the refrigerator.

2. Shut the water supply off under each toilet tank.

3. Unplug instant hot water heaters, e.g. countertop units.

4. Turn the setting on the hot water tank to vacation.

5. Shut off supply hoses to automatic washing machines.

6. Winterize outside faucets by shutting off the individual water supplies and draining the faucets by turning to the on position.

7. Leave thermostats at 19 degrees Celsius.

The rule of thumb is to shut off anything that might freeze and/or fracture a pipe. I don’t recommend shutting off main water valve since you may have items such as automatic humidifiers that require water. Consider installing a device called The FloodStopper? that detects water appliance and plumbing failure or accidental floods and immediately turns off the water supply. For more information, go to their website: thefloodstopper.com.

© The Vancouver Province 2008

 

Preparing your home when you head on vacation

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

Shell Busey
Province

Q Should we turn off the main water valve when we go away? Are there any other things should be done?

— Graham, Surrey

A The following is a list of things to do when leaving your home to avoid any unwanted surprises while you’re away.

1. Shut off automatic ice maker in the refrigerator.

2. Shut the water supply off under each toilet tank.

3. Unplug instant hot water heaters, e.g. countertop units.

4. Turn the setting on the hot water tank to vacation.

5. Shut off supply hoses to automatic washing machines.

6. Winterize outside faucets by shutting off the individual water supplies and draining the faucets by turning to the on position.

7. Leave thermostats at 19 degrees Celsius.

The rule of thumb is to shut off anything that might freeze and/or fracture a pipe. I don’t recommend shutting off main water valve since you may have items such as automatic humidifiers that require water. Consider installing a device called The FloodStopper? that detects water appliance and plumbing failure or accidental floods and immediately turns off the water supply. For more information, go to their website: thefloodstopper.com.

© The Vancouver Province 2008

 

The new Internet millionaires

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

Big bucks still to be made years after dot-com crash

Lena Sin
Province

Markus Frind, founder of online dating site PlentyofFish.com, works two hours a day and may earn $10 million this year. Photograph by : Arlen Redekop, The Province

John Chow earns money on the Internet blogging about how others can do the same.

He works two hours a day and makes as much as $10 million a year.

That’s why Markus Frind is already considered a dot-com legend at the ripe old age of 29.

Frind is the sole owner of Plentyof

Fish.com, one of the most popular online dating sites in Canada, the U.S. and the U.K.

Running his matchmaking business from his 83-square-metre apartment in downtown Vancouver, Frind is a one-man show in a business many thought was impossible to do solo.

It’s little wonder, then, that the likes of Guy Kawasaki, a well-known American venture capitalist, author and Forbes columnist, has hailed Frind a personal “hero.”

But Frind is by no means the first British Columbian to become an Internet mogul.

Fellow Vancouverite Kevin Ham has an Internet portfolio of domain names worth an estimated $300 million, while Richmond blogger John Chow found online riches through his popular blog.

Then there’s Vancouver couple Caterina Fake and Stewart Butterfield, creators of photo-sharing site Flickr, which was sold to Yahoo in 2005 for a rumoured $40 million.

Frind is now making his splash in the online dating industry, taking on heavyweights such as Lavalife.com, which employs no less than five vice-presidents and a string of chief officers.

“The most remarkable thing to me is this one person is able to make up to $10 million a year all by himself. It’s unheard of,” says Joe Tracy, editor of the industry publication Online Dating Magazine.

Frind’s success is largely due to the fact that he’s figured out a way to run his site on autopilot.

While other companies hire reams of programmers and marketers, Frind has just one assistant he recently hired to respond to e-mails.

“Other free sites fail because they can’t control their costs. My costs are pretty much zero,” he says, sitting in his Coal Harbour apartment that’s decorated with Ikea art and mismatched couches.

Growing up on a farm in Hudson‘s Hope, 90 kilometres west of Fort St. John on the banks of the Peace River, Frind was always more interested in computers than cattle, says his mother, Erika.

After high school, Frind immediately left his “500-person town” to learn computer programming at the B.C. Institute of Technology in Burnaby.

He graduated in 1999 at the tail end of the dot-com bubble, a period marked by spectacular Internet business failures.

“I was jumping from job to job,” he says. “And every six months, the company would go under.”

Plenty of Fish was launched in 2003 as a pet project for Frind, who was trying to learn a new programming language called ASP.NET. He chose to build an online dating site for its dynamic platform.

From the outset, Plenty of Fish was offered as a free site, unlike most dating sites at the time.

Traffic grew fast, mostly through word of mouth. He decided to sign up with Google AdSense, which supplies web publishers with advertising, to see how far he could take Plenty of Fish.

The first cheque arrived in July 2003.

“I made $1,100 and I thought, if I made this four or five times bigger, I won’t have to work again,” says Frind.

Indeed, Frind doesn’t have to work again. He makes upwards of $5 million a year and is projected to take in $10 million this year, he says.

Revenue comes from banner ads, Google-supplied ads and “affiliate” marketing links that send users to other dating sites.

There are about 660,000 active users — 40,000 of them from B.C.

It ranks in the top three busiest dating sites in Canada, according to comScore Media. According to Hitwise, by some measures — time spent on the site, for example — it ranks No. 1 in the U.S. and U.K.

Its appeal? The site is far from slick — but it’s free and the search engine works better than others, Frind says.

“Everyone lies about what they want, or they don’t know what they want,” he says. “I look at who they’re messaging, not what they’re saying.”

Frind’s program monitors people’s behaviour and tailors search results accordingly. For example, if you’re messaging a lot of people who don’t post pictures of themselves, his program will pick up that quirk and return more results of people in that category.

He’s also a stickler for originality. The program automatically detects lazy users who write a single message, then cut-and-paste to send the message en masse to potential dates.

“People who swear too much get deleted,” Frind adds. “Unoriginal users? Delete.”

Frind, who’s never tried online dating himself and met his girlfriend at his last job, has his eyes set on moving into the Chinese and European markets one day.

He says he barely notices the cash that rolls in and is more interested in growing than making money.

“I’m driven,” he concedes. “It’s just fun winning. I feel like I’m playing a video game. There’s always another level.”

© The Vancouver Province 2008

 

The Beasley – High density, heritage and preservation

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

Historical building on site will become a lounge but retain its original fa

Let your lawyer vet that presale deal

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

Tony Gioventu
Province

Dear Condo Smarts: With all the media coverage recently about presales going badly, we were wondering if you could answer a question for us. We took possession of our presales home in the fall, and everything with the sale went very well. The price was the same, the product was delivered on time and our unit was what we had anticipated.

Our strata does have a very real problem, however, with the parking. The developer intended on most of the presales to provide each person with two parking spaces, but now we discover there is barely enough for one parking space per unit.

Most owners we’ve spoken to are furious. Many have two cars and are having to either sell one or rent parking in a neighbouring parkade. Do we have any recourse ? Our real estate agent has told us a parking spot in downtown Vancouver downtown can be worth $25,000 or more.

— JG, Vancouver

Dear JG: Presales have a significant inventory of limitations and exemptions. When anyone buys a presale, they are not buying real estate. They are entering into an agreement with the developer for the right to purchase that real estate when the property is finally complete and the titles are created for conveyance.

The price, what you are buying and any terms or conditions in that contract are all part of the negotiations. Take great care in purchasing a presale agreement, though. As the first purchaser/party to the contract, you have seven days to reconsider your decision and have your deposit returned.

If you want to ensure you have a decent deal and reasonable security in the agreement, you must take your agreement to your lawyer for legal review before the seven days is up. Everything on a presale is negotiated and most, if not all, conditions may be subject to change, alteration, price increases, exemptions, exclusion or outright cancellation of the contract.

So, in many ways, a presale is a speculative investment and, along with that, come all of the risks of speculation.

Subsequent assignments (buyers) should also understand that only the original deposit by the first purchaser is secured, either in trust or by way of deposit insurance.

In simple terms, the first presales buyer can sell their presales agreement to another person. If their original deposit was $50,000 and they sell the agreement to a second person for $100,000 and make $50,000 profit, the only protection for the second purchaser is for the original $50,000. Any increase above the original deposit is not protected and at risk if the project is cancelled.

I did manage to obtain a copy of the presales agreement for JG’s building, and there is a limitation for parking. “Subject to availability and cost of construction, up to two parking spaces may be negotiated for a strata lot. Parking may be limited by zoning and construction limitations and will not be confirmed until final sale.”

The final sales agreements only included one parking space. It’s more than “buyer beware.”

Presales buyers must review every document, amendment and the final sales agreement before they proceed. Seek professional guidance and be prepared for the risks.

Tony Gioventu is executive director of the Condominium Home Owners Association. Contact CHOA at 604-584-2462 or toll-free at 1-877-353-2462, or e-mail [email protected]

© The Vancouver Province 2008

 

EcoDensity debate illuminating, inspiring and despairing

Saturday, March 8th, 2008

The city as ‘humanity’s supreme achievement,’ our country as the supreme arbiter of growth our country

Bob Ransford
Sun

Over the last couple of weeks, I watched the debate over EcoDensity in Vancouver play out at a city-sponsored public hearing.

Two different speakers made a particular impression on me. One inspired me and reminded me that people do care about things that happen outside the walls of their home and they are prepared to contribute in a positive way to building community. The other left me with an awful feeling bordering on hopeless despair.

I spend a lot of time in my line of work listening to people express their fears and concerns about the change that inevitably comes with urban growth. Most public meetings about development in the city only attract the complainers and those trying to stop progress.

Those who feel that their backyard is threatened seem to get motivated enough to put down the TV remote and get off the couch.

Few, however, are willing to miss their weekly sitcom or reality TV thriller and come out to a public meeting to contribute constructively or to offer positive support for well-planned growth.

The current debate in Vancouver about EcoDensity has been a little different. The idea of adopting compact settlement patterns and ecological performance as determinants in planning for new growth in the city has elevated the issue of urban development to a level we haven’t seen in this city for many years.

Peter Oberlander, the 86-year-old Harvard-educated planner who started UBC’s graduate school of community and regional planning more than 50 years ago, kicked off the public hearing with a thoughtful presentation about the history of the city as an idea and an ideal that has shaped civilization.

His appearance was a reminder of the power of public participation in community building.

For it was in the same city council chamber about 40 years ago that Oberlander resigned as chairman of the city’s citizen-led Planning Commission in protest of a council decision. His resignation and the public protests that it spawned back then eventually led to the council of the day reversing their decision to run a massive freeway system through Vancouver‘s downtown core.

That decision has shaped the livable city we enjoy today. Thanks to the lack of a huge disruptive freeway system running through the downtown, unlike most other North American cities, people can actually find it enjoyable to work, play and live in our inner city.

Oberlander lauded the EcoDensity initiative, dismissing fears about continued urban growth, reminding everyone that “the city is humanity’s supreme achievement.”

He said more compact settlement patterns are inevitable in the evolution of a city, especially when we are committed to preserving agricultural land and other valuable open space.

Not everyone appearing at the public meeting was as positive about the future of our city as Oberlander.

A number of speakers expressed the typical NIMBY concerns, their tone echoing the familiar refrain “my life is just fine, the drawbridge is now raised, my neighbourhood doesn’t need to change, I don’t care where my kids are going to live”.

But it was Vancouver resident Dan Murray, with his radical ideas about requesting that the federal and provincial governments conduct an environmental impact assessment around urban population growth that really made me wonder about how selfish many urban dwellers have become. The drawbridge mentality of those who think that we can resist the global flow of population and somehow sustain our lifestyle speaks volumes about how the concept of community has little currency in our fast-paced materialistic urban world.

Murray went so far as to suggest that the city should be lobbying the federal government to drastically curtail immigration numbers so that Metro Vancouver could say no to further growth.

He didn’t explain how his kids and everyone else’s kids might be able to afford to live in a city where no new housing would be built.

He didn’t answer what would happen to our quality of life if we had a massive labour shortage with our rapidly aging population.

Perhaps he and the others who espouse the idea of halting growth in its tracks really don’t care what impact that might have on future generations. After all, they are happy in their own backyards.

Bob Ransford is a public affairs consultant with COUNTERPOINT Communications Inc. He is a former real estate developer who specializes in urban land use issues. E-mail: [email protected]

© The Vancouver Sun 2008

 

Sophia at 298 E 11th we can learn, for example about pre-completion caution

Saturday, March 8th, 2008

We can learn, for example, about pre-completion caution

Peter Simpson
Sun

Sophia is the third new-home project that the Eden Group has abandoned. It is also almost ready for occupancy. One leader of the local development and residential-construction industry says he would consider selling his personal home before he would subject his customers to the uncertainty of a receivership.

CONSTRUCTIVE THOUGHTS

As I was driving to BC Place two Saturdays ago, my thoughts were focused on the final two days of the home show. The sun was shining, the air was still — ideal conditions for many outdoor activities revered by folks here in Lotusland-by-the-Sea, but not so good for attendance at indoor shows.

As I neared the stadium, storm clouds appeared, via my cellphone. Shannon Patterson, a hard-working reporter from CTV, called to ask if I had heard that Sophia, an 81-unit condo project in Vancouver‘s Mount Pleasant neighbourhood, was placed in receivership. No, I told her.

When I returned home that evening I discussed the issue with my wife, telling her I was feeling quite disconcerted. I said if I am that gloomy, I can’t imagine what those 81 purchasers were feeling. They, too, found out about the receivership that day, most of them long after I was informed of it.

85-per-cent built

An attractive eight-storey building, Sophia now sits idle, 85-per-cent complete, more than two years after the first sales were achieved in 2005. David Bowra of the Bowra Group is the court-appointed receiver, the same guy who was receiver for the ill-fated Riverbend development last year.

Just after this column was filed (darned editorial deadlines), Bowra submitted his recommendations to the B.C. Supreme Court for its consideration and judgement. A court date has yet to be set.

Developer Bill Eden of the Eden Group said he ran out of viable options, attributing the receivership to ongoing problems with higher-than-anticipated labour costs, a three-month strike by Vancouver civic workers, delays in the city’s approvals process, and mounting financing challenges.

This is not the first time the Eden Group has cancelled a project. Last fall, two Vancouver projects were cancelled, both before a shovel entered the ground. At the time, I commented that the cancellations were appropriate since the purchasers — mostly investors — only bought in two to three months prior and delaying the inevitable would have mired the developer and purchasers in financial quicksand.

Not so with the Sophia situation. Many people are affected significantly by the receivership. Some have waited more than two years to move into their condos, located in an up-and-coming, vibrant neighbourhood. Predictably, they are experiencing a range of emotions: sadness, anger and confusion.

Claire Munroe and partner Josh Alter, both 27, purchased their one-bedroom condo in early 2006. Their projected possession date was the summer of 2007, then winter of 2007, then this month, then spring.

The delays were disappointing but tolerated because the sheer volume of construction activity in the Lower Mainland, including a shortage of skilled labour, was well documented.

Munroe said she and Alter just celebrated their fifth anniversary together and were looking forward to moving from their Kitsilano rental and taking their first step onto the home ownership ladder.

“We already shop and dine in the neighbourhood and were excited about being part of our new community,” said Munroe. “Hopefully, the judge orders the completion of the building and allows us to complete the purchase of our condo at the price we paid two years ago. Right now we are riding a roller coaster of emotions; it’s not a good feeling knowing our future is uncertain,” she said.

Bright, articulate and feisty, Kristen Gray is just 22 and has been saving for her first home since she was 16. Gray works for a prominent residential developer who has allowed Kristen time at work to spearhead efforts to contact other purchasers to establish e-mail information chains and organize meetings where they can discuss the receivership process and possible outcomes.

‘My dream house’

“I did lots of research before I bought at Sophia. This was supposed to be my dream home. I bought furniture and made plans for the move. Just in case, I spent last weekend looking at other condos all over Vancouver but, you know, I couldn’t find a single place I would rather live,” said Gray.

Gray purchased her condo on assignment last August from an original purchaser. She paid the market value of the condo at that time, essentially remitting to the seller the lift (profit) in real estate values since the original purchase (eg., if the original purchase price was $250,000 and the condo is now valued at $350,000, the lift is $100,000).

In Gray’s case, she paid the lift applicable to her unit and the down payment to take over the contract. Thankfully, both lift and deposit are held in trust.

No such luck for Michael Nowak and family. In October, Nowak, 33, and his wife Paulina, who have a seven-month-old daughter, sold their home in Windsor, Ont. and moved to a Vancouver apartment.

Like Gray, Nowak purchased a condo from an original purchaser, but, unlike Gray, he did not have the lift ($120,000) and deposit ($16,000) placed in trust.

He paid the seller cash, up-front, so if the judge decides Sophia will be completed but purchasers must kick in thousands more to secure their homes, Nowak might have no choice but to pay the extra cash. He is currently seeking legal advice.

‘Such nice people’

“Originally I was stressed out. I felt swindled. Now, after meeting all the other purchasers, my family is actually looking forward to moving into the building. They are all such nice, friendly people, it will be great to have them as neighbours. That is, of course, if all goes well in court,” said Nowak.

Which begs the question, are assignments problematic? Some developers allow them while others do not. “Our purchase-and-sale agreements only allow for assignment with our written consent once the building is 100 per cent sold out,” said David Podmore, president of Concert Properties.

Podmore added he would consider selling his personal home before he subjected his purchasers to the trauma and uncertainty of a receivership action.

So, what is to become of Sophia purchasers? B.C. Supreme Court will decide, likely this month. My strong desire is that the purchasers — cash-strapped first-time buyers, downsizing empty- nesters, move-up buyers or investors alike — will get their condos at the price they paid for them. That would be a fair and just outcome. I also hope the beleaguered developer is able to resolve his challenges.

The receivership has upset the development industry and, understandably, has cast a shadow over the pre-sales process. Rest assured the sky is not falling, and pre-sales will remain a reality. Developers must achieve a certain number of pre-sales before lending institutions will advance development financing. The pre-sales threshold depends on the relationship between the developer and banker.

To put this situation into perspective, although there have been four such receiverships over the past year or so, they are unusual. I realize this fact is cold comfort to the Sophia purchasers, but more than 78,000 new homes and condominiums have been sold, built and delivered to the purchasers without incident and for the contract price during the past four years in the Lower Mainland alone.

There have been those, mainly occupying the Opposition seats in the B.C. Legislature, who are calling for provincial legislation to prevent situations like Riverbend and Sophia. Please, no political grandstanding. The court and existing regulatory agencies provide mechanisms for resolution.

And how would the provincial government act if, God forbid, the real-estate market collapses, and values drop well below both the purchase price and mortgage amount, as is currently the case in many U.S. markets? Will there be calls for new laws to prevent purchasers from walking away from their deposits and collapsing pre-sales deals, leaving developers saddled with completed and unsold condo projects? Note to legislators: The pre-sale issue falls into the double-edged sword category.

Condo buyers must do their homework before they sign on the dotted line. Find out if the developer has a history of building and delivering homes at the agreed price. Length of time in the business is a good yardstick, but many relatively new developers are quickly establishing excellent reputations.

Buying a new condo is an exciting experience. You line up for hours, sometimes days, for a chance to secure a preferred unit at a price affordable to you. But after the celebration, set aside time for sober thought. Have a real-estate lawyer review your contract. If there are any clauses identified as problematic, go back to the developer’s sales centre for clarification.

B.C. law provides you with a seven-day right of rescission, during which you can cancel the sales contract, for whatever reason. After that, your deal is binding, so make good use of that week.

Disclosure statements now must include information, in conspicuous type, about a developer’s history of receiverships, bankruptcies, fraud or other worrisome legal and contractual issues.

If you are considering taking that important step into homeownership in the near future, you might want to attend the Greater Vancouver Home Builders’ Association’s 14th annual free seminar for first-time home buyers on Tuesday, April 8. It is the largest seminar of its kind in North America, attracting more than 850 first-timers. A blue-ribbon panel of speakers will provide expert guidance.

As seminar moderator, I will ensure the condo pre-sale process is discussed in detail. The Vancouver Sun and Homeowner Protection Office are among the sponsors. For details, visit www.gvhba.org.

Peter Simpson is chief executive officer of the Greater Vancouver Home Builders’ Association. E-mail [email protected]

© The Vancouver Sun 2008

 

Top Canadian firm gets nod to design glitzy Ritz-Carlton

Saturday, March 8th, 2008

Yabu Pushelberg has designed major hotel and commercial properties throughout the world

Bruce Constantineau
Sun

interior designer Glenn Pushelberg, who is designing the new Ritz-Carlton, envisions a glamorous hotel with a subtle West Coast feel. Photograph by : Bill Keay, Vancouver Sun

Interior design firm Yabu Pushelberg created this display for the Lane Crawford luxury department store in Beijing.

Renowned Canadian interior design firm Yabu Pushelberg will design the upscale Ritz-Carlton hotel scheduled to open in Vancouver by 2011.

Snaring the company is considered a significant coup for the project, as the firm — with offices in Toronto and New York — has designed major hotel and commercial properties throughout the world.

Glenn Pushelberg, who co-founded the company with George Yabu in 1980, envisions a hotel that’s “sophisticated and a little bit glamorous” with a subtle West Coast feel.

“I think there’s a lot of plagiarism in the hotel world and things can get a bit trite,” he said in an interview Friday. “Not that it’s bad but I’ve told (our team) don’t make it look like the Vancouver airport because that’s too obvious.

“At the same time, there are materials and processes that are intrinsic to the place and feel comfortable but it should be less obvious.”

The 127-room Ritz-Carlton hotel will occupy the first 20 floors of a new 60-storey, Arthur Erickson-designed twisting tower at 1133 West Georgia. The $500-million-plus hotel-condo project is being developed by the Holborn Group, controlled by Vancouver entrepreneur Simon Lim.

Yabu Pushelberg’s project list is impressive. After designing the new Tiffany store on Wall Street and the W Hotel in Times Square, the company is working on six new hotel projects throughout New York.

It also designed the hyper-chic, 77-room Hazelton Hotel in Toronto — widely touted to become that city’s first-ever five-diamond-rated property.

Toronto didn’t have any glamorous hotels so we gave them something glamorous,” Pushelberg said. “We saw the Hazelton as more European, with spaces that are smaller and more intimate.”

The Ritz-Carlton hotel is his company’s first Vancouver project since designing the Leone store in the 1980s. Pushelberg said he’s excited at the chance to work with Erickson, who touted Yabu Pushelberg’s abilities to the U.S. media after finding out the company designed the Leone outlet.

“We had never met him but he arranged this dinner in Toronto to introduce us to the American media,” he said. “So we have always wanted to do a project with Arthur, who is an incredibly talented architect.”

Pushelberg, 54, feels every hotel project needs its own “visual language” and thinks the Vancouver Ritz-Carlton tower’s iconic architecture will draw people from a distance.

“We think the hotel needs to kind of segue from something iconic to something emotional because hotel experiences are emotional experiences,” he said.

The unique Erickson twisting design of the building will throw more than a few curves at the Yabu Pushelberg team.

“It’s a design challenge because every room is different, which forces you to make many different layouts,” Pushelberg said. “From a guest point of view, it will be interesting because when you go back, you will always have a new experience.”

He said hotels are very much public social spaces now so he expects the Ritz-Carlton lobby will feature contrasts, a “point of view,” comfortable seating and a mix of beautiful art and unique architecture.

Pushelberg feels Ritz-Carlton is searching for the “new luxury” as it breaks out of its old “Americana” mold.

“There was a time in the 1980s when the guys that ran the show were designing for themselves,” he said. “But those guys are in their 70s now and its people in their 30s to 50s who are the customers and they’re looking for a new point of view in luxury.”

Though not a big fan of the term “world class,” Pushelberg feels Vancouver has a lot going for it now — incredible outdoor activities, a diverse population, a great urban fabric, a good stock of architecture and a West Coast point of view.

“There are a lot of strengths here and we want to contribute to that to make a lovely hotel for Vancouver,” he said.

© The Vancouver Sun 2008