Archive for February, 2009

Justin” Provincial Court Records now on the net

Friday, February 13th, 2009

How to fact-check your significant maybe

Ethan Baron
Province

Go ahead, fall in love. But don’t forget to check for skeletons in the closet.

You don’t want to end up being someone’s bloody Valentine.

Tomorrow marks the first Valentine’s Day on which a new online investigative tool has been available to British Columbians. It’s never been so easy to find out if the person who makes your heart throb should make you run for your life.

Meet “Justin,” your best defence against Cupid’s whims.

B.C.’s court services have put the “Justin” provincial court-records system on the Internet. Go to Court Services Online.

Leave the court location blank, so the search covers all B.C., plug in a name, and up comes the criminal history. You can find out if your significant maybe has been charged with a crime, when and where they appeared in court, and what the result was if there has been one.

First-degree murder, sexual assault, uttering threats, criminal harassment, theft, drug-dealing — you can get it all. Justin even shows speeding tickets.

Now, this search works best if your love interest has an unusual name. Search for Mike Smith or Jennifer Jones and you’re going to get a lot of different people. It helps if you know the person’s middle name. You can narrow it down if you know their age — go to the “participants” tab and you’ll get a year of birth for the accused.

If you’re still not sure, you can visit the registry of the court that handled the case, and ask for whatever files are publicly available.

Justin is an excellent new tool to protect yourself from heartbreak, or worse. But, with so many liars, cheats, thieves, con artists, perverts, sociopaths, psychopaths, drug addicts, drunks, deadbeats, derelicts and even gangsters among us, you need additional Cupid-control.

Facebook can be a treasure-trove of personal information, especially if someone doesn’t limit access to their profile, or if you and the other person have become Facebook friends.

Vancouver public-relations consultant Nicole Hall, 24, met a man from Regina while on vacation in the Dominican Republic. Travis assured her he was single. Although Hall typically checks Facebook before dating someone, she was on vacation and let her personal rules slide. But before she flew home, she agreed to Travis’s suggestion that she add him on Facebook. Back home, she checked his profile, which showed he was “in a relationship.”

“He basically flat-out lied about his relationship status,” Hall says. “He’s kind of a sleazebag and not really someone that I would ever really want to associate myself with again.”

Even without access to someone’s profile, you can usually see who their friends are, unless they’re one of the few Facebook users who restrict that from public view. Are his friends smoking joints and throwing gang signs? Are her friends flaunting prison tattoos and drinking straight from the whiskey bottle? You may want to cancel that coffee date.

This Valentine’s Day, listen to your heart. Then go online, and get a second opinion.

© Copyright (c) The Province

Criminal checks on line

Friday, February 13th, 2009

How to fact-check your significant maybe

Ethan Baron
Province

Go ahead, fall in love. But don’t forget to check for skeletons in the closet.

You don’t want to end up being someone’s bloody Valentine.

Tomorrow marks the first Valentine’s Day on which a new online investigative tool has been available to British Columbians. It’s never been so easy to find out if the person who makes your heart throb should make you run for your life.

Meet “Justin,” your best defence against Cupid’s whims.

B.C.’s court services have put the “Justin” provincial court-records system on the Internet. Go to Court Services Online.

Leave the court location blank, so the search covers all B.C., plug in a name, and up comes the criminal history. You can find out if your significant maybe has been charged with a crime, when and where they appeared in court, and what the result was if there has been one.

First-degree murder, sexual assault, uttering threats, criminal harassment, theft, drug-dealing — you can get it all. Justin even shows speeding tickets.

Now, this search works best if your love interest has an unusual name. Search for Mike Smith or Jennifer Jones and you’re going to get a lot of different people. It helps if you know the person’s middle name. You can narrow it down if you know their age — go to the “participants” tab and you’ll get a year of birth for the accused.

If you’re still not sure, you can visit the registry of the court that handled the case, and ask for whatever files are publicly available.

Justin is an excellent new tool to protect yourself from heartbreak, or worse. But, with so many liars, cheats, thieves, con artists, perverts, sociopaths, psychopaths, drug addicts, drunks, deadbeats, derelicts and even gangsters among us, you need additional Cupid-control.

Facebook can be a treasure-trove of personal information, especially if someone doesn’t limit access to their profile, or if you and the other person have become Facebook friends.

Vancouver public-relations consultant Nicole Hall, 24, met a man from Regina while on vacation in the Dominican Republic. Travis assured her he was single. Although Hall typically checks Facebook before dating someone, she was on vacation and let her personal rules slide. But before she flew home, she agreed to Travis’s suggestion that she add him on Facebook. Back home, she checked his profile, which showed he was “in a relationship.”

“He basically flat-out lied about his relationship status,” Hall says. “He’s kind of a sleazebag and not really someone that I would ever really want to associate myself with again.”

Even without access to someone’s profile, you can usually see who their friends are, unless they’re one of the few Facebook users who restrict that from public view. Are his friends smoking joints and throwing gang signs? Are her friends flaunting prison tattoos and drinking straight from the whiskey bottle? You may want to cancel that coffee date.

This Valentine’s Day, listen to your heart. Then go online, and get a second opinion.

© Copyright (c) The Province

Justin” Provincial Court Records now on the net

Friday, February 13th, 2009

How to fact-check your significant maybe

Ethan Baron
Province

Nicole Hall let her guard down while vacationing in the Dominican Republic. Back home, she checked Facebook and discovered her new boyfriend was ‘kind of a sleazebag.’ Photograph by: Ric Ernst, The Province

Go ahead, fall in love. But don’t forget to check for skeletons in the closet.

You don’t want to end up being someone’s bloody Valentine.

Tomorrow marks the first Valentine’s Day on which a new online investigative tool has been available to British Columbians. It’s never been so easy to find out if the person who makes your heart throb should make you run for your life.

Meet “Justin,” your best defence against Cupid’s whims.

B.C.’s court services have put the “Justin” provincial court-records system on the Internet. Go to Court Services Online.

Leave the court location blank, so the search covers all B.C., plug in a name, and up comes the criminal history. You can find out if your significant maybe has been charged with a crime, when and where they appeared in court, and what the result was if there has been one.

First-degree murder, sexual assault, uttering threats, criminal harassment, theft, drug-dealing — you can get it all. Justin even shows speeding tickets.

Now, this search works best if your love interest has an unusual name. Search for Mike Smith or Jennifer Jones and you’re going to get a lot of different people. It helps if you know the person’s middle name. You can narrow it down if you know their age — go to the “participants” tab and you’ll get a year of birth for the accused.

If you’re still not sure, you can visit the registry of the court that handled the case, and ask for whatever files are publicly available.

Justin is an excellent new tool to protect yourself from heartbreak, or worse. But, with so many liars, cheats, thieves, con artists, perverts, sociopaths, psychopaths, drug addicts, drunks, deadbeats, derelicts and even gangsters among us, you need additional Cupid-control.

Facebook can be a treasure-trove of personal information, especially if someone doesn’t limit access to their profile, or if you and the other person have become Facebook friends.

Vancouver public-relations consultant Nicole Hall, 24, met a man from Regina while on vacation in the Dominican Republic. Travis assured her he was single. Although Hall typically checks Facebook before dating someone, she was on vacation and let her personal rules slide. But before she flew home, she agreed to Travis’s suggestion that she add him on Facebook. Back home, she checked his profile, which showed he was “in a relationship.”

“He basically flat-out lied about his relationship status,” Hall says. “He’s kind of a sleazebag and not really someone that I would ever really want to associate myself with again.”

Even without access to someone’s profile, you can usually see who their friends are, unless they’re one of the few Facebook users who restrict that from public view. Are his friends smoking joints and throwing gang signs? Are her friends flaunting prison tattoos and drinking straight from the whiskey bottle? You may want to cancel that coffee date.

This Valentine’s Day, listen to your heart. Then go online, and get a second opinion.

© Copyright (c) The Province

More people thinking about buying real estate

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

But majority say it’s not a good time to sell property

Derrick Penner
Sun

A growing number of British Columbians think this is a good time to buy a home, though most say it isn’t a good time to sell, a new Ipsos Reid poll has found.

The poll found that some 71 per cent of respondents said it is a somewhat good or very good time to buy real estate.

In November, only 60 per cent of respondents told Ipsos Reid it was a good time to buy.

In the latest poll, 82 per cent said now is not a good time to sell a home.

Hanson Lok, senior research manager at Ipsos Reid in Vancouver, said as market conditions improve for buyers, there also seems to be a growing number of British Columbians gathering on the sidelines to contemplate buying new homes.

Three in 10 respondents said they were considering a purchase in the next two years, up from 20 per cent when the same question was asked in November.

“We are seeing a greater number of first-time home buyers in particular looking to take advantage of more affordable homes, incentives from the government and lower costs of borrowing,” Lok said in a news release.

The new poll also found that British Columbians’ expectations for falling prices have been muted since November.

While the B.C. Real Estate Association has forecast price declines of 13 per cent in 2009 and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. is predicting drops of around 10 per cent in Metro Vancouver, only 42 per cent of respondents to the recent Ipsos Reid poll said they expected prices to be lower 12 months from now.

That is down from November, when 57 per cent said prices would be lower a year later.

Across the Lower Mainland, including Metro Vancouver and the Fraser Valley, respondents’ expectations were for a further 2.3-per-cent decline in prices.

Across the rest of B.C., respondents believe prices will drop another four per cent.

Statistics Canada reported new-home price data for December showing that in Metro Vancouver, prices had fallen 2.3 per cent from the same month a year ago.

Vancouver‘s price decline was the fourth steepest among cities on the downside of their cycles following Victoria, Calgary and Edmonton, which saw the steepest year-over-year drop of 8.2 per cent.

Victoria‘s decline in December was about three per cent from the same month a year ago.

Nationally, the housing price index declined by one-tenth of a percentage point from November to December, which weighed on gains made in the measure over the year.

The national HPI for December was up 0.4 per cent compared with the same month a year ago.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

 

No one home: 1 in 9 housing units vacant

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Haya El Nasser and Paul Overberg
USA Today

Two houses with discontinued construction surround an empty lot, next to a finished home, in Miami on Jan. 22.

A record 1 in 9 U.S. homes are vacant, a glut created by the housing boom and subsequent collapse.

“The numbers are further documentation of the gravity of the housing problem,” says Nicolas Retsinas, head of Harvard University‘s Joint Center for Housing Studies. “This inventory is delaying any kind of housing recovery.”

The surge in empty houses, condominiums and apartments is creating a wave of problems for communities desperate to shore up property values and tax revenues that pay for services. Vacant homes create upkeep and safety problems that ripple through neighborhoods.

“It has a contagion effect,” Retsinas says. “A house that is vacant is often a house that is less well kept up.”

A construction frenzy began pushing the vacancy rate up in 2005 but empty homes sold quickly at that time.

“This is a different problem,” says Dowell Myers, housing demographer at the University of Southern California. “It’s high now because of lack of demand. Now, vacancies we see are from units that have been empty for a period of time.”

Census numbers show:

• More than 14 million housing units are vacant. That number does not include an estimated 4.8 million seasonal or vacation homes, most of which are occupied part of the year. The combined vacancy rate of almost 15% is higher than during previous recessions: 11% in 1991 and 9.4% in 1984.

• About 3% of owned homes are vacant. In normal times, “maybe 1% should be vacant,” Myers says.

• More than 9% of homes built since 2000 are vacant compared with about 2% for older homes.

• Homes priced at $500,000 or more are just as likely to be empty as homes that cost less than $100,000.

Historically, vacant housing was more of a concern in cities that have poor neighborhoods. Now, it has hit suburbs and new subdivisions.

“You have abandoned vacant housing in Detroit but you also have it in Henderson, Nev., and Mesa, Ariz. (suburbs of Las Vegas and Phoenix),” Retsinas says.

The stimulus bill before Congress contains $2 billion to help communities buy and fix foreclosed, vacant properties.

One place hit hard is Rialto, Calif., an inland town that boomed by offering shelter from astronomical housing prices in coastal Southern California. Property values have dropped 50% since 2007. In a 40-unit development, only four are occupied, says John Dutrey, housing program manager. Vacant homes, he says, bring “squatters, you have maintenance issues, security issues.”

 

West End Apt. Buildings Price Per Door has fallen $50K from $239K in 2007 to $183K in Oct 2008

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Other

Download Document

West End Apt. Buildings Price Per Door has fallen $50K from $239K in 2007 to $183K in Oct 2008

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Other

Download Document

Twitter & Facebook are the new social media venues to market Real Estate

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Other

Download Document

Twitter & Facebook are the new social media venues to market Real Estate

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Other

Download Document

Good news: Foreclosures down 10%; state-by-state chart

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Stephanie Armour
USA Today

Foreclosures dropped in January, a possible sign that efforts to slow foreclosures through moratoriums and mortgage modifications are having some effect.

Foreclosure filings — default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions — were reported on 274,399 properties during January, a 10% decrease from December but still up 18% from January 2008, according to RealtyTrac. The report also shows one in every 466 U.S. homes received a foreclosure filing in January.

The last time foreclosures dropped was in November.

“Everybody is slowing the process down with moratoriums and workouts. There’s more caution,” says Joel Naroff, with Naroff Economic Advisors. “But it doesn’t change the reality. There will still be a lot more foreclosures to come.”

On Wednesday, the federal Office of Thrift Supervision urged the more than 800 savings and loan associations it regulates to suspend foreclosures until the home loan modification program outlined in Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s financial recovery plan is finalized. Geithner has said the Obama administration will earmark $50 billion to prevent avoidable foreclosures by reducing monthly payments for homeowners.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac extended their moratoriums on foreclosures through the end of January, and some states have taken similar steps. In December, Florida put in place a voluntary 45-day freeze on all new foreclosure actions and scheduling of foreclosure sales. The result: Overall foreclosure activity in Florida was down 20% in January from the previous month, according to RealtyTrac.

But the moratoriums raise concerns that foreclosures are only being delayed, not prevented.

“We are coming off an abnormally high month in December, so from a peak like that, having some drop is normal. Plus Fannie and Freddie extended their moratorium,” says Rick Sharga, with RealtyTrac. “A 90-day moratorium looks good on paper, but if you don’t manage it better, it doesn’t cure the problem.”

States with the top foreclosure rates were Nevada, California and Arizona. Nevada foreclosure activity in January decreased 4% from December, but the state still had the nation’s No. 1 foreclosure rate. One in every 76 homes was in some stage of foreclosure during the month.

Still, few economists say the runaway pace of foreclosures is a thing of the past. Another 3 million foreclosures are expected in 2009, according to RealtyTrac. An analysis by Moody’s Economy.com forecast 3.1 million defaults in 2009 and 13.5 million defaults from 2006 to 2011.

In addition to the recent drop in foreclosures, there have been other promising signs in the bruising housing market.

Existing home sales showed an unexpected uptick in December. Sales rose 6.5% in December to an annual rate of 4.74 million properties from 4.45 million in November, a report Monday by the National Association of Realtors said. Economists had been predicting a drop of around 4%.

“We are beginning to see some bargain hunters coming into the market looking,” says Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors.

“A 10% decline (in foreclosures) is positive, but it’s after very high levels. We still have a crisis. (The moratoriums) could just be postponing.”

Rate rank

 

Total filings

1 per X housing units

Change Dec-Jan

Change from Jan. 08

 

U.S.

274,399

466

-9.56%

17.77%

39

Alabama

920

       2,323

24.83%

58.35%

32

Alaska

167

       1,690

-41.81%

46.49%

3

Arizona

14,674

          182

-8.07%

61.98%

22

Arkansas

1,516

          849

-16.43%

29.35%

2

California

76,761

          173

-14.18%

34.30%

11

Colorado

4,323

          492

-18.73%

-36.73%

23

Connecticut

1,651

          871

-19.85%

-55.34%

36

Delaware

174

       2,233

-58.77%

0.58%

 

D.C.

207

       1,373

-31.46%

-58.93%

4

Florida

40,770

          214

-19.76%

35.10%

8

Georgia

9,907

          400

-1.24%

-7.11%

30

Hawaii

337

       1,504

-32.46%

173.98%

9

Idaho

1,512

          417

-5.38%

105.71%

6

Illinois

14,447

          363

16.32%

85.05%

14

Indiana

4,556

          610

-4.51%

-17.94%

35

Iowa

677

       1,964

-23.68%

31.71%

34

Kansas

665

       1,834

4.23%

92.75%

40

Kentucky

671

       2,841

-23.92%

17.31%

42

Louisiana

485

       3,833

-26.18%

-32.64%

37

Maine

308

       2,262

13.65%

48.79*

16

Maryland

3,697

          627

-16.72%

0.43%

20

Massachusetts

3,362

          810

-14.21%

-57.80%

7

Michigan

11,418

          397

-15.75%

6.25%

28

Minnesota

1,886

       1,222

-21.65%

21.68%

43

Mississippi

275

       4,563

108.33*

69.75*

27

Missouri

2,469

       1,072

-24.61†

-26.50†

46

Montana

49

       8,888

28.95%

-45.56%

49

Nebraska

31

     25,187

-32.61%

-87.84%

1

Nevada

14,444

            76

-3.96%

137.29%

19

New Hampshire

750

          792

-14.29%

-9.64%

17

New Jersey

5,005

          699

29.50%

-2.11%

44

New Mexico

164

       5,257

-55.19%

-57.18%

38

New York

3,496

       2,271

23.71%

-28.08%

33

North Carolina

2,386

       1,729

-7.30%

-29.26%

45

North Dakota

52

       5,972

18.18%

126.09%

10

Ohio

11,199

          452

-0.54%

-12.41%

31

Oklahoma

973

       1,668

-23.39%

-21.02%

5

Oregon

4,511

          357

45.14%

218.80*

29

Pennsylvania

3,682

       1,488

-10.61%

118.78%

13

Rhode Island

745

          605

-12.46%

-4.73%

21

South Carolina

2,463

          821

35.85%

462.33*

47

South Dakota

39

       9,160

-13.33%

77.27%

18

Tennessee

3,662

          744

-5.72%

-13.61%

26

Texas

9,754

          967

2.73%

-33.64%

12

Utah

1,791

          517

-4.63%

85.02%

50

Vermont

6

     51,906

-62.50%

500.00*

15

Virginia

5,366

          610

-25.94†

4.15†

24

Washington

3,140

          874

13.40%

42.73%

48

West Virginia

74

     11,928

27.59%

39.62%

25

Wisconsin

2,699

          949

16.99%

28.40%

41

Wyoming

83

       2,920

3.75%

93.02%

Source: RealtyTrac