Archive for August, 2017

$28m Price Tag for Surrey Villa is Nearly 10x Assessed Value

Tuesday, August 22nd, 2017

Andrea Nazarian
REW

A BC couple is asking for $28 million for their Tuscan villa-style home in the Fraser Valley, a mere two years after its completion. The 14,225-square-foot custom-built mansion sits on 76 acres of Surrey agricultural reserve land, and is priced $25 million above its current assessed value of $2.9 million. 

Apart from the home’s opulent interior built with world-class imported materials, the property features a 15-acre vineyard, helipad, parking for 40 cars, an outdoor amphitheatre, two lakes, a koi fish pond, a spa accessed via elevator, a number of pools and fountains as well as an outdoor dining patio with pizza oven. The property won the 2016 Georgie Award, which celebrtates home-building excellence in British Columbia, for outdoor living and landscaping. 

The most eye-popping aspect of this home, however, is arguably not its luxury amenities but rather its price tag given its location in the Fraser Valley. According a report by the Vancouver Sun, B.C. home Assessment Documents reveal that residential-zoned land on the property is valued at $986,000, farmland valued at $76,000 and buildings on the property valued at $1.84 million.

Believe it or not, the villa isn’t the only Surrey home listed at $28 million, either. 

Michael Gleboff, spokesman for the Fraser Valley Real Estate Board, said to the Sun that only a “handful” of single-family homes in the Fraser Valley have sold over $10 million. He explained that some waterfront properties in Surrey’s White Rock neighbourhood have sold between $8 and $13 million in recent years, but that a property priced over $20 million in the Fraser Valley would typically be for a multi-family development. 

The couple, who spent several years building the home, are now considering retirement and “down sizing” after living on the property for a short time. 

© 2017 REW.ca

Apple suppliers finally cashing in

Monday, August 21st, 2017

Technologies that took years to develop part of newest iPhone

ALEX WEBB
The Vancouver Sun

It was the late 1990s, and entrepreneurs Steven Abramson and Sidney Rosenblatt were pitching an electronics giant on their new flat-screen technology. It didn’t go well.

The product was unproven, and, given that the startup had a pittance in the bank, the manufacturer had doubts about its long-term viability. “You want us to bet the future of our company on your technology?,” the would-be customer said after the presentation. “Steve and I looked at each other and said, ‘He has a point’,” Rosenblatt said in a recent interview. He didn’t identify the manufacturer he was pitching.

Almost 20 years and half a billion dollars in research and development later, the pitch finally paid off. Apple will soon release a new iPhone using the organic lightemitting diode, or OLED, technology that Abramson and Rosenblatt toiled on for so long. The company they run, Universal Display Corp., is valued at US$5.4 billion, almost double a year ago — a rally fuelled by winning the world’s most valuable company as an end customer.

As Apple fights to maintain its technology leadership in smartphones, it’s turning to little-known suppliers that have spent years or even decades developing components in the hope they might one day enjoy widespread adoption. Like Universal Display, other companies including Lumentum Holdings Inc. and AMS AG are also poised to benefit from the next version of Apple’s bestselling device.

The iPhone 8, as analysts tentatively dub it, is the most significant upgrade to Apple’s handset lineup since at least 2014. Smartphones have evolved from communication devices into portable hubs for identity, payments, entertainment and new experiences like augmented reality. That requires major hardware upgrades, forcing Apple to scour the global electronics supply chain for tools and services that often had narrower uses until now.

In addition to the OLED display, the new iPhone will have a frontfacing 3-D sensor that uses facial recognition to unlock the screen, people familiar with the plans have told Bloomberg News. That will provide a boost to a tech niche whose greatest success to date is Microsoft Corp.’s Kinect motionsensing system in the Xbox gaming console. The iPhone market dwarfs that.

Lumentum makes lasers used in 3-D sensors and controls about three-quarters of that market, according to Alex Henderson, a Needham & Co. analyst. The Milpitas, California-based supplier expects to deliver US$200 million worth of lasers this year, most of which will end up in iPhones. Prior to July, Lumentum’s total cumulative revenue from that market was around US$5 million, according to Henderson.

“Lumentum has been working on this stuff for at least a decade,” Henderson said. He expects the 3-D laser market to be worth as much as US$2 billion by 2020. Lumentum shares are up 65 per cent over the past year. A Lumentum spokesman declined to comment.

Viavi Solutions Inc., what was left when JDS Uniphase spun off Lumentum into a separate business, will provide 3-D laser filters for the iPhone, according to a person familiar with the contract. These components were primarily used in laser-guided missile systems, but when smartphone-makers considered them for face-recognition systems, Viavi designed a smaller version. It expects US$35 million to US$45 million in 3-D sensor-related revenue in fiscal 2018. Viavi stock is up 38 per cent in the past year.

Other sensor companies stand to benefit too. Austria-based AMS recognized the potential of optical sensors in 2011 when it acquired Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions Inc. That deal gave it components that adapt iPhone screen brightness to ambient light conditions and detect whether the handset is being held against the ear, deactivating the touchscreen.

Apple’s 2013 purchase of Israel’s PrimeSense Ltd. showed it was serious about 3-D sensor technology. AMS responded by accelerating its push into the space. It spent more than US$600 million to acquire Heptagon Micro Optics Pte. and Princeton Optronics Inc., adding sensors that receive signals from the lasers Lumentum and rivals churn out.

AMS already gets about 20 per cent of its revenue from Apple, according to Bloomberg supply chain analysis. Analysts expect further orders from the Cupertino, California-based company to help sales to almost double to more than 1 billion euros (US$1.2 billion) this year.

“They now have the whole package,” said Guenther Hollfelder, a Baader Bank analyst. “Even in the short term, the 3-D sensors business will rise significantly because of the relationship with Apple.”

Before the sensor acquisition spree began in 2011, AMS stock had languished around 10 Swiss francs (US$10.26) for years, with products focusing on industrial and automotive applications. It’s now at 70 francs.

Investment in new manufacturing facilities to meet Apple demand means some suppliers are spending while revenue hasn’t climbed much yet. That poses a risk, should Apple decide in a year or two to ditch the new technologies, opt for alternative suppliers or use in-house systems. Chip designer Imagination Technologies Group Plc learned that lesson the hard way earlier this year, when it revealed it was losing Apple’s business.

One innovation that’s unlikely to have its day just yet is wireless charging. The next iPhone is instead likely to include inductive charging similar to the Apple Watch, where the charging unit rests against the device rather than juicing it up through the air.

In 2016, San Jose, Californiabased Energous Corp. said it was developing wireless charging with a “key strategic partner” that analysts and investors understood to mean Apple. The stock doubled that year, but it has fallen in 2017 partly due to delays in getting Federal Communications Commission approval for the equipment, said Ilya Grozovsky, a National Securities Corp. analyst.

Apple typically designs and tests features for new iPhones about a year before the devices are sold. That makes it unlikely wireless charging will feature in the next iPhone because the technology wasn’t ready 12 months ago, Grozovsky said. “It’s more likely to be in a year or two.” The FCC approved an Energous system that transmits energy over short distances in May and it is still seeking approval for longer ranges.

Still, Universal Display’s experience shows patience can sometimes be rewarded. The company says it now gets “a couple of pennies” in revenue for every square inch of OLED sold by its customers.

The OLED specialist has two branches to its business. Since it was founded in 1994, the R&D arm has worked on OLED technology with more vivid colours and lower energy consumption. It then licenses the intellectual property from its thousands of patents to display makers such as Samsung Display Co. Ltd., which manufactures OLED panels and whose sister company Samsung Electronics Co. already uses the displays in its smartphones.

“Initially, we had materials that lit up for 10 seconds and died,” Rosenblatt said. Now, they last for about 20 years, with little degradation in the screen’s brightness, he added. The company’s second arm sells the phosphorescent materials, manufactured in a partnership with PPG Industries Inc., used to make OLED panels.

When Universal Display went public in 1996, Rosenblatt, Abramson and founder Sherwin Seligsohn expected the technology to be widely adopted within five years.

“We realized in 1999, when we’d hired five, six or seven technical folks, that it was going to take a lot longer,” said Rosenblatt. “We didn’t make a lot of money, didn’t get paid for a lot of it. But we were out there plugging away that OLED was going to be the technology of the future and we never changed our focus.”

In February, the company announced its first dividend after finally generating enough profit to cover the US$500 million in R&D costs accrued over 20 years.

© 2017 Postmedia Network Inc.

Amazon?s hiring spree makes waves in tech sector

Monday, August 21st, 2017

300 job openings hailed as ?a great signal? to the world about business in Vancouver

Derrick Penner
The Vancouver Sun

Online retail and technology giant Amazon has been coy about its ambitions for growth in Vancouver, but the careers section of its Canadian website tells part of the story — more than 300 employment postings for skilled tech-sector jobs in the city.

It hints at a significant expansion of one of Vancouver’s bigger tech players, at the same time the city’s startup sector is gaining momentum and trying to draw the same types of skilled workers.

However, key voices in the sector view the signs of Amazon’s expansion as a welcome sight for the city’s overall industry, even if it increases competition for them.

“The reality is I would rather have Amazon setting up shop here than somewhere else,” said Shafim Diamond Tejani, president of startup incubator Victory Square Labs.

“Them being here and expanding their presence creates really good (well-paying) opportunities in the innovation ecosystem.”

The Seattle-headquartered corporate giant established its main Vancouver tech beach-head on several floors of the Telus Garden on Georgia Street in downtown Vancouver when the building opened in 2015.

Amazon did not respond to Postmedia’s request for an interview, but the positions the company is advertising for now, most of which have been listed since the start of this year, carry titles such as software development engineer, research scientist, data engineer and manager of database administration.

The roles explained in job descriptions relate to the development of Amazon Web Services’ cloud-computing business, operations of its fulfilment-centre warehouses and developing systems for its recruiting infrastructure.

A few of the salaries for jobs with those titles listed on the recruiting website Glassdoor range from $89,171 per year for software-development engineer I, $111,465 per year for a software engineer II to $155,553 for a senior product manager.

“This is the influx of a remarkable job engine and a remarkable business,” said Michael Dingle, an advisory partner with the consulting firm PwC.

Dingle, a former tech entrepreneur and PwC’s practice leader in technology financing, said Amazon’s interest probably comes from a couple of directions.

Canada is attractive to the behemoth as a marketplace, to start with, both for customers ordering books and clothes on Amazon Prime and businesses using its cloud-computing products through Amazon Web Services.

Amazon’s growth trajectory is no surprise to Vancouver Economic Commission CEO Ian McKay.

“Growth is the name of the game,” Dingle said, but growth that depends on CEO Jeff Bezos’ drive for constant innovation.

Amazon’s profit picture has appeared erratic over the past year. It posted a profit of US$197 million for its financial quarter ending June 30, compared with US$857 million for the same quarter a year ago.

The company’s revenue, however, continues an upward climb, hitting $38 billion for the first quarter, up 25 per cent from the same period a year ago.

Canada’s major cities, Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver, also have growing reputations as places to build technology companies, Dingle said, which is something else that draws big players like Microsoft and Amazon.

Vancouver’s geography and being on the same time zone as bigger technology hubs in Seattle and Silicon Valley outside of San Francisco also helps attract technology firms, said Ian McKay, CEO of the Vancouver Economic Commission.

And perched on the edge of the Asia-Pacific Gateway, with governments that have been willing to facilitate the migration of skilled individuals from abroad is another factor in the city’s favour, McKay said.

As for Amazon, McKay said outside estimates (the company doesn’t publicize numbers) have the firm at about 1,000 employees locally.

“The notion of 300 job openings (at Amazon) doesn’t surprise me,” McKay said. “This is a great signal to the rest of the world that this is a place people need to be.”

“And people don’t always stay with their original employers. Sometimes they reach a level then spin off and create startups. That’s nothing but good for a (technology sector) like ours.”

Tejani added that labour also tends to be cheaper in Vancouver than places such as Seattle and Silicon Valley, which can be a help to companies that can “build here in Canadian dollars, live in Canada, but still be able to generate (sales in U.S. dollars).”

Tejani acknowledged that the issue of high housing costs has emerged as a recruiting concern for some employers, but he looks at it as another challenge to overcome.

And Vancouver is still a cheaper place to live than other hubs such as Silicon Valley.

“I think we have all the check marks, other than affordable housing, of a great place to build a tech company,” Tejani said.

Vancouver’s tech sector still “punches above its weight, in every respect,” Dingle said, and Amazon’s hiring spree helps give it more critical mass.

“I can’t help but think of the concept of a rising tide lifts all boats,” Dingle said.

© 2017 Postmedia Network Inc.

Tighter lending restrictions could hit first-timers hardest

Monday, August 21st, 2017

Steve Randall
REP

The proposals to tighten mortgage insurance underwriting practices could damage affordability especially for first time buyers according to the real estate association in British Columbia.

OSFI began a consultation period for changes to its Guideline B-20 in July with three key proposals:

  • Requiring a qualifying stress test for all uninsured mortgages;
  • Requiring that Loan-to-Value (LTV) measurements remain dynamic and adjust for local market conditions where they are used as a risk control, such as for qualifying borrowers;
  • Expressly prohibiting co-lending arrangements that are designed, or appear to be designed to circumvent regulatory requirements.

The period for submissions closed last week.

The British Columbia Real Estate Association says that the housing market is still adapting to recent changes including the tightening of mortgage lending regulations last fall and the recent interest rate rise.

“Requiring all uninsured mortgages to have to qualify for a higher mortgage rate than can be negotiated between borrowers and lenders may put homeownership out of reach in some markets,” the association wrote on its blog.

The association says that more changes could imbalance local markets and is calling on the federal government not to make fundamental changes to the national housing finance system at a time of rising interest rates.

Copyright © 2017 Key Media Pty Ltd

CastleRock on Lake Windermere 4254 Castlestone Boulevard Invermere a master planned community on 306 acres by CastleRock Estates Development Corp

Saturday, August 19th, 2017

Year-round recreation on offer at CastleRock

Michael Bernard
The Vancouver Sun

CastleRock on Lake Windermere

Project Address: 4254 Castlestone Blvd., Invermere

Project Scope:  A master-planned community of fully serviced lots and homes on 306 acres overlooking Lake Windermere in the Columbia Valley in B.C.’s East Kootenay

Prices: Prices for lots, averaging one-quarter acre, from $79,000. Lot and home built by CastleRock starting from $550,000

Developer: CastleRock Estates Development Corp.

Sales Centre:  4254 Castlestone Blvd., Invermere

Centre hours: 11 a.m. — 5 p.m., daily

Sales phone: 250-342-3313

Website: Castlerockliving.ca

To the average Vancouverite, the town of Invermere may conjure scenes of waist-deep powder skiing on nearby Panorama Mountain, but many Albertans have long known that the Columbia Valley community offers much more than a winter paradise.

For decades, Albertans — especially people from Calgary just a three-hour drive away — have made Invermere their year-round playground. They’re well aware that the little town of 3,300 nestled between the Purcell and Rocky Mountain ranges, is on “the warm side” of the Rockies. Temperatures average around minus 10 degrees in January,  balmy by Calgary standards, to about 15 degrees in July and August.

Locals boast that one can go skiing on a spring morning, come down the mountain and change to go golfing on the links or boating on the warm waters of the relatively shallow (4.5 metre average depth) Lake Windermere in the afternoon.

Another short drive away and you can finish your day by slipping into the soothing heated waters at nearby Radium or Fairmont Hot Springs.

Now the developers of CastleRock on Lake Windermere say they are beginning to see some interest from Metro Vancouverites impressed by prices that run a fraction of what they face on the West Coast.

“We are starting to see more people from the Vancouver area come through looking,” says Mark Himmelspach, the CEO of the company developing the master-planned community located just five minutes from the centre of town.

“As Kelowna prices rise, there has been more interest in this area, particularly from retirees. And compared to prices in Vancouver, prices here are very, very low.”

CastleRock holds more than 3,600 acres, but is currently developing 306 acres with an authorized build-out of about 1,000 homes, said Himmelspach. About 25 per cent of the 306 acres is dedicated to green space. Fully serviced lot prices start at $79,000 for a .17-acre lot up to about $299,000 for a .25 acre with views of Lake Windmere. Building costs run a little higher than city prices, said Himmelspach, running between $250 and $325 a square foot, depending on the quality of finishing.

CastleRock has built a number of spec homes to showcase its product; over 200 homes and lots have been sold. Its show home is located at 2631 Taynton Trail. It also works with company Goldie Creek to offer custom homebuilding services. Buyers can also bring in their own contractor to build their home.

CastleRock has architectural guidelines in place, favouring a “Mountain Alpine” design with ample use of timber and rock. The developer has also worked on creating trails through the development and has joined a group of other builders in proposing a 15-kilometre biking trail linking Invermere with Radium to the north.

The town of Invermere boasts 63 stores, including five grocery stores and a Hudson’s Bay outlet. While its airport handles only smaller planes, the town is about 90 minutes drive from the Canadian Rockies International Airport in Cranbrook, which is served by Air Canada and Pacific Coastal Airlines and about three hours to Calgary International Airport. Drive time via Highway 1 from Vancouver runs about 8.5 hours.

Besides skiing and golf, the Columbia Valley also offers hiking and mountain biking, gliding, climbing and camping among other recreation. During the winter, Invermere boasts it has the longest continuous skating rink in the world, a 30-kilometre regularly plowed skating path encircling Lake Windermere. Beside it is a similar path dedicated to cross-country skiing.

The diversity of recreation is what drew Scott and Flo Redelback of Calgary and their two teenaged daughters to purchase a vacation home in CastleRock a few years ago.

“It was in the heart of a natural setting but close to the town,” said Scott, explaining where they built their current 1,400-square-foot bungalow. The family did consider the Okanagan, about seven hours by car from Calgary, but realized that it would be a stretch time wise.

“Because we are pretty busy right now with the kids with their sports and dance we needed something that was close in proximity to Calgary,” said the telecommunications executive. “The fact that we can come out on a Friday mid-afternoon and be out here for dinner and have a barbecue was ideal.”

Canmore was much closer to their Calgary home, they said, but a similar house there they figured would run twice the cost of one at CastleRock. Thanks to the current slump in the Calgary oil industry, they were able to get a good deal on a second lot on which they plan to build a permanent retirement home in three to five years. Their next home will probably have five bedrooms, allowing for their daughters and grandchildren to join them for vacations.

© 2017 Postmedia Network Inc.

Foster Martin 334 homes in three towers at 1484 Martin Street White Rock by Landmark Premiere Properties

Saturday, August 19th, 2017

Foster Martin development poised to bring new energy to community?s town centre

Simon Brault
The Vancouver Sun

Foster Martin

Project location: 1484 Martin Street

Project size: 334 homes in three towers, one to four bedrooms ranging from 806 to 3,748 square feet. Prices range from the mid-$500,000s up to more than $6 million

Developer: Landmark Premiere Properties Ltd.

Architect: IBI Group

Interior designer: Studio Finlay

Sales centre: #105 — 1688 152nd Street

Sales phone: 604-531-7111

Hours: noon — 5 p.m. daily

Website: http://www.fostermartin.ca

For many decades, White Rock has been famous for its waterfront: its wooden pier and promenade, the 500-ton white boulder that sits on miles of sandy beach and the shops, cafes and restaurants along Marine Drive. Now, with the development of three new towers by Landmark Premiere Properties, the community’s town centre is set for a major revitalization.

Foster Martin is a development of 334 homes of between one and four bedrooms. It gets its name from Foster and Martin streets, which run parallel north to south through the heart of White Rock. The development will provide a public, pedestrian connection between the two thoroughfares.

“Our vision was to create a landmark in the town centre by providing homes for downsizers, some commercial and retail space for the business sector and also a public space for the local community,” said Michael Kenchington, project manager for developer Landmark Premiere Properties.

“When you think about White Rock, you think about the waterfront and the pier. We’re hoping that this project will help to put the town centre on the map as a great place to visit in itself. We’re not just building a highrise development here; we’re building a community.”

Health and wellness practitioners, cafés, restaurants, a spa, daycare and other retailers will be located at Foster Martin and Kenchington said that the developers are looking to align with businesses that are about living well. The lifestyle on offer is proving popular with buyers.

“There is a large segment of the population in the Lower Mainland and in South Surrey and White Rock in particular who are looking to downsize,” Kenchington said. “But crucially, they want to do that without having to compromise. Our one-bedroom homes start at around 800 square feet and our two-bedrooms from about 1,100 square feet, which is much more generous than you would typically find in this type of development.”

Fifth Avenue is handling the sales and marketing of Foster Martin. The company’s president and CEO Scott Brown said that there’s a big demand for downsizer-friendly homes in White Rock.

“This is a community that is near a city, near an airport and on the water, but still has a bit of that small-town charm,” Brown said. “The people who live there right now want to stay there, but they realize that the current form of housing isn’t going to meet their needs any more. It’s just too stressful and too large. But up to this point, nobody has been able to offer downsizer-friendly homes right in the town centre.”

Homes at Foster Martin will have nine-foot-high ceilings, engineered wood floors and (for two-bedroom homes and larger) laundry rooms with full-sized washers and dryers, laundry sinks and stone countertops.

“At Foster Martin, every one of our kitchens will be the envy of a full-size home,” Kenchington said. “We’ve got things like 48-inch Miele fridge freezers, 36-inch gas cooktops and integrated wall ovens and microwaves. The other thing we’ve done here is to offer a much broader range of options for buyers to customize their homes than you would find in a typical condo development. Buyers will be able to choose from two distinct lifestyle design schemes, each with two original colour palettes.”

Other kitchen features include either quartz, granite or marble countertops with contiguous slab backsplashes, Miele hood fans and under-mounted stainless-steel sinks with Grohe faucets in polished chrome with integral toggle sprays.

Master bathrooms feature oval soaker tubs with Riobel polished chrome fixtures, floating vanities matched to the kitchen cabinetry and quartz, granite or marble countertops. The showers are enclosed by frameless glass and feature two-piece Riobel contemporary polished chrome rain heads and hand wands.

Foster Martin will also include a 10,000-square-foot health club with a 75-foot indoor/outdoor pool and a hot tub. There’s also a fitness studio, a business lounge, a party room, a billiards/pool room and car and bike-charging stations.

“One of the things we’re most excited about is that we’ll be providing a shuttle bus service to and from the waterfront,” Kenchington said. “People love their walks along the boardwalk, they don’t necessarily want to take on that hill and parking is always a problem down there. The shuttle will mean that residents can get to and from the water without having to drive.”

Homes range in size from 806 to 3,748 square feet and are priced from the mid-$500,000s up to more than $6 million. The first two towers are scheduled for completion in the spring of 2020, by which time White Rock town centre will look strikingly different, according to Brown.

“The civic heart of White Rock has always been at the waterfront,” he said. “What we’re trying to do at Foster Martin is create a second civic heart for the community – an urban pier, if you will – and the response from the locals has been fantastic.”

© 2017 Postmedia Network Inc.

The tax hassles of owning and selling a cottage or second home

Saturday, August 19th, 2017

The biggest tax problem associated with a vacation property is the potential for capital gains tax upon either the sale, or gift of the property, or the death of the owner

JAMIE GOLOMBEK
The Vancouver Sun

As summer winds down, and families prepare to congregate for one final long weekend at the cottage before the school year begins, the tax and estate planning issues surrounding the sale or transfer of your vacation property may become top of mind.

Given the recent tax changes to the principal residence exemption, which now require you to report the disposition of your vacation home in the year of sale, transfer or gift, it becomes more important than ever to understand the tax issues surrounding owing a second home.

Perhaps the biggest tax problem associated with a vacation property is the potential for capital gains tax upon either the sale or gift of the property or upon the death of the owner.

As a general rule, if you sell or gift the property while you are alive, you will be taxed on the difference between the amount you receive (the “proceeds of disposition”) and the tax cost (the “adjusted cost base” or ACB) of the property.

As you make improvements or additions to your vacation property, be sure to keep all receipts as these expenditures can be added to the ACB of the property, thus potentially reducing the amount of future capital gains.

The simplest tax manoeuvre is to simply gift or leave your vacation property to a spouse or commonlaw partner either during your lifetime or upon death. In that case, the property is deemed to automatically “roll over” (i.e., transfer) at its ACB and no gain will be immediately reportable.

On the other hand, parents may wish to give the vacation property to their kids. Doing so will result in an immediate capital gain if the property has gone up in value since the date of acquisition.

The best tax planning opportunity, of course, is to shelter the capital gain on the vacation home by using the principal residence exemption (PRE).

A principal residence can include your vacation property, even if it’s not where you primarily live during the year as long as you, your spouse/ common-law partner or your child ordinarily inhabit it at some point during the year.

Your cottage can be considered to be ordinarily inhabited by someone even if that person lives in that property for only a short period of time during the year (say, during the summer months) as long as the main reason for owning the property is not for the purpose of earning income.

Even if you occasionally rent it out, Canada Revenue Agency has stated that incidental rental income won’t prevent a cottage from qualifying as a principal residence.

Note that the home does not have to be located in Canada to qualify as a principal residence. The only requirement is that the individual who claims the PRE must be a resident of Canada for each year of claim.

For example, a U.S vacation property owned by a Canadian resident may be eligible for designation as a principal residence for the purposes of claiming the PRE. Of course, whether or not that’s advisable will depend on both the income and estate tax considerations of the other country.

In the good old days — that is, before 1982 — it was possible for each spouse (or partner) to own a property and designate it as his or her principal residence, with any resulting capital gains being tax free upon disposition.

Since then, a couple can only designate one property between them as their principal residence for any particular calendar year. This becomes a challenge when a couple owns more than one home and is forced to choose, upon ultimate sale of one property, which one will be designated the principal residence for each year during the period of multihome ownership.

As a result, a conscious decision needs to be made when you sell one of your personal residential properties as to whether that property should be designated your principal residence to shelter the capital gain from tax. Doing so will preclude you from using the PRE in the future on the sale of your other property, at least during the overlapping years.

Generally, the decision to claim the PRE when you sell your vacation property — as opposed to saving it for the disposition of, perhaps, your city home — will depend on a number of factors, including: the average annual gain on each property (the gain on each property divided by the number of years each was held), the potential for future increases or decreases in the value of the unsold property, and the anticipated holding period of the unsold property.

Non-economic factors may also come into play as you may be more concerned about a current, immediate tax liability today versus a tax liability payable later (say, upon death, by your estate) on the sale of your other property.

In the past, the CRA stated that you didn’t have to report the sale of your home or vacation property if the entire gain was exempt as a result of the PRE. But the rules were changed in 2016 to require you to report the disposition of a residence on Schedule 3, Capital Gains of your tax return to be eligible to claim the PRE.

This means that the gift, transfer or sale of your cottage, even if fully tax exempt, will now be on the CRA’s radar, should it choose to take a closer look at the transaction.

Bottom line? Be sure to keep good records of your ACB and, in the case of transfer or gift, it may be useful to have a proper appraisal of your cottage property handy as of the date of transfer/gift to help establish its fair market value should the CRA come knocking at your door.

© 2017 Financial Post,

334 homes development names from Foster and Martin Streets

Saturday, August 19th, 2017

Foster Martin set to transform White Rock town centre

Simon Brault
The Vancouver Sun

An artist’s rendering of Foster Martin, a project from Landmark Premiere Properties Ltd., in White Rock. [PNG Merlin Archive] PNG PNG

For many decades, White Rock has been famous for its waterfront: its wooden pier and promenade, the 500-ton white boulder that sits on miles of sandy beach and the shops, cafes and restaurants along Marine Drive. Now, with the development of three new towers by Landmark Premiere Properties, the community’s town centre is set for a major revitalization.

Foster Martin is a development of 334 homes of between one and four bedrooms. It gets its name from Foster and Martin streets, which run parallel north to south through the heart of White Rock. The development will provide a public, pedestrian connection between the two thoroughfares.

“Our vision was to create a landmark in the town centre by providing homes for downsizers, some commercial and retail space for the business sector and also a public space for the local community,” said Michael Kenchington, project manager for developer Landmark Premiere Properties.

“When you think about White Rock, you think about the waterfront and the pier. We’re hoping that this project will help to put the town centre on the map as a great place to visit in itself. We’re not just building a highrise development here; we’re building a community.”

Health and wellness practitioners, cafés, restaurants, a spa, daycare and other retailers will be located at Foster Martin and Kenchington said that the developers are looking to align with businesses that are about living well. The lifestyle on offer is proving popular with buyers.

“There is a large segment of the population in the Lower Mainland and in South Surrey and White Rock in particular who are looking to downsize,” Kenchington said. “But crucially, they want to do that without having to compromise. Our one-bedroom homes start at around 800 square feet and our two-bedrooms from about 1,100 square feet, which is much more generous than you would typically find in this type of development.”

Fifth Avenue is handling the sales and marketing of Foster Martin. The company’s president and CEO Scott Brown said that there’s a big demand for downsizer-friendly homes in White Rock.

“This is a community that is near a city, near an airport and on the water, but still has a bit of that small-town charm,” Brown said. “The people who live there right now want to stay there, but they realize that the current form of housing isn’t going to meet their needs any more. It’s just too stressful and too large. But up to this point, nobody has been able to offer downsizer-friendly homes right in the town centre.”

Foster Martin is a project from Landmark Premiere Properties Ltd. in White Rock. [Credit Amanda  Oster/Provoke Studios]  Photo by Provoke Studios /PNG

 

Homes at Foster Martin will have nine-foot-high ceilings, engineered wood floors and (for two-bedroom homes and larger) laundry rooms with full-sized washers and dryers, laundry sinks and stone countertops.

“At Foster Martin, every one of our kitchens will be the envy of a full-size home,” Kenchington said. “We’ve got things like 48-inch Miele fridge freezers, 36-inch gas cooktops and integrated wall ovens and microwaves. The other thing we’ve done here is to offer a much broader range of options for buyers to customize their homes than you would find in a typical condo development. Buyers will be able to choose from two distinct lifestyle design schemes, each with two original colour palettes.”

Foster Martin is a project from Landmark Premiere Properties Ltd. in White Rock. [Credit Amanda Oster/Provoke Studios] Photo by Provoke Studios /PNG

Other kitchen features include either quartz, granite or marble countertops with contiguous slab backsplashes, Miele hood fans and under-mounted stainless-steel sinks with Grohe faucets in polished chrome with integral toggle sprays.

Master bathrooms feature oval soaker tubs with Riobel polished chrome fixtures, floating vanities matched to the kitchen cabinetry and quartz, granite or marble countertops. The showers are enclosed by frameless glass and feature two-piece Riobel contemporary polished chrome rain heads and hand wands.

Foster Martin will also include a 10,000-square-foot health club with a 75-foot indoor/outdoor pool and a hot tub. There’s also a fitness studio, a business lounge, a party room, a billiards/pool room and car and bike-charging stations.

 

“One of the things we’re most excited about is that we’ll be providing a shuttle bus service to and from the waterfront,” Kenchington said. “People love their walks along the boardwalk, they don’t necessarily want to take on that hill and parking is always a problem down there. The shuttle will mean that residents can get to and from the water without having to drive.”

Foster Martin is a project from Landmark Premiere Properties Ltd. in White Rock. [Credit Amanda Oster/Provoke Studios]  Photo by Provoke Studios /PNG

Homes range in size from 806 to 3,748 square feet and are priced from the mid-$500,000s up to more than $6 million. The first two towers are scheduled for completion in the spring of 2020, by which time White Rock town centre will look strikingly different, according to Brown.

“The civic heart of White Rock has always been at the waterfront,” he said. “What we’re trying to do at Foster Martin is create a second civic heart for the community – an urban pier, if you will – and the response from the locals has been fantastic.”

Foster Martin

Project location: 1484 Martin Street

Project size: 334 homes in three towers, one to four bedrooms ranging from 806 to 3,748 square feet. Prices range from the mid-$500,000s up to more than $6 million

Developer: Landmark Premiere Properties Ltd.

Architect: IBI Group

Interior designer: Studio Finlay

Sales centre: #105 — 1688 152nd Street

Sales phone: 604-531-7111

Hours: noon — 5 p.m. daily

Website: www.fostermartin.ca

 

© 2021 Vancouver Sun

Home equity loans a risk

Friday, August 18th, 2017

Lenders say they fulfil a need; critics warn of dangers, high costs

Dan Fumano
The Vancouver Sun

Their ads trumpet the ease of using the equity in your home to get cash.

Alpine Credits helps customers get loans approved “regardless of your credit, age, or income,” the company’s commercials say. In a Capital Direct radio spot, veteran B.C. broadcaster Bill Good encourages listeners to call one of the company’s “friendly” advisers “if you could use any amount up to $300,000 or more,” telling them “it’s your money.”

While federally regulated banks dominate Canada’s residential mortgage lending market, accounting for more than 80 per cent, business appears to be growing for many “alternative” lenders, including two of the most visible B.C. companies, Capital Direct and Alpine Credits, who say they have provided more than $1 billion of loans each.

Representatives of home equity lending companies say they provide a valuable service, filling a need for Canadians unable to get loans from conventional, regulated financial institutions. Both defenders and critics of alternative mortgage lenders say more Canadians are turning to these less-regulated lenders as Ottawa has tightened lending requirements at federally regulated financial institutions. A Bank of Canada report from late last year said: “Tightening bank regulation … can lead to migration of activity from the traditional banking sector” to alternatives.

The breezy tone of their ads doesn’t sit well with a number of credit counsellors and foreclosure lawyers. They say that while these alternative lenders aren’t breaking any rules, the public needs to better understand what’s behind the catchy jingles: high costs and potential risk.

Typically, a home-equity loan is short-term (two years or less) and is secured against a borrower’s home as a second or third mortgage. Regulatory filings for Capital Direct and Ryan Mortgage Income Fund (a company affiliated with Alpine Credits, which purchases its mortgages) show a range of interest rates, often between 10 and 15 per cent. A small number of Capital Direct’s loans have interest rates as high as 25 per cent. Canada’s major banks have offered five-year fixed mortgage rates between 2.59 and 2.99 per cent in recent months. 

The upfront fees charged by some alternative lenders can be significant, with five-figure sums charged before a loan is issued.

Most home equity borrowers use the money for renovations or to consolidate debt, according to a 2016 survey by Canadian Mortgage Professionals. But borrowed funds can be used for any purpose, which concerns credit counsellors at a time when Canadians are increasingly willing to use debt to fund their lifestyles.

Some ads for alternative mortgage lenders highlight that loans can be used to fund any frivolous purpose a homeowner chooses. In one Alpine Credits commercial, a cartoon “approval specialist” says an applicant “wants a loan to add a four-storey waterslide to his home.” After establishing the applicant is a homeowner, the narrator announces “He’s approved!” as the room erupts in cheers. Confetti rains down. Champagne sprays around.

Abdul Rahimi said he learned about Alpine Credits “through all these advertisements on TV 24/7.”

He wanted to start his own business, he said, and because he’d owned his Port Coquitlam home for more than a decade, he applied for a home-equity loanBut after his business hit a rough patch, he said, he had trouble making the payments. He defaulted on the loan last year and Ryan Mortgage (the Alpine Credits-affiliated company) started a foreclosure action against his home.

Rahimi said Alpine and Ryan Mortgage did not mislead him. Shaken by the experience, he blamed himself for not fully understanding what he signed up for.

“It’s not their fault. They’re in business, they’re trying to make money,” he said. “I never blamed any of these creditors. I blame myself.”

But when asked what he would tell a friend considering taking out a home-equity loan, Rahimi said: “I would tell them, ‘Never touch it.’ I don’t advise anyone to go with this kind of high interest rate.”

Some chartered banks also offer home equity loans, but at “very reasonable” interest rates and “little to no fees,” said Kin Lo, an accounting professor at UBC’s Sauder School of Business. Banks’ home equity loans are very different products, Lo said, than those offered by alternative lenders.

After reviewing details of home equity loans offered by alternative mortgage lenders, Lo said: “These products are being targeted toward unsophisticated and uninformed homeowners. No one who is even a little bit familiar with loans and mortgages would pay interest rates this high, and pay so much in upfront fees.”

Examples of the fees can be seen in documents filed with B.C. courts in connection with foreclosure actions. One case includes a loan agreement obtained by a 79-year-old pensioner from a Ryan Mortgage-affiliated company. The fixed credit disclosure statement for the loan details the fees, which include: a brokerage fee, lender fee, application fee, appraisal/other fee, and estimated legal fee and disbursements totalling $15,088 — about nine per cent of the principal amount of the mortgage ($168,100).

B.C. lawyers who work in foreclosures said the fees in that example are on the higher side, but not uncommon for mortgages from alternative lenders.

When you see alternative mortgage lenders charging high interest rates, Lo said, it suggests they “are not vetting the borrowers like the banks are. … The high interest rates anticipate high rates of default.

“If the homeowners are able to borrow from a bank (or credit union), they would be much better off doing so,” Lo said. “If they aren’t able to borrow from a bank, then they shouldn’t resort to borrowing from these ‘alternative mortgage lenders’ because doing so will just get them into debt that will be very difficult to pay off.”

Firm numbers are hard to come by in this sector. A Bank of Canada report last year said “significant gaps remain in data and knowledge” in the country’s alternative financial sector, and “are likely to remain.”

Samantha Gale, CEO of the Mortgage Brokers Association of B.C., said it’s hard to say how much alternative mortgage lending has grown in the past decade. “There are no records to draw upon — we know that it has grown and continues to grow,” she said, adding it’s estimated that as much as $7 billion is under administration by alternative mortgage lenders, including home equity lenders, in B.C.

When a borrower defaults on a mortgage, whether a first mortgage from a big bank or a second or third mortgage from an alternative lender, it can lead to foreclosure, which sometimes result in a court-supervised, forced sale of the property so lenders can recover the outstanding value of the loan.

Foreclosures are rare in B.C. because, in a hot housing market, borrowers who get into trouble can usually sell their home quickly to “bail themselves out,” said Scott Hannah, president of the Credit Counselling Society. But, Hannah said, if there’s a correction in property prices, the number of foreclosures could rise.

Hannah has seen the impact foreclosures can have on families, forcing them to uproot and move, he said. “It takes a real toll on people. It goes beyond finances.” 

Canadians’ willingness to take on debt has grown dramatically in the past decade. Last year, Statistics Canada reported, the level of debt held by Canadians exceeded the country’s gross domestic product for the first time.

“People are using debt to finance their expenses,” Hannah said. “We’ve really kind of changed as a culture: Canadians used to be known as a nation of savers. And now we’re a nation of debtors.”

As for Bill Good, Capital Direct’s main pitchman, Hannah had this to say: “Just because somebody is a spokesperson with a very good reputation and past, it doesn’t mean the product is right for you. … When you see someone like Bill Good, who is a spokesperson and, let’s face it, Bill Good has a very good reputation, has been trusted by consumers for decades, I think that builds a lot of credibility. I worry that people think, ‘Well, OK, he wouldn’t be doing that if he didn’t think the service was upfront and was really there to help people.’” 

Good is one of the province’s best-known journalists with a 50-year career in radio and TV, lifetime achievement awards, and an honorary doctorate from BCIT. Good’s radio editorials run eight times every weekday on News 1130 and this year he began writing a column for the Glacier chain of newspapers.

In an interview, Good said: “I checked out Capital Direct pretty carefully before I went to work with them. They have an outstanding rating with the Better Business Bureau. I’ve interviewed a number of people who’ve borrowed from them, all of whom expressed considerable satisfaction.”

Capital Direct and Alpine Credits both have A+ ratings from the Better Business Bureau of B.C., evaluations the bureau says are based on a wide range of factors.

“From my point of view, I’m quite comfortable with it, because I’ve had no backlash,” said Good. 

“Capital Direct has been around for quite a while, but there’s a bit of a proliferation of companies coming into the market to fill the void that’s being left behind by the banks and the Finance (Department) making it tougher to get loans. And I don’t pretend to be an expert, but my understanding is that a large percentage of the people borrowing money from companies like Capital Direct would have been borrowing from the banks three or four years ago, and it’s just become more and more difficult to get money from the banks,” Good said. “I think it’s filling a need.”

“It’s not a situation where we’re trying to rope people in who aren’t suited,” David Rally, Capital Direct’s vice-president of legal affairs, said in an interview. “That’s bad for business. We want people who can manage the loan. … But given the rules the federal government has passed, it has become increasingly difficult for people to access bank loans, which sends them looking for other alternatives, and that’s sort of what we do.

“I can’t speak for the rest of the industry. … But we spend a lot of money on advertising and we try and put our presence out there. It’s a good time for this type of business, but our goal, obviously, is to make sure we have borrowers who are properly positioned so we’re providing a service that’s going to help them, and we’re not going to obviously impair our own business,” Rally said.

Second and third mortgages from alternative lenders tend to default at higher rates than first mortgages, said Sid Rajeev, head of research for Fundamental Research Corp. The rate of mortgages in arrears 90 days or more for home equity loans from mortgage investment corporations is still low, Rajeev said, estimating around two per cent, but that could be eight times higher than the rate of residential mortgages in arrears from federally regulated banks, which the Canadian Bankers Association reports is 0.25 per cent.

Rajeev specializes in researching alternative mortgage lenders and mortgage investment corporations (or MICs), including secondary lenders like Capital Direct and Alpine (and Ryan Mortgage). The CMHC commissioned Rajeev to provide an overview of this sector in 2015 with a report called “Growth and Risk Profile of the Unregulated Mortgage Lending Sector.” 

There’s a fundamental difference, Rajeev said, in how banks and alternative lenders assess whether to lend to a borrower: “The banks, when they lend, they focus more on the borrower’s credit and income to see if they can repay on a regular basis. While these kinds of (alternative) lenders, they do more asset-based lending, so they’re more worried about the fundamentals of the collateral, the underlying asset, and not much on the borrower.”

Rajeev said alternative lenders can be the best option for recent immigrants or self-employed people who want to borrow funds but don’t have the credit rating to obtain a loan from a bank.

Representatives of Alpine Credits and Ryan Mortgage declined to be interviewed or answer questions by email.

A director of Alpine’s parent company, Amur Financial Group, declined to talk about the business but said customers must obtain independent legal advice before entering into a loan agreement.

Capital Direct requires borrowers to obtain independent legal advice before taking out a loan, Rally said, but not independent financial advice. 

The value of borrowers obtaining not only legal advice but also independent financial advice was stressed in interviews with foreclosure lawyers and credit counsellors.

Chris Carter, B.C.’s acting registrar of mortgage brokers, did not discuss specific companies, but in an emailed statement, said, generally speaking: “There is a risk of predatory lending practices in equity lending and the registrar is vigilant in monitoring for that activity. That is why we advise not only independent legal advice, but also independent financial advice. … Independent financial advice provides an enhanced level of scrutiny and protection.” 

Capital Direct and Alpine Credits declined to provide their default rates.

Priyan Samarakoone, a lawyer with Access Pro Bono who has tried to help dozens of borrowers facing foreclosures in the past four years, said many cases involve a borrower who’s saddled with a high-interest home equity loan and stretched thin so that when an unexpected challenge comes up — like job loss, illness, an accident or divorce — it leads quickly to financial trouble.

“Your world can go down very quickly if one bad thing happens to you. You need to be aware of that,” he said. 

There’s another reason for caution, Samarakoone said. In a time, when good pensions are increasingly rare and the rising cost of living makes it harder to save, there’s a concern that drawing down the built-up equity in your home can shortchange your future.

“A good way of looking at what your home really is, is as an investment for you and your kids and the future,” he said. “And if you think your home is an ATM or a bank machine and you can just use money against it, you end up with nothing for the future.”

Still, Samarakoone said, alternative lenders sometimes fill a need. He’s helped clients in the past who have found themselves needing cash and unable to borrow from banks. Depending on the details of their situation and the terms offered by the lender, he’s helped people through situations where a home-equity loan was their best available option. However, he said, borrowers always need to get careful legal and financial advice and enter the agreement with a clear understanding.

“It’s not to demonize these things,” he said. “It’s just that you have to get the proper advice before you do it and you have to consider everything.”

© 2018 Postmedia Network Inc.

Fight over nine-inch railings nails strata owners with big bill

Thursday, August 17th, 2017

Prolonged dispute starting with $30,000 in renos ballooned into $200,000 in costs

Ian Mulgrew
The Vancouver Sun

A strata dispute over about $30,000 in rooftop renovations has dragged through the courts and morphed into a bitter debate over $200,000 in legal and other costs.

The neighbour-versus-neighbour battle exemplifies why such squabbles were moved out of the courts last year and into the Civil Resolution Tribunal, which provides a ruling for about $250 in fees.

The owners of a Homer Street strata building lost at trial, lost in the court of appeal and now say they have been staggered by a demand for special costs.

Ken Waters, president of the 58-unit building, remains apoplectic about the drawn-out disagreement — he can’t believe the judgments and he’s incredulous at the claim.

He explained the strata has so far paid $23,600 with $8,800 pending for the roof renovations — about a $540 for each unit in the building — but that would jump to $3,333 a unit if another $196,000 for legal and other costs is incurred.

“He’s paying himself $110,000 — obviously, we were shocked by this,” Waters said brandishing the bill from the unit owner who took the strata council to court, Jack Frank, a lawyer.

“He states we acted reprehensibly. Basically, he’s bilking us for an unreal amount of money.”

The 2016 court decision said when Frank bought his unit in the 800 block of Homer it included an area designated as limited common property intended for air conditioning equipment but treated as a “roof deck.”

But Frank learned the parapets were 9.5 inches lower than required by the building code and, in 2005 or 2006, he asked to install railings to make up the difference.

The judgment says the strata initially told Frank OK, subject to city approval.

But planning progressed glacially and in Dec. 2012, when he finally asked for written consent, the strata refused.

“If you’ve seen the video, you can see why we believe it was self-evident that it was a service space for air conditioning,” Waters said.

In June 2013, Frank requested a city building inspection with a view to obtaining an order requiring the strata to upgrade the roof.

Instead, the city told Frank and the strata to stop using the roof except for equipment and maintenance.

In Feb. 2015, Frank suggested new plans to make the roof usable, insisting the strata was responsible for the cost under its “obligation to provide and maintain safe and secure common property.”

When the strata ignored him, Frank filed a petition seeking an order compelling it to pay for the design and installation of the safety guards.

Justice Barbara Fisher agreed with him.

“Since 2004, Mr. Frank used his roof deck for recreational purposes, as did the other top floor owners,” she wrote. “With the knowledge and consent of the strata corporation, he installed cement pavers and patio furniture. This area was important to him, as his suite has no other exterior balconies.”

Her decision was endorsed by the court of appeal.

Frank agreed the case was an example of what was wrong with the legislation that forced strata owners to litigate in Supreme Court — an exorbitant, inaccessible forum for most non-represented litigants.

But he said he could not comment further because of proceedings in the offing.

“There is something called special costs and this is where the conduct of the parties is reviewed to determine whether or not the conduct has been reprehensible and deserving of rebuke, which is the legal phrase that sits in behind special costs,” he explained.

“I am bringing an application essentially seeking a determination on that issue and I’m looking for full indemnification of my legal fees.”

His bill sent to the strata included a fee of $113,120 for 323.2 hours work and roughly $43,000 in disbursements — technical reports, drawings, photocopying, expert opinions. Taxes would add another about $17,000.

In an accompanying letter, Frank wrote: “This account does not include anything for damages arising from the loss of use. … Since I was unable to use the roof deck for a period of four years, damages are an additional $24,000.”

This case is an outlier in the sense that the average condo dispute in Supreme Court costs between $20,000 and $25,000 to resolve.

Still, such an exorbitant process discouraged many from pursuing a complaint and prodded the former Liberal government into creating the tribunal to provide cheaper justice.

Serious issues such as those involving underlying ownership still go to court, but strata-owners can now take their complaints about parking, pools, pets and noisy neighbours to a computer, tablet or cellphone.

“Oh, my goodness, wow!” said Shannon Salter, chair of the tribunal, when she heard about the costs in this case.

About 600 strata disputes have been filed with the tribunal over the last year, she said.

Most were resolved through the tribunal’s facilitation process, with only 56 so far requiring a tribunal decision.

© 2017 Postmedia Network Inc.