Archive for March, 2019

Average B.C. home price has slid nearly 10 per cent in past year: BCREA

Wednesday, March 13th, 2019

Real estate association blames mortgage stress test for ?sidelining? buyers, calls for feds to scrap it entirely

Joannah Connolly
Western Investor

The federal mortgage stress test is to blame for a drop in sales that has led to an average B.C. home price decline of nearly 10 per cent, according to the British Columbia Real Estate Association (BCREA).

In its February 2019 market report, released March 13, the BCREA said that there were 4,533 MLS home sales in B.C. in February, which is 27 per cent lower than February 2018.

The average MLS home sale price in the province last month was $678,625, a drop of 9.3 per cent from one year previously.

The combination of lower sales and falling prices meant that total residential resale dollar volume in February was down 33.8 per cent year over year, to $3.08 billion.

Falling home sales across the province have led to a rise in available home inventory. Listings on the MLS have risen by 36.5 per cent over a year to 30,891 homes for sale in B.C. This brings the overall sales-to-active-listings ratio to a balanced market, at 14.7 per cent, compared with the strong seller’s market at 27.4 per cent one year previously.

As ever, markets vary widely across the province, and a decline in the average provincial sales prices doesn’t necessarily mean better affordability in certain areas or among certain home types. Of the 12 real estate boards cited in BCREA’s report, 10 saw February home sales down from a year ago, but seven boards are still seeing higher average home prices than one year previously. These areas are Victoria, Vancouver Island, Powell River, Kamloops, Kootenay, Chilliwack and B.C. Northern.

Of the larger markets, the area to see the biggest annual price decline was Greater Vancouver, at 11.5 per cent. A significant reduction in sales of expensive Metro Vancouver detached homes has brought down the average sales price significantly, while entry-level home prices have not fallen by as much.

Calls to scrap stress test

The BCREA is now repeating its calls for the federal government to scrap the mortgage stress test. In a note released this week, BCREA chief executive officer Darlene Hyde said, “We would like to see a review and reconsideration of the current mortgage underwriting ‘stress test,’ as well as a return to 30-year amortizations for federally insured mortgages. These rules must be changed now before B.C. families are left further behind.”

Hyde said that it was not only the real estate market that was affected by the stress test, but also the wider economy. “The B-20 stress test is also having a negative impact on homeowner equity, family spending and the housing stock itself. There’s a knock-on effect to the overall economy as families who are worried about declining home equity cut back on retail spending, home renovations and other products and services.”

However, the dampening national economy could potentially result in improved housing affordability, which in turn could spark in a turnaround in home sales. While many pundits had previously forecast further interest rate hikes this year, the Bank of Canada’s dovish stance on the back of the slowing economy has held overnight rates steady, and there is now talk of possible interest rate reductions. Government bond yields, which dictate fixed mortgage rates, are at an 18-month low, which is likely to push mortgage lenders to reduce their fixed rates. This could ease pressure on buyers subject to the mortgage stress test, creating a little more affordability that could prompt an uptick in home purchases.

“Falling mortgage rates should provide some relief for homebuyers, providing a small boost to affordability heading into the spring,” added Ogmundson.

Copyright © Western Investor

Speculation and Vacancy Tax – BC 30 point report

Tuesday, March 12th, 2019

Speculation and Vacancy Tax – BC 30 point report

other

Download Document

Real estate disruptor ranks Canadian cities for public transport

Tuesday, March 12th, 2019

Redfin has launched a new ranking system

Steve Randall
Canadian Real Estate Wealth

One of the newest names in Canadian real estate has launched a new ranking to help homebuyers find the best cities for convenient public transportation.

Redfin firm Walk Score’s inaugural Transit Score rankings put Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal at the top of the list of big cities with populations of 300,000+.

“Toronto is highly populated and growing all the time. The influx of people from all over the world to Toronto puts a strain on all aspects of transportation in regards to road infrastructure and traffic in and out of the city, which is nothing less than gridlock,” said Blair Anderson, broker of record and market manager for Redfin in Toronto.

Toronto’s score of 78 and Vancouver’s 74 puts them above several major US cities including Boston (72), and Washington DC (71). Montreal ties with Philadelphia on 64. Toronto is also close to San Francisco’s score of 80.

“Some people moan and complain about public transit, but Toronto’s system is one of the better transit systems in the world,” added Anderson. “It’s highly ranked, runs well on a timely basis, and doesn’t have many problems. And without it, the city would shut down.”

Here is the full ranking of the top 15 large cities (with populations of more than 300,000) in Canada for public transit in 2019:

Rank

City

Transit Score

1

Toronto

78

2

Vancouver

74

3

Montréal

67

4

Mississauga

56

5

Brampton

53

6

Winnipeg

51

7

Calgary

50

8

Ottawa

50

9

Edmonton

49

10

Markham

49

11

Québec

47

12

Surrey

47

13

Laval

46

14

Hamilton

45

15

London

45

 Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Non-residents own 3.7% of B.C. homes, much higher in new units: CMHC

Tuesday, March 12th, 2019

Relatively small percentage of province’s homes are jointly owned by resident and non-resident owners, says federal housing agency

Joannah Connolly
Western Investor

Source: CMHC/Statistics Canada

Source: CMHC/Statistics Canada

Source: CMHC/Statistics Canada

While there is a common perception that overseas buyers have snapped up much of the real estate in B.C.’s major cities, the number of homes in the province owned purely by non-residents is 3.7 per cent, according to a study of Statistics Canada data by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), published March 12.

Including homes that are jointly owned by a mix of residents of Canada and non-residents – such as a satellite family where one spouse is resident in Canada, or a local student who jointly owns a home with their overseas parents – adds another 2.5 per cent. This brings the total proportion of B.C. homes with some “non-resident participation” to 6.2 per cent, said CMHC.

However, the proportion of non-resident ownership varies dramatically when broken out by property type and by year of construction.

Just 2.6 per cent of B.C.’s single-family homes were owned entirely by foreign nationals, compared with condos, where 7.6 per cent were found to be owned entirely by overseas residents.

The share of the province’s homes owned purely by overseas residents was found to increase dramatically among newer properties, rising to a peak of nearly nine per cent built in the frenzied 2016/2017 market.

CMHC found that the median value of homes owned by non-residents in Metro Vancouver and across B.C. was higher than the median value of homes owned by Canadian residents.

The non-resident-owned median assessment value of a single-family house in British Columbia was $236,000, or 36.7 per cent, higher than the median-valued resident-owned detached house in B.C.

The largest assessed value difference between non-resident and resident-owned detached houses is $1,580,000 (31.2 per cent) in the Metro Vancouver Electoral Area A, which includes the UBC neighbourhood and the University Endowment Lands. Vancouver proper saw the second highest value difference, at $1.1 million more than the median resident-owned detached house (22.3 per cent higher).

Aled ab Iorwerth, deputy chief economist at CMHC, said, “The data allows us to better understand the role of non-residents as a component of demand in Canadian housing markets, a topic that is of public interest in terms of the source of funds and the investment behaviour associated with such properties.”

Copyright © Western Investor

B-20 Stress Test Needs Revision to Improve Housing Affordability

Tuesday, March 12th, 2019

BC government needs to revise stress test

BCREA

The British Columbia Real Estate Association (BCREA) is calling on the federal government to revisit the B-20 stress test so that more BC families can achieve their dream of homeownership. Mortgage lending rules, known as the B-20 stress test, have eroded housing affordability by reducing the purchasing power of families by as much as 20 per cent. Introduced last year, the stress test forces even the most credit-worthy borrowers with large down payments to qualify at an interest rate that is two percentage points above the rate they negotiate with their bank.

“We would like to see a review and reconsideration of the current mortgage underwriting ‘stress test,’ as well as a return to 30-year amortizations for federally insured mortgages,” says BCREA chief executive officer Darlene Hyde. “These rules must be changed now before BC families are left further behind.” The stress test has caused a sharp decline in the attainability of homeownership in Canada. Since its implementation, home sales have declined 18 per cent across the country. Canada’s largest urban centres, where lack of affordability was especially acute before the new rules came into effect, have been hardest hit.

Home sales have declined nearly 25 per cent in Toronto and more than 45 per cent in Vancouver over the same period.

“The B-20 stress test is also having a negative impact on homeowner equity, family spending and the housing stock itself,” adds Hyde. “There’s a knock-on effect to the overall economy as families who are worried about declining home equity cut back on retail spending, home renovations and other products and services.”

A sharp decline in housing demand also causes home builders to pull back on production, arguably when it’s needed most, leading to slower growth of the housing stock and yet another supply crunch coupled with upward pressure on home prices down the road. Accordingly, the Canadian Home Builders’ Association has expressed similar concerns regarding the B-20 stress test, and the Canadian Real Estate Association and Toronto Real Estate Board have recently made similar appeals.

When families are locked out of the housing market by the strictest of mortgage rules, even the BC government treasury is affected. The sharp decline in home sales caused by the B-20 stress test has cost the government $400 million in lost Property Transfer Tax revenues alone, money that could have been used for health care, education and affordable housing.

Copyright ©2019 BCREA

Metro Vancouver residential land prices may have already peaked

Tuesday, March 12th, 2019

Land Prices have peaked

Frank O’Brien
Western Investor

Take a good look at the prices paid for residential development land in Metro Vancouver last year, as Colliers International did in its annual LandShare Report, because it could be a while before you see them any higher.

In 2018, Metro residential land sales hit $627 million, which would be an all-time high were it not for the incredible spike during 2016 and 2017 when sales easily crested the $1.1 billon mark for the first time.

The downward shift began in the last half of 2018, as an avalanche of government policies, interest rate hikes and a subsequent 40 per cent plunge in housing sales hammered developer and consumer confidence, noted Casey Weeks, senior vice-president, investment, at Colliers.

Sales of all types of land, including commercial holding property, residential land assemblies and farmland, had started slowing earlier, reported the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver. In a tracking of transactions through B.C.’s land titles, the board found that land sales in the third quarter 2018 had fallen 34.8 per cent from the same period a year earlier and the value of total land sales had dropped by nearly 15 per cent to $2 billion.

Still, developers were paying eye-popping prices for high-density residential land in the second half of last year. The record price could be the $164.7 million that British-based Harlow Holdings Ltd. paid for just under an acre of land (43,255 square feet) in downtown Vancouver. A few blocks away, Vancouver’s Skyllen Pacific Development paid $58.7 million for a 30,226-square-foot Pendrell Street site zoned for a floor space ratio (FSR) of 2.75 (which means that more than 83,000 square feet of residences could be developed). 

On Vancouver’s tony west side, land zoned for high-density housing easily topped $40 million an acre last year. Colliers reported that, based on land values, the average cost for every buildable square foot for a residential development on Vancouver’s west side is now from $450 to $550 per square foot. That cost is just for the land and excludes construction costs and all soft costs, such as taxes, legal costs, development fees, marketing, financing and any developer profit.

Vancouver has by far the highest combined per-buildable-square foot costs and construction prices in Canada, according to Altus Group’s 2019 Construction Cost Guide. Altus estimates that Vancouver now requires an end-sale price a third higher than in second-place Toronto.

It  is not uncommon for new concrete condos in Vancouver to top $1,400 per square foot, and the average is $1,345 per square foot.

Suburban land values in Metro Vancouver also spiralled in 2018. In the second half of last year, Anthem Properties Corp. closed on a 1.5-acre residential site in Coquitlam near a SkyTrain station. It paid $40.5 million. Townline Homes Inc. paid $34.4 million for a high-density 51,529-square-foot parcel on North Road, Coquitlam, which pencilled to $148 per buildable square foot at an FSR of 4.5. 

Surrey provides some of the lowest-cost land for residential in the region, but it is not uncommon for high-density sites to sell for $10 million per acre or more. RDG Management Ltd. paid $30.6 million last year for 3.2-acre site in Central Surrey with an FSR of 3.5.; and a B.C. numbered company snapped up a 7.5 FSR site of nearly 1.5 acres on the King George Highway for $54 million late in 2018.

Some land speculators have been blindsided by municipal governments. In North Vancouver district, where prime residential land can sell for $470 per buildable square foot, the newly elected district council suddenly nixed a new rental project last year. The project had been in the works for two years. A townhouse development by Boffo Properties was also rejected, though the previous council had also approved it. In Surrey, a new city council killed a light rail transit (LRT) plan, despite funding approval, and after developers had paid up to $4 million an acre for land along the planned LRT route.

“Developers need a consistent municipal plan,” said Weeks, a land specialist at Colliers, pointing to Coquitlam as an example. However, Weeks added that the mortgage stress test and other regulations have also slashed the pre-sales that condo developers depend on for financing. He forecasts that some planned condo projects from smaller developers simply won’t proceed.

Even big players are concerned. Neil Chrystal, president of Polygon Homes Ltd. and a panellist at the recent Urban Development Institute forecast luncheon, is among them.

“How does the bottom line look after you factor in much more expensive construction costs? Because if the numbers don’t make sense, we won’t move forward,” Chrystal said. 

 “We all need to go out and get pre-sales to get our financing, and financing is going to be tougher,” he added. “The big banks say, ‘We’re only going to be financing our Tier 1 developers.’ They’ve only got so much money to put out there.” 

Glacier Community Media © Copyright ® 2013 – 2019

Commercial property market heavily leans upon tech companies

Tuesday, March 12th, 2019

Suburban locations ideal for commercial investments

Ephraim Vecina
Canadian Real Estate Wealth

The tech segment now serves as a vital bedrock of the Canadian commercial real estate sector, according to a new analysis by Marcus & Millichap.

In its newly released 2019 Commercial Real Estate Canada Investment Forecast study, Marcus & Millichap noted that tech firms’ demand for usable space will foster greater investment in the oft-ignored outskirts of major metropolitan markets.

“Elevated pricing expectations and fewer high-quality listings in downtown areas motivate investors to broaden search parameters to suburban locations near major metros. Higher yields beyond the urban core will be a large driver to sales activity in 2019,” the report stated.

Moreover, tech giants such as Microsoft, Google, and Amazon – which have already taken roost in Canada’s leading commercial markets – have been predicted to hire new workers in the tens of thousands over the next few years, as well as spend billions in office expansions during that same period.

“Microsoft currently has 2,300 employees in the country and 14,000 partners, which could grow to 60,000 overall jobs between employees and partners. Amazon will also grow substantially with plans for 6,000 new jobs across corporate offices in Vancouver and Toronto and multiple new fulfillment centres,” the report explained.

Toronto, as a globally acknowledged leader in innovation, will immensely benefit from this trend.

“Microsoft, Intel, Uber and others have plans to increase operations in the city and bring on new workers. Additionally, in recent years an abundance of international retailers have made a push into Canada, often landing on Toronto when deciding on their first location in the country.”

“Sidewalk Labs, a sister company to Google, will undertake one of the greatest projects as they transform Toronto’s waterfront to a smart city of the future, which will be anchored by Google’s new Canadian headquarters.”

Montreal hosts two of Canada’s top-tier universities, along with a burgeoning artificial intelligence R&D scene. This is “encouraging the development of new purpose-built rentals to meet the growing demand. Rental rent growth will remain robust this year despite a new delivery high for the current cycle, drawing more investment capital to the apartment sector.”

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Multi-family starts predominant in the hottest markets

Tuesday, March 12th, 2019

CMHC said multi-family complexes major construct starts

Ephraim Vecina
Canadian Real Estate Wealth

In recent months, more multi-family buildings were constructed than any other housing type in Canada’s hottest markets, according to a new report by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.

“The national trend in housing starts resumed its downward trajectory in February while still remaining above historical average,” CMHC chief economist Bob Dugan said.

The Crown corporation said that despite the nationwide housing starts trend falling to 203,554 units in February 2019 (from the 207,742 units exactly a year before), multi-family complexes represented much of recent home construction activity.

“Both single-detached and multi-unit dwellings starts trended lower. Higher mortgage rates combined with still-favourable, but less stimulative economic conditions have contributed to softer demand on new home markets in urban centres.”

Vancouver, in particular, saw the predominance of multi-unit buildings in new projects. Condo starts significantly increased in the 12 months ending February 2019, accounting for 77% of the city’s new housing units last month. In contrast, single-detached starts fell by 24% annually.

Meanwhile, Toronto’s lower February numbers mainly stemmed from low condo apartment starts, although demand for the asset class is not stopping any time soon as “sales of new condominium apartment starts have been strong in 2017 and 2018 and these units will continue to break ground throughout this year at a varying pace.”

“Row and semi-detached home starts trended higher underlining their popularity among buyers looking for lower priced ground-oriented homes,” the CMHC noted

On the other hand, Montreal’s total housing starts decreased by 47% year-over-year in February, but “rental apartment construction has continued to show strong growth. The low vacancy rates, the aging of the population and the greater proportion of young households now opting for the rental market have continued to stimulate rental housing starts,” the CMHC stated.

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

A first-time homebuyer’s guide to avoiding the house poor trap

Monday, March 11th, 2019

House poorness is not uncommon

Michelle McNally
other

Life likes to deal us surprises from time to time — a job loss, a chronic illness, an unfortunate fender bender. As a homeowner, any one of these sudden changes can throw you off your game, financially speaking, but if you’re house poor, even a minor expense change can have catastrophic consequences.

House poorness occurs when a large portion of your income goes towards your housing expenses, leaving little leftover for savings, discretionary spending or emergency funds. House poorness is not uncommon; an Ipsos poll by MNP published in January found that nearly half of Canadians are $200 or less away from being unable to pay their bills. A fluctuation in interest rates or a sudden expense can bring a house poor owner to their knees, Laurie Campbell, CEO of Credit Canada Debt Solutions explains.

“You’re really fighting a situation where anything that happens becomes too much,” she says.

House poorness falls on a spectrum of intensity. For some, not having much financial wiggle room means no vacations or new cars. For others, it’s the difference between paying the mortgage and saving for retirement.

“The more serious version of house poor that I think people are just starting to see, and possibly for a couple more years, is people who not only can’t afford to do those discretionary spending types of things, but who also cannot save for retirement, save for children’s education, other things that are really important to do as well,” says Jason Heath, managing director of Objective Financial Partners Inc.

While the prospect of house poorness is frightening, it can be prevented through detailed planning, budgeting and thinking into the future. Campbell and Heath share how you can avoid house poorness, even before you sign those mortgage documents.

Want to retire? Buy from the bottom

While it’s expected that Canada’s hottest housing markets won’t cool off entirely this year, affordable housing remains inaccessible for many. Campbell is concerned that in the current market conditions, some new buyers are still purchasing above what they can afford. In the event of a interest rate rise, she says that those who’ve bought beyond their means could be on a course for financial hardship.

“Even a quarter point could result in immediate financial discord for a family that has really bought at the top of their income,” says Campbell.

Heath has worked with a number of clients, who, after several years of house poorness, have not been able to efficiently save for retirement. In order to recoup their losses, Heath says that house poorness has forced some homeowners to make downsizing an inevitable part of their financial plan. He fears that those overpaying in today’s market will follow the same fate.

“Particularly if and when home interest rates rise, mortgages payments will rise accordingly,” says Heath. “I worry that you’ve got a whole generation of young people who may be putting a lot of their retirement plans into their home as opposed to saving in a traditional manner.”

Preventing house poorness starts with buying at the bottom of the market, where the prices are the lowest, but Campbell adds that it also requires ignoring the pressures of needing to buy right now — home prices may decline further yet. By monitoring the price of homes in the markets in which you want to buy, you’ll build your knowledge of a fair evaluation of prices in your desired area and skip overpaying, Campbell explains.

“Even if you want to buy a house a year from now, start doing your research now,” she says. “Know what the real cost of housing in the area you want to buy is so you can make sure you’re evaluating the houses that are up for sale with experience.”

Taking on a smaller mortgage loan may also prevent house poorness, especially in the event of an unexpected income change. Borrowing under the maximum amount a mortgage lender approves you for, Heath says, leaves a good buffer in your financial budget in case any unanticipated changes should occur.

“I think it’s a really good lesson to people before they buy to appreciate that job loss happens, health issues happen,” says Heath. “There are extraordinary financial situations that you may not be able to anticipate that could put you into difficulty if you bite off more than you can chew in the first place.”

Skip the McMansion — think long term

Like we keep a spare tire in the event of a flat, or a box of bandaids for those little accidents, avoiding house poorness requires establishing some safeguards in case of unforeseen circumstances. This means having a well thought out financial budget, and a good cushion of emergency funds.

When it comes to budgets, Heath says it takes a very personalized approach to get it right. The mortgage stress test does not factor in personal spending, so financial budgets for homeownership should reflect your own spending habits and expenses.

“The mortgage qualification process does not take into account things like your discretionary spending or the activities that your children are enrolled in, for example,” says Heath. “You can have two families with the same income and the same mortgage approval, but spend very different amounts of money month to month on housing related stuff.”

Beyond budgets, Campbell says it’s also important to account for the long-term lifestyle you’ll want under your mortgage. Owning a home in your early thirties with no children will mean different financial priorities compared to your late forties with post-secondary education fees and retirement in mind. It’s important that your mortgage accommodates your long-term savings and planned changes to family and income. Campbell says this starts with sticking to a budget.

“You don’t need the McMansion,” she says. “A lot of people think the bigger the house, the better it is and a lot of people regret that. So make sure that it’s within the budget that you have within an emergency fund that you need to develop around that budget and you’re able to do the things that you’ve wanted to do over time that won’t be impacted by the decisions you make with that home.”

Don’t give up everything

Owning a home ain’t cheap: there’s renovations, regular maintenance, seasonal upkeep and at least one emergency repair that you’ll need to fork out for at some point. Heath says that new home buyers tend to overlook these expenses — but they are critical to account for in any homeowner budget.

“I think it’s really important to, either on your own or with a professional, to try to assess what the true homeownership cost is going to be in that home,” says Heath. “Particularly, if you’re moving from a condo into a house, or from a rental into a homeownership position.”

Failing to accommodate regular home upkeep and extra costs in the budget can skew the true cost of homeownership. It can also be a drain on your finances. House poorness is marked by a lack of disposable income, which not only leads to skipping those needed repairs, but also the inability to go out and enjoy living life.

“People will often say, ‘We’ll give up everything to buy this house,’ but everything gets really boring very fast to have given up everything,” says Campbell.

Heath recommends making a detailed budget for the medium- to long-term financial outcomes of buying a home in order to assess true ownership costs.

Breaking up is hard to do

If you’re in a position of house poorness, don’t give up — there are options.

Campbell says that boosting your income is a good first step. You can do this by getting a part-time job, or creating side hustle from your home by renting out your extra rooms on Airbnb. But, if your mortgage payments have simply become too much, Heath says that you may need to consider selling and downsizing.

“There are situations where people need to consider the home that they own and whether it is too expensive,” he says.

If selling is the last resort, Campbell advises not to do so hastily. While there could be a mounting urge to get cash — and fast — selling quickly could cost you value in your home.

“Don’t wait until you really hit the dirt, and then try to sell your house, because chances are you’re going to have to sell it very quickly, and if you need to sell it very quickly, you’ll probably going to sell at a lower rate than you wanted to get,” says Campbell.

© 2019 BuzzBuzzHome Corp.

Vancouver homebuilders to delay new condo launches during normally-busy spring season as housing slump intensifies

Monday, March 11th, 2019

MLA sees a slowdown in townhouse construction

Josh Sherman
other

Spring — a time of warmer weather, blooming flowers and a fresh crop of condo launches for homebuyers to choose from.

Normally, at least. But a real estate marketing and analysis firm predicts some homebuilders are going to hold off on launching new developments during the normally busy spring real estate market.

“We expect to see a number of developers delay their planned spring launches for more favourable conditions,” says Suzana Conclaves, chief advisory officer and partner at MLA Canada, whose February 2019 Pre-Sale Real Estate Insights report includes the prediction.

By the end of March, MLA anticipates developers will have brought about 620 new pre-sale units to market in wood-frame, concrete and townhome developments across five developments in Greater Vancouver and the Fraser Valley, down sharply from 1,144 in February, when eight projects began selling.

Of the February tally, 15 percent have sold so far, and inventory is piling up. To date, approximately 14,000 pre-sale homes have been launched this year, and more than 5,800 of them are still available. Commentary from MLA suggests this isn’t a bellwether of a price crash, although developers are offering incentives to homebuyers in an effort to move more units.

“Despite this currently available inventory, market fundamentals with regards to population and job growth are indicating that upward pricing pressure on our housing market will continue in the long run,” the MLA report reads. “Buyers have simply adopted a wait and see attitude at this point in time.”

The majority of units in the pipeline this month are expected to be within concrete buildings, which are typically high-rise towers but can also be five- to six-storeys tall. MLA predicts a total of 545 units of this type will be released this month for pre-sale, meaning homebuyers can enter into an agreement to purchase them upon completion.

In wood-frame buildings, which are generally four- to six storeys in height, 40 units are on the way, while 35 townhomes will be available as well.

“With historical high land costs, construction costs which have not adjusted yet and a myriad of city fees, taxes and policy changes, many projects are currently not viable and we will continue to see housing starts decline,” Conclaves adds.

Declining housing starts, which are measured by when developers begin construction work on a project, are part of a broad national trend recently highlighted in a BMO note to clients.

“Residential construction, which remained firm through much of last year, has shown signs of slowing with the double whammy of tougher mortgage rules and poor affordability in major markets,” wrote BMO Chief Economist Douglas Porter in the note.

Of course, rough winter weather in major markets hasn’t helped either, and with spring right around the corner, Vancouver is still getting snowfall warnings.

© 2019 BuzzBuzzHome Corp.