Archive for July, 2008

B.C.’s leaky condo crisis far from over, report says

Wednesday, July 9th, 2008

Number of ‘rotten’ homes much higher than ex

William Boei, with files from Derrick Penner
Sun

Repair costs are skyrocketing because of construction cost inflation of 10 per cent last year and an expected eight per cent this year. Photograph by : Steve Bosch, Vancouver Sun

Coastal British Columbia‘s leaky condo crisis is far from over, a recent report prepared for the provincial government shows.

The report acknowledges for the first time that thousands more strata-owned apartment units suffered water damage than the government has been estimating.

By 2012, when the leaky condo era enters its fourth decade, as many as one-third of the defective units will remain unrepaired, said the report, prepared for the province’s Homeowner Protection Office (HPO) by private consultants.

At least 45 per cent and possibly as many as 68 per cent of leaky buildings have not been repaired yet, according to various scenarios explored by the consultants.

They also revealed that of the nearly 160,000 strata-owned apartment units built during the leaky condo period — considered to date from 1982 to 1999 — 45 to 55 per cent have suffered “premature building envelope failure.”

James Balderson, spokesman for the Coalition of Leaky Condo Owners, said the report helps to reveal the magnitude of the leaky condo problem, which he always thought was being underestimated.

However, Balderson says the HPO report, written by the consulting firm McClanaghan and Associates, still underestimates the number of condominium units that are likely to suffer problems with leaks.

“I’ve been saying that for years,” Balderson said in an interview. “The Homeowner Protection Office has underestimated [and] under-reported the number of leaky, rotten condos.”

He said the number of affected units will continue to be underreported because the cut-off points for drops in value and the time frame of construction the HPO uses to determine which buildings qualify for assistance mean it excludes many leaky homes.

HPO chief executive Ken Cameron and Housing Minister Rich Coleman could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

The new report said at least 72,000 strata units leaked and suffered water damage, and possibly as many as 87,500.

The HPO and the provincial government insisted for many years that no more than 65,000 strata apartments were damaged, including all the ones that had not been discovered yet.

The report said officials now realize they still don’t know “the full extent of building envelope failure.”

The consultants made no attempt to estimate the total cost of the damage, but concluded that early estimates of the repair cost per unit — $10,000 to $15,000 — were far too low.

“Based on the HPO experience, it would appear that the actual average repair costs are approximately five times or six times higher,” they said.

By last September, repair loans the HPO makes to leaky condo owners had grown to an average of $62,000 for wood-frame apartments, and $72,000 for those in concrete buildings.

The repair costs continue to escalate because of construction cost inflation, 10 per cent last year and expected to be eight per cent this year, the consultants added.

The report’s findings were based in part on the HPO’s repair loan statistics — it has been making repair loans since 1999 — and in part on B.C. Assessment Authority records of units that suffered a sudden drop in assessed value of 15 per cent or more, a likely sign of building envelope failure.

Nearly a decade ago, the HPO estimated that the 65,000 units it then said were damaged would cost $1.5 billion to repair. The consultants did not provide a new number, but based on The Sun’s extrapolations of their scenarios, it appears the complete repair cost for strata apartments alone is in the range of $3 billion to $4 billion.

The consultants’ report was presented to the HPO last December, but was not distributed to the media and not posted on the HPO’s website, although an executive summary was posted. It took persistent requests from The Vancouver Sun to obtain a full copy of the report.

It said 159,979 strata units were built during the leaky condo period. Based on a moderate estimate of 72,000 leakers, 45 per cent of those units were defective.

The higher estimate of 87,500 problem units suggests 55 per cent of strata units built during the period suffered building envelope failure.

Some 30,000 homes have already been repaired, but at least 42,000 others still require major reconstruction, the report said. In the report’s worst-case scenario, 68 per cent of leaky condos have not been repaired yet.

Concrete highrises have been slower to show water problems than wood-frame buildings, and the report said six to 10 highrises, often with 100 or more units per building, are being added to the leaky lists each year.

“A small increase in the number of buildings from this segment could have a significant impact on the HPO reconstruction program,” it said. In a background paper, the HPO said it expected “demand for assistance will likely remain high for the foreseeable future.”

The consultants’ report said the percentage of units in leaky buildings whose owners need financial help to make repairs has risen in the last three years from just under 40 per cent to nearly 49 per cent. Eight-one per cent of HPO repair loans have been for units in wood-frame buildings, and the rest for concrete.

© The Vancouver Sun 2008

 

Canadian building permits show surprise increase

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Back-to-back hike could point to busier work sites

Province

OTTAWA — The value of Canadian building permits rose unexpectedly in May — the second consecutive monthly gain — as an increase in non-residential construction plans outweighed a drop in the residential sector, Statistics Canada said yesterday.

Permits issued by municipalities rose 1.1 per cent to $6.6 billion during the month, the highest level since October 2007, the federal agency said.

“It was the first back-to-back increase in construction intentions since November 2006, and could point to busy construction sites in the coming months,” the agency said.

“The value of building permits has followed an upward trend since the beginning of the year.”

In dollar terms, Ontario posted the largest increase, followed by B.C. and New Brunswick. Permits in Ontario rose 3.1 per cent to a value of $2.5 billion. This was primarily driven by a 26.4-per-cent jump in the value of construction intentions for non-residential buildings, said the agency.

In May, the non-residential sector in the province was at its fourth-highest value since January 1989.

Many analysts had expected a decline of as much as six per cent in permits in May, given the recent softening in the housing market.

Non-residential permits were up 12.8 per cent to $2.9 billion in May.

© The Vancouver Province 2008

Canadians consumers face triple lock on Apple iPhone

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Michael Geist
Sun

The imminent arrival of the iPhone in Canada has unleashed a storm of controversy over the country’s high wireless data rates and left consumers bewildered by an array of offerings that — if misunderstood…

More than one year after the Apple iPhone hit store shelves in the United States, the hugely popular device makes its Canadian debut on Friday. The arrival of a Canadian iPhone is expected to generate long lines at Rogers Wireless stores, though the pre-launch publicity has not been particularly smooth for the company. Its announcement of iPhone service pricing set off a wave of online protest, as consumers noted the absence of an unlimited data plan, higher prices, and longer contractual commitments.

The Rogers offer is not particularly surprising. Canada ranks toward the very bottom among developed countries for cellphone usage as the lack of competition leaves Canadians with some of the highest prices for wireless services in the world. Indeed, Rogers has a monopoly on the iPhone, since it is the only Canadian carrier currently capable of carrying the device.

Most of the public criticism has focused on the uncompetitive data rates that render it difficult to maximize the iPhone’s potential. Yet the bigger story is how the Canadian version of the device features a triple lock that is the result of onerous contracts, technological locks, and a legislative proposal from Industry Minister Jim Prentice that simultaneously locks consumers in, while locking the competition out.

The effect of locking out the competition is particularly striking since recent Canadian policy has emphasized the need to provide consumers with greater mobility and choice.

The government has introduced wireless number portability that theoretically allows consumers to switch providers but retain their phone number. It has also conducted a successful spectrum auction that may yield future competitors. In spite of those efforts, the Rogers release of the iPhone is the poster child for how these policy initiatives have failed.

The first lock on the iPhone is the contractual lock-in that comes from a mandatory three-year contract. This is the longest mandatory contract in the world for the iPhone and it comes with huge penalties for consumers that seek early termination. While the contract guarantees Rogers a steady three-year revenue stream, it also means that for most consumers the actual cost of the iPhone is at least 10 times the $199 sticker price.

This contractual lock is a direct result of the absence of competition and government inaction. In the United States, AT&T (the exclusive iPhone carrier in that country) has announced plans to offer the option of purchasing an iPhone at a higher price with no long-term contract attached. South Africa has gone even further, recently enacting regulations that limit cellphone contracts to a maximum of two years.

The second lock is a technological lock that restricts the device to the Rogers network (and Rogers approved roaming partners). This provides Rogers with another guaranteed revenue stream for consumers who wish to use their device in other countries and effectively locks consumers out of wireless number portability should a GSM competitor enter the Canadian market. While Canadian law remains silent on this issue, other countries, including France and South Africa, have mandated that carriers offer consumers the option of an unlocked device.

The third lock involves a legal lock against unlocking cellphones. Ironically, while other countries use laws to unlock consumers, Prentice has proposed locking them in. Bill C-61 would make it a violation for Canadians to unlock their cellphones and bans the distribution of software programs that could be used to do so.

The United States has recognized the need to specifically exempt cellphones from locking provisions, yet months after claiming to prioritize consumers interests, Prentice’s bill is silent on the issue.

On Friday. many Canadian consumers will undoubtedly overcome the sticker shock that comes with a phone that requires a financial commitment that runs into the thousands of dollars. However, lurking behind the cost is a “made in Canada” triple lock that seems unlikely to be broken.

Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. He can reached at [email protected] or online at www.michaelgeist.ca.

© The Vancouver Sun 2008

 

iPhone fever gives way to iPhone fury as petitions grow

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Anger fuels rumours that Apple is reducing the number of phones it plans to send to Canada

Gillian Shaw
Sun

The imminent arrival of the iPhone in Canada has unleashed a storm of controversy over the country’s high wireless data rates and left consumers bewildered by an array of offerings which, if mishandled, could leave them with a monthly phone bill higher than the price of a house in Saskatchewan.

iPhone fever has given way to iPhone fury with almost 50,000 people signing a petition slated to go to Rogers this Friday, the day Apple’s new iPhone is released.

As well, a new list was launched Monday of people planning to cancel their Rogers service. Within hours of its launch at www.ruinediphone.com, the list had 100 Rogers customers and growing saying they would quit Rogers.

Rogers is not only ripping you off with the iPhone plans, but also with their regular ‘mega value’ plans,” wrote one participant, Justin Giles. “I would have liked to get an iPhone, but that dream is now ruined. Too bad, because I’ve been a Rogers customer for over eight years, and now I will never go back unless something drastic changes!”

The situation is fuelling online rumours, such as that Apple is reducing the number of iPhones it plans to ship to Canada. Apple didn’t return calls.

Alberta oilfield worker Piotr Staniaszek, a pre-iPhone victim of wireless data limits, probably could have picked up a couple of real estate properties in some parts of the country for a bill that reached almost $60,000 one month, climbing to $85,000 by the next.

That was last December and Staniaszek and his wireless carrier, Bell Mobility, later negotiated the killer bill down to $3,000-plus. But critics say the current hodgepodge of data pricing, plagued by small print and unexpected charges, can only lead to more such digital disasters.

“We’re getting piles of complaints,” said Bruce Cran, president of the Consumers’ Association of Canada. “We’re classifying this as another rip-off of Canadian consumers.

“Why we are getting this totally inferior deal to what they are getting in the United States doesn’t make sense.”

Both Bell Mobility and Telus Mobility appear ready to capitalize on the proposed boycott of the iPhone and Rogers with rival offerings that come with flat-rate, unlimited Web browsing and

e-mail. The only company apparently unmoved by the consumer revolt is Rogers, with company spokeswoman Liz Hamilton saying Monday there are no plans to include an unlimited data service for the iPhone.

“We don’t believe an unlimited plan is the best value for our customers,” Hamilton said. “Other carriers have made other choices and you have to talk to them about what those choices are.”

Bell announced the Aug. 8 introduction of the Samsung Instinct smartphone. Instinct users can get a $10 unlimited mobile browser plan from Bell for Internet surfing and e-mail. With the Instinct selling for as low as $149.99 and customers able to get a voice package with unlimited data for as low as $40, Bell is aggressively undercutting Rogers’ iPhone offerings, which start at $75 for voice plan with 750 megabytes of data, and top out at the heftiest two-gigabyte-plus voice plan for $115.

Telus has weighed in with the promise of the HTC Diamond, to be released later this summer, also $149.99 with a three-year contract and the ability to use Telus‘ $15 data plan for unlimited e-mail and instant messaging or a $30 plan that adds Web browsing to that. Telus also plans to introduce Samsung’s Instinct.

But even Bell and Telus‘ unlimited plans come with conditions and fine print that could leave customers confused over whether they’ll pay extra for such services as streaming video, text messages and other features.

“They [wireless carriers] deliberately make it very difficult to make comparisons,” said Cran. “To be safe you really need to have an unlimited plan.”

In the U.S., where AT&T is the network that carries the iPhone, customers can get unlimited data at a flat rate with prices that vary depending on the number of voice minutes, starting at $70 with the top plan $110.

In Canada, iPhone users will have to know how many megabytes the websites they are cruising add up to, how much watching a one-minute YouTube video will cut into their data allotment or if those holiday snapshots from well-meaning relatives are going to put them over the edge.

Rogers will send users a message warning when they reach 80 per cent of their plans’ capacity and when they have used it up, but if iPhone buyers discover after a month that the cost is way too high to justify running their new phone, they’ll face hefty penalties if they want to get out of the three-year contracts.

Head out of the country and the surprises could be even more painful to the pocketbook.

“Substantial charges may be incurred if your iPhone is taken out of Canada, even if no services are intentionally used,” reads Rogers‘ fine print on the iPhone.

“People are going to have to be very cautious here,” Cran said.

At ruinediphone.com, which is gathering signatures for the petition being presented Friday, site founder James Hallen has been replaced by web designers and marketers Jamie Lynch and Robert Sheinbein, who said they stepped in when the site was overwhelmed by traffic.

The pair have put their money where their mouths are when it comes to their wireless accounts, using Verizon from the U.S. for their company BlackBerries in a move they said cut their monthly wireless bill from the average of $2,000-$2,500 a month they were paying Rogers to $700-$800 a month.

They said while individual consumers must be able to present a U.S. address to get the service, they were able to get it since they have business operations in the U.S. Unlimited long distance and unlimited roaming included in their service means they can use their BlackBerries in Canada without incurring extra costs.

With Canadian plans, however, “it just takes one bill to wipe your budget out,” Sheinbein said.

© The Vancouver Sun 2008

 

Telus, Bell to charge users for incoming text messages

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Customers steamed, but companies say they need more money to provide service

Andy Ivens
Province

Matt Jenkins, 25, of Vancouver isn’t impressed with plans to charge for incoming text messages. Ric Ernst – The Province

Cellphone users are about to be hit with new fees as two of Canada‘s telecommunications giants bring in a levy on incoming text messages.

Bell Mobility will begin charging 15 cents per incoming text message on Aug. 8. Telus Mobility will do the same from Aug. 24.

Until now, their pay-per-use customers who send messages have been charged 15 cents per message, but it hasn’t cost anything to receive them.

Shawn Hall of Telus in Vancouver said the cost of accommodating text messaging has ballooned in recent years.

“Canadians send 45 million text messages a day,” said Hall. “That has created a tremendous strain on our network and we can no longer afford to provide the service for free.”

He said that, for $30 a month, customers can buy a cellphone plan that gives them unlimited sending and receiving of text messages, Internet access and e-mail.

“For customers who don’t do a lot of text messaging, they have the option of paying this 15 cents,” he said.

“As for unwanted text messages, consumers have nothing to worry about.

“We have had, for a number of years, really robust security filters in place that block millions of spam text messages a month.

“Generally speaking, our customers don’t receive text spam.”

And, he said, if you do receive text spam, “we’ll take the charge off your bill, no problem.”

The new charge has sparked outrage on blogs.

“This charge is unbelievable. If someone sends me spam on my Bell phone, I have to pay for it? I made the mistake of giving my cellphone number to a car rental agency and now I get spam text messages,” a Bell customer ranted on a technology blog.

“I actually work for Bell and I think this incoming text messages being charged is bogus!” posted another.

Bell and Telus customers can avoid the charge by switching to Rogers, which says it has no plans to institute a fee to receive a text message. But Bell and Telus charge penalties of up to $400 if customers break their contracts.

Elizabeth Hamilton, Rogers spokeswoman, said: “We just don’t charge for it, and have no plans to. Now it’s a unique differentiator for Rogers.”

Matt Jenkins, 25, of Vancouver, isn’t impressed by the text-messaging charges.

“Oh, painful,” he groaned. “Information is supposed to be free.”

Said Jennifer Woodroff, 47, of Vancouver: “That’s ridiculous. It’s like another tax.

“[Friends] text you constantly with stupid things like, ‘What RU doin‘?’ “

Chris Mack, 26, a Bell customer, is not relishing the prospect of paying the new charge: “I’m not happy with that.”

But the new fees don’t bother Ken Nam of Vancouver.

“I bought the Fun Bundle and pay a few bucks every month for unlimited text messaging. It costs about $5,” said Nam, 26. “I’m quite happy with Telus.”

Allen Mendez of Coquitlam said the new charges are reasonable.

“I think a lot of people use text messaging more than talking [on their cellphones] anyway,” said Mendez, 26.

Mendez said the fee might prompt people to think twice before giving a stranger their cellphone number.

“The only people who have my number are the people who I want to [receive] text messages from.”

© The Vancouver Province 2008

 

RBC Economic Report for July 2008

Monday, July 7th, 2008

Other

Download Document

Foreclosures to rise whoever wins White House

Sunday, July 6th, 2008

Jeannine Aversa
USA Today

A foreclosed home is seen for sale in Sacramento By Rich Pedroncelli, AP

WASHINGTON — Home foreclosures will keep rising next year no matter who is elected president in November.

Even the optimism that surrounds a new president taking office can’t resurrect home values overnight, and presidents have no direct ability to reduce rising mortgage rates. Nevertheless, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain both promise help for homeowners facing foreclosure.

Obama calls for a broader role for government than McCain, but both candidates envision the Federal Housing Administration providing new, cheaper mortgages to distressed homeowners who otherwise would have difficulty refinancing into more secure government-insured loans with lower monthly payments.

For the plans to work, lenders would have to be willing to take a substantial loss by reducing the amount owed on the loan. But some would have a powerful incentive to do so because a refinancing deal could allow them to recover far more money than they would get from the costly process of foreclosing on the property and trying to resell it.

Obama supports legislation along these lines by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., which would help around 400,000 strapped homeowners. People wouldn’t have to have good credit to qualify as long as they could show they are able to afford the new payments.

“If the government can bail out investment banks on Wall Street, we can extend a hand to folks who are struggling on Main Street,” Obama said.

McCain’s plan would provide relief to 200,000 to 400,000 homeowners but would be open only to people who could show they were creditworthy when they got their original loan.

McCain said his plan offers “every deserving American family or homeowner the opportunity to trade a burdensome mortgage for a manageable loan that reflects the market value of their home.”

The FHA piece of the Dodd plan would cost close to $1 billion, which would come from diverting money in the early years from an affordable housing fund financed by the profits of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. McCain’s FHA provision is estimated to cost from $3 billion to $10 billion and would be paid for by either cutting government spending elsewhere or having the federal government borrow more. The first choice is to cut government spending, a McCain aide said.

Experts predict foreclosures will continue to climb well into 2009. Some believe there’s a chance for improvement in late 2009, but more think that won’t happen until 2010.

Why? A long-term solution is tied to a turnaround in house prices. Slumping home values are blamed for the bulk of the rising tide of foreclosures. Troubled borrowers are left owing more to the bank than their homes are worth, so they walk away from their homes. Dumping more empty houses on the market adds to the pile of unsold homes, and that drives home prices down further. It’s a vicious cycle.

“This is uncharted territory,” said Susan Wachter, a professor of real estate and finance at the University of Pennsylvania‘s Wharton School of Business.

Some predict house prices won’t turn up until the spring selling season of 2010 — at the earliest.

Lawrence Summers, a former Treasury Secretary in the Clinton administration, predicted more than 2 million foreclosures are coming over the next two years, and up to 15 million homeowners will owe more than their house is worth, as house prices continue to fall.

Fifty-seven percent of Americans say housing prices are important to them personally, according to a recent AP-Yahoo News poll. For many, their home is their biggest asset. As home prices dropped, so did Americans’ net worth — leaving people feeling less financially secure and more gloomy about the economy’s direction.

Which candidate would do a better job of handling housing prices? Twenty-five percent said Obama, while 17% thought McCain. Nearly 30% said neither.

Although most voters think the next president will have a “great deal” or “some” influence over housing prices, the reality is there’s no quick fix.

“The odds of that are slim to none,” said Cal Jillson, political science professor at Southern Methodist University. If the next president can make people more optimistic about the future, “the slow rebuilding of confidence will help to increase home values,” he said.

When it comes to handling the broader economy — the top concern of voters, 32% picked Obama, while 28% went with McCain, the poll said.

There’s another complicating factor that could push up foreclosures and that presidents don’t control: Federal Reserve action. If the Fed is forced to boost interest rates to fend off inflation that would hike payments for struggling homeowners whose mortgage rates are resetting. “We are very exposed to interest rate risks and mortgage payment shocks in 2009,” Wachter said.

Mortgage rates, including those on 30-year home loans, already have been climbing — pushed by inflation worries.

In addition to his FHA proposal, Obama calls for creation of a $10 billion foreclosure prevention fund that boosts counseling for distressed homeowners before they slide into foreclosure, helps people sell homes they bought but couldn’t afford and teams with state governments, community groups and lenders to make sure loans can be modified in a timely manner to avoid foreclosure or bankruptcy.

His approach, which reflects the traditional Democratic preference for more government intervention, also would create a 10% mortgage credit for people who don’t itemize their taxes. That would provide 10 million homeowners, most of whom earn under $50,000 a year, with an average of $500 in savings, his campaign says. And, that should help those struggling to keep up with their mortgage payments.

Obama also supports changing bankruptcy laws so that homeowners going through that process can renegotiate terms of their mortgages — just as people or investors who own multiple homes or vacation homes can do.

And, Obama also would move to combat mortgage fraud and improve mortgage disclosure. Deficiencies in those areas contributed to lax lending that allowed people to take out home loans that their incomes couldn’t support, critics say.

“This kind of transparency won’t just make our homeowners more secure, it will make our markets more stable, and keep our economy strong and competitive in the future,” Obama said.

McCain prefers a more limited government role in dealing with the housing crisis, consistent with traditional GOP leanings. The other component of his plan calls for the Justice Department to set up a task force to investigate possible wrongdoing in the mortgage industry. The Justice Department has been pursuing cases of fraud and other mortgage-related matters.

“In some cases, lenders and borrowers alike were caught up in the speculative frenzy that has harmed the housing market,” McCain said. “And it is not the responsibility of the American public to spare them from the consequences of their own bad judgment.”

Congress has been working on a broad housing rescue package that would allow the FHA to help struggling homeowners. Differences have to be worked out between Dodd’s plan, which is pending in the Senate, and a similar House-passed package by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and with the White House, too. The White House has repeatedly threatened a veto but is working behind the scenes with congressional leaders to find common ground.

The rescue plans envisioned by Obama and McCain — and Congress — would deliver short-term help but aren’t a cure-all, housing experts said.

Long-term strategies are needed to prevent a repeat of the foreclosure crisis, experts said, and that must revamp the regulatory structure to improve oversight of players and borrowers in the mortgage finance system. The political debate on such a broad overhaul has already started in Washington and will likely spill over to next president and Congress. Both Obama and McCain have indicated they favor tougher regulation.

 

Pay now — or pay much more later

Sunday, July 6th, 2008

Tony Gioventu
Province

Dear Condo Smarts: We live in a 263- unit, 12-floor concrete building that was constructed in the late 1970s. This was a well designed and well finished building that we were once very proud of.

Over the past 30 years our strata has literally done nothing about maintenance and repairs, other than emergency failures like hot-water boilers, and elevators. Now our deferral has come home to haunt us.

Each owner is faced with an average $19,000 assessment just to maintain and upgrade the exterior, not including the roofing.

Our windows have failed, our decks and balconies are in serious failure and the masonry detailing is in need of serious attention.

To put it bluntly, we figured out that if each strata lot had paid an extra $30 per month over the last 34 years, our buildings would have routinely been repaired, the interest would have paid for inflation costs, and we wouldn’t be doing this at a time when construction costs are at a record high. We are encouraging every strata to look at their long-term plans and plan for the future.

— CC, Vancouver

Dear CC: You are absolutely correct. Unfortunately, our legislation does not yet require strata corporations to plan for the future costs other than minimal reserve contributions.

A serious behaviour pattern that many home owners provincewide have developed is “run to failure.”

It is often too easy to defer maintenance issues because they don’t directly affect our daily lifestyle, but once the roof fails, the windows leak, the elevator seizes, pipes burst, the parkade floods, it’s too late. The costs have accelerated 30 to 50 per cent and your community is faced with costly damages. A solution for strata corporations is to consider bylaws that specifically address repair and maintenance of building components.

There are two considerations. The Operations Manual, which itemizes all components that require annual inspection, maintenance and repairs, and the Renewals Manual, which details all building components, analysis of their current condition, remaining life, schedule for replacement and cost estimates for future repairs.

Once a bylaw is ratified, the strata corporation is bound to the annual and future commitments of repairs and funding.

We’ve all heard the line “Pay me now or pay me later.” In strata corporations it needs to be amended to “Pay me much more later.”

A sample Building Maintenance Enclosure checklist is available by e-mailing Deanna Ferguson at [email protected].

Tony Gioventu is executive director of the Condominium Home Owners Association (CHOA).

E-mail: [email protected]

© The Vancouver Province 2008

 

Pacific Spirit 5928 Birney Ave., Vancouver a 165-unit condo development in two four-storey low-rises

Sunday, July 6th, 2008

Green sensibility includes low-toxicity textiles and Energy Star windows

Kate Webb
Province

The suites at Pacific Spirit will be compact, energy-efficient and classy — high-tech without being cold or too trendy.

The refreshing contrast between the wood panelling and the white high-gloss lacquer of the kitchen cabinets helps combine modernism and warmth in the suites at Pacific Spirit. Photograph by : Wayne Leidenfrost, The Province

The living room in a Pacific Spirit display suite reflects the developer’s decision to to build compact and efficient to maximize affordability.

Master bedrooms and ensuite washrooms will serve as a fitting reward at the end of a long day.

If you love the forest, forget Stanley Park: Pacific Spirit is Vancouver‘s best-kept wooded secret.

Completely surrounding the University of British Columbia on Vancouver‘s western coastline, the regional treasure is a favourite among dog owners, hikers and bikers alike.

So naturally, when prolific developer Adera decided to build a new condo complex next door to the leafy paradise in the up-and-coming Wesbrook neighbourhood at UBC, its masterminds named it after the park.

The low-rise, 165-unit development, of which one building is named Pacific and the other Spirit, is all about embracing the peace and tranquility of its trailside address.

“UBC has always been one of the most sought-after places to live, and the reason is because once you pass over Alma Street, you go through the university endowment lands and it’s like a barrier,” says Eric Andreasen, vice-president of marketing for Adera.

“I call it an ethos. Everyone wants to come out here because this is the capital of smartness.”

There was a time — actually, it’s not over yet — when UBC was seen as a city within a city lacking the conveniences of urban living.

But that’s all changing now with the rapid construction of the new Wesbrook neighbourhood, which will straddle Wesbrook Mall south of West 16th Avenue.

By the time Pacific Spirit is finished and ready for move-ins in February 2010, a new Save On Foods will be open at the centre of the village, along with a bustling business district.

Most buyers at Pacific Spirit will be settled in just in time to enjoy some Olympic hockey at the new Thunderbird Winter Sports Centre on campus, and to catch the latest academic buzz as the world arrives at Vancouver‘s doorstep.

“This is where the urban aspect of UBC is going to come to life,” says Andreasen of the Wesbrook neighbourhood.

“It’s going to be vibrant, it’s going to be unique, and it’s going to be the centre of the new university community.”

With housing prices skyrocketing at UBC in anticipation of the new amenities, Pacific Spirit’s developers decided to build compact and efficient homes to maximize affordability and squeeze the most out of the materials.

The 850-square-foot display suite is high-tech without being cold or overly trendy.

“We’re trying to give the suites some warmth but also some modernism,” says Andreasen, pointing out the refreshing contrast between the wood panelling and the white high-gloss lacquer of the kitchen cabinets.

The standard package comes with granite slab counters, GE Profile appliances, striking imported porcelain tile floors and a fridge smartly located off to the side, allowing room for two cooks in the kitchen.

The environment was a key concern for Adera, says Andreasen. Most of the everyday consumptive features are automated, from motion-sensitive kitchen faucets to the bathroom lights.

In fact, the whole project was built to a gold made-at-UBC sustainability certification standard called the Residential Environmental Assessment Program, created by the university’s Sustainability Office to bring a green sensibility into all of its developments.

REAP covers everything from water- and energy-efficient appliances to Energy Star windows and low-toxicity textiles, and Adera has even thrown in a membership to Vancouver’s locally-owned Co-operative Auto Network car share to sweeten the deal.

With all that good karma helping you sleep easy, the master bedroom and ensuite washroom will certainly serve as a fitting reward at the end of a long day.

Distinctive crown moulding reflects the building’s west coast architecture, and the angled entrance to the large walk-in closet is a stylish design feature.

All the suites come with some kind of outdoor living space, big enough for a barbecue and pre-outfitted with a gas hook-up. First-floor walk-up units have a patio or deck, while upper floors get a balcony or rooftop patio.

Pacific Spirit’s grand opening was yesterday, and for a limited time buyers will get a custom kitchen appliances upgrade package that includes GE’s top-of-the-line Monogram series.

Over 40 per cent of units in the first-phase release have been sold, so better beat a path through the forest if you’re interested..

THE FACTS

What: Pacific Spirit, a 165-unit condo development in two four-storey low-rises.

Where: 5928 Birney Ave., Vancouver.

Developer: Adera

Sizes: One-bedroom-plus-den or two-bedroom-plus-den, from 661 to 1,054 sq. ft.

Prices: $449,900 to $829,900

Open: Presentation centre and display suite open at 5779 Birney Ave. every day from 12 to 5 p.m.

More Info: www.Adera.com

© The Vancouver Province 2008

 

Canadians head south to buy cars

Saturday, July 5th, 2008

Weak U.S. economy and strong currency send buyers stateside

Fiona Anderson
Sun

The slump in the United States economy and the strong Canadian dollar are good news for Canadian car buyers who have been snapping up U.S. vehicles twice as fast as they did a year ago.

By the end of June, 151,169 automobiles had been imported into Canada from the U.S. — more than two times as many as during the first six months of 2007, according to numbers provided by the North American Automobile Trade Association, an Ontario-based association of dealers who buy and sell cars across borders.

While numbers aren’t broken down by province, in the past two years about 20 per cent of imports from the U.S. came to B.C.

The strong Canadian dollar and the faltering U.S. economy are two major reasons for the influx of cars, NAATA’s president and CEO Brian Osler said in an interview.

With the weak U.S. economy, there is less demand for cars, so manufacturers have to charge less to make the sale, Osler said.

Even if the car is actually built in Canada and then shipped to the U.S., it still could have a lower sales price, “because the manufacturer can get a higher price in Canada,” Osler said.

In fact, the latest numbers show that in June, cars sales in the U.S. dropped more than 13 per cent falling to a 15-year low, according to BMO Capital Markets senior economist Sal Guatieri.

But what is also fueling cross-border purchases is Canadian awareness that not only are cars cheaper in the U.S., they’re not that hard to import, Osler said.

While some purchasers may make the trip south themselves, many will buy through a local dealer that specializes in importing cars. And those who do buy themselves can hire companies to do the importing paperwork for them.

Advantage Trading Ltd. in Burnaby helps customers bring their newly-bought cars into the country.

Business this year has been booming, Advantage’s Jennifer Hunter said in an interview.

And the main reason is cost.

“The Canadian consumer is sophisticated,” Hunter said. “With access to the Internet they can do research and they can see that the exact same vehicle in the States with minor differences . . . is considerably cheaper. We’ve had people say [they’ve saved] sometimes $15,000 to $20,000 on high-end vehicles.”

But while Advantage doesn’t help clients find cars, they do recommend people do a few things to make sure they don’t have problems down the road.

First they should buy through an authorized dealer or authorized auction, both of whom would guarantee the car is as advertised.

Buyers should also check the car’s history on Carfax, and ensure the car’s warranty will still be valid. The Automobile Protection Agency’s website apa.ca has a list of cars and whether the warranty will be honoured. Many won’t, according to the website.

“But the best thing to do is call the manufacturer directly,” Hunter said.

Another good website is http://www.riv.ca/english/html/how_to_import.html which lists what has to be done to get a car into Canada, and what cars are importable. Modifications often need to be made to the cars — such as switching on the daytime running lights — to ensure they comply with Transport Canada regulations.

Westport Motor Cars in Vancouver specializes in finding high-end slightly-used cars in the U.S. which the dealer resells in B.C.

But it’s not just a price issue, it’s also an issue of availability, owner Todd Macdonald said.

“The problem is there is only 30 million people in Canada and [these high-end cars] are not readily available,” Macdonald said.

“Where can you find the Bentley and the Porsche that are a year old and have a few thousand miles on them here in Canada?” Macdonald asked. “We just didn’t have the allocation to the dealers here in Canada. Nor, a few years ago, did we have the economy where people were buying stuff like that.”

In the U.S., on the other hand, people were buying high-end cars that, with the downturn in the economy, they may no longer be able to afford.

But not all cars are sufficiently cheaper in the U.S. to make going south worthwhile, Osler said.

“When you import you have to pay to ship the car up, you might have to do these modifications to the car, you certainly have some paperwork at customs and paperwork with Transport Canada,” Osler said. “So there has to be a big enough price difference to make it worthwhile.”

For cars built outside North America there is also an import duty of 6.1 per cent.

“The bottom line is, if you’re looking for a car, it’s worth finding out what the price is in the States . . . because you might end up saving a lot of money,” Osler said.

© The Vancouver Sun 2008