Archive for June, 2019

BC leads permits to record high but there’s a good reason why

Tuesday, June 11th, 2019

Canadian municipalities issued a record high of building permits in April

Steve Randall
REP

Canadian municipalities issued a record high of $9.3 billion worth of building permits in April.

British Columbia led the gains with builders keen to beat the rise in development costs being introduced in Metro Vancouver the following month; but there were gains for six provinces overall.

Statistics Canada says that the national gain of $1.2 billion in April was the largest monthly gain since May 2007.

For the residential sector, multifamily permits saw a 24.5% rise to $5.9 billion in April, while the single-family sector gained 5.1% to $2.2 billion.

British Columbia contributed $2.4 billion to the national total, with multifamily gaining $880 million in the Vancouver CMA alone.

Ontario led the gain for single-family with a $67 million increase but Quebec posted the largest overall decrease, of $147 million.

Non-residential

For the non-residential sector, there was a 1.1% increase in permits issued compared to the previous month.

That means an April total of $3.4 billion, with industrial building intentions gaining across nine provinces. A food processing plant in the London CMA accounted for much of this.

Following a strong March, institutional and commercial permit issuance was lower in April.

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

CRA issues warning about real estate investment schemes

Tuesday, June 11th, 2019

Tax write-offs by investing in real estate is illegal

Steve Randall
REP

A warning has been issued regarding investment schemes that promise tax write-offs by investing in real estate through limited partnerships.

The Canada Revenue Agency said Monday that promoters including some tax representatives and tax preparers are claiming that investors can get write-offs of more than double the amount they invest in real estate.

These schemes claim that the significant tax benefit is due to the expenses incurred during the first year of investment.

As an example, an investor investing $5,500 may be promised a tax write-off of $12,500 due to financial services, lease enhancement, and tenant improvement costs in the first year.

This, the CRA warns, is not the case.

The agency clarifies that, although limited liability partnerships offer some of the benefits that apply to partnerships and corporate entities, any write-offs are limited to the amount invested.

Investors who chose to participate in these tax schemes, along with those that promote them, can face serious consequences including fines or even jail.

The CRA is advising investors to seek professional advice before investing, especially where deals appear too good to be true.

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Crypto Exchanges Are Facing Their Biggest Regulatory Hurdle Yet

Tuesday, June 11th, 2019

Olga Kharif
Bloomberg

Bitcoin and its fellow cryptocurrencies have surged in popularity partly because they’ve offered a way to skirt the government oversight exercised over traditional financial systems. Well, get ready to kiss much of that autonomy goodbye.

On June 21, the Financial Action Task Force — a multi-government effort that develops recommendations for combating money laundering and financing of terrorism that’s followed by about 200 countries including the U.S. — will publish a note to clarify how participating nations should oversee virtual assets, FATF spokeswoman Alexandra Wijmenga-Daniel said in an email. The new rules will apply to businesses working with tokens and cryptocurrencies, such as exchanges and custodians and crypto hedge funds.

Much depends on how the rules — long governing traditional bank wire transfers — will be interpreted and applied by country-specific regulators, but they are “one of the biggest threats to crypto today,” Eric Turner, director of research at crypto researcher Messari Inc., said in an email. “Their recommendation could have a much larger impact than the SEC or any other regulator has had to date.”

The guidelines will require companies ranging from exchanges Coinbase Inc. and Kraken to asset manager Fidelity Investments to collect information about customers initiating transactions of over $1,000 or 1,000 euros, as well as details about the recipients of the funds, and to send that data to the recipient’s service provider along with each transaction.

While that may sound simple, compliance will be costly and technically difficult, said John Roth, chief compliance and ethics officer at Seattle-based exchange Bittrex, which has about $58 million in daily-trading volume. After all, wallet addresses on digital ledgers supporting cryptocurrencies are largely anonymous, so an exchange currently has no way of knowing who the recipient of the funds is.

“It’s either going to require a complete and fundamental restructuring of blockchain technology, or it’s going to require a global parallel system to be sort of constructed among the 200 or so exchanges in the world,” Roth said. “You can imagine difficulties in trying to build something like that.”

A handful of U.S. exchanges are discussing how to set up such a system, said Mary Beth Buchanan, general counsel at San Francisco-based Kraken, which does about $195 million in daily volume.

“Without enhanced technology systems, this is a case of trying to apply 20th-century rules to 21st-century technology,” Buchanan said. “There’s not a technological solution that would allow us to fully comply. We are working with international exchanges to try to come up with a solution.”

The end result could be that many crypto businesses will face increased compliance costs, Buchanan said. Some non-compliant businesses could shut down, said Phil Liu, chief legal officer at Los Angeles-based hedge fund Arca.

“People in crypto like to make a big deal about giving personally identifiable information to the government, but I don’t see a whole lot of disruption for legitimate players if the proposal is enacted,” Liu said in an email.

U.S. exchanges may also lose customers, as instead of going through an exchange or another virtual-asset service provider (VASP), some may simply start trading with others directly, to safeguard their privacy.

“I get why the FATF wants to do this,” Jeff Horowitz, chief compliance officer at San Francisco-based Coinbase, the largest U.S. crypto exchange. “But applying bank regulations to this industry could drive more people to conduct person-to-person transactions, which would result in less transparency for law enforcement. The FATF really needs to consider the many unintended consequences of applying this specific rule to VASPs.”

Just how soon these consequences start to hit home will depend on the individual agencies. Groups like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) are expected to start to vigorously enforce the rules. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) recently issued interpretive guidance that looks similar to those being considered by FATF. Some state agencies could follow suit, raising the risk that non-compliant businesses will lose money-transmitter licenses.

If a country doesn’t comply with FATF rules and is placed on its blacklist, “it can essentially lose access to the global financial system,” said Jesse Spiro, head of policy at crypto investigative firm Chainalysis Inc.

The proposed regulations could also impact many of the more than 500 crypto funds that have popped up in the past few years, according to Josh Gnaizda, chief executive officer of CryptoFundResearch. “Trading delays or additional transactional costs as a result of compliance with FATF could significantly chip away at returns.”

After multiple meetings with the crypto industry, the regulators likely know compliance will take time, as the industry mulls new technologies and processes. Some participants are looking at the bright side, as greater oversight could lead to more institutional acceptance of crypto.

“Will it be a potential hardship? Certainly, at least initially,” Chainalysis’s Spiro said. “While it may be a hardship, it seems to be something that’s necessary. The road map at the end of the day after this is less arduous for this industry.”

Copyright 2019 Bloomberg L.P

Beware of real estate investment schemes promising tax write-offs, warns CRA

Tuesday, June 11th, 2019

Fraudulent schemes lure investors with false promise of huge tax write-offs – and those who invest could face prosecution

Joannah Connolly
Western Investor

Canadians should beware of a spate of real estate investment schemes that falsely promise a significant tax write-off, according to a warning from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).

The federal taxation agency also warned that not only the promoters of such schemes, but also anybody who participates in them with the aim of reducing their tax burden, could face prosecution, fines and even jail time.

The schemes, which the CRA said are being promoted by some tax representatives and tax preparers, are claiming that those who invest in real estate through a limited partnership can get a tax write-off of more than double what was invested, with limited liability for the investor.

The CRA said, “Potential investors are advised that they can claim a significant tax write-off because of costs being expensed in the initial year of the project. For example, the investor has invested $5,500 and is advised that they can write it off on their taxes for $12,500 due to financial services, lease enhancement and tenant improvement costs expensed in the first year. This is not the case.”

It added, “Limited partnerships are unique arrangements that provide investors with certain benefits similar to partnerships and corporate entities. However, different than general partnerships, the investor’s liability is restricted to the amount they invested. Therefore, they cannot claim a higher tax write-off than invested.”

Promoters of such schemes are not the only people who could face fines and jail time. The CRA’s warning made it clear that investors’ actions in trying to avoid tax payments by investing in such schemes “may have serious consequences.”

The agency wrote, “Those who choose to participate in these schemes, as well as those who promote these schemes, face serious consequences, including penalties, court fines and even jail time.” 

The CRA said that any scheme that seems “too good to be true” should be reported to the agency. It also advised that anyone who thinks they may have unwittingly participated in such a scheme “should come to us to correct your tax affairs, before we come to you.”

Copyright © Western Investor

May housing starts cause for concern?

Monday, June 10th, 2019

CMHC says housing starts slowed in May

REP

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. says the pace of housing starts slowed in May.

The housing agency say the seasonally adjusted annual rate of housing starts slipped to 202,337 units in May, down 13.3 per cent from 233,410 units in April.

Economists on avearge had expected an annual rate of 205,000, according to Thomson Reuters Eikon.

The annualized pace of urban multiple-unit projects such as condominiums, apartments and townhouses fell 18.5 per cent to 141,851 in May while the pace of single-detached urban starts rose 1.8 per cent to 45,095.

Rural starts were estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 15,391 units.

The six-month moving average of the monthly seasonally adjusted annual rates was 201,983 in May compared with 205,717 in April.

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Market collapse appears less likely says RBC

Monday, June 10th, 2019

A market report from real estate boards recovery underway

Steve Randall
Canadian Real Estate Wealth

Last week’s market reports from real estate boards including those in Vancouver and Toronto show that there is recovery underway with even the tough market conditions in Vancouver suggesting a bottoming-out.

This is unlikely to end calls for the mortgage stress tests to be altered or scrapped, says RBC Economics’ senior economist Robert Hogue, but it should “quiet down critics fearing a market collapse.”

In his latest assessment of the Canadian housing market, Hogue says the rebound for Toronto sales in May (resales up 19% year-over-year) says more about weakness a year ago than market momentum, with seasonally adjusted figures pointing to stabilization rather than a surge.

And ‘back-of-the-envelope’ calculations on the slowing of declining resales in Vancouver (-6.9% year-over-year in May compared to -30% in April) show that resales increased by more than 25% month-to-month in May on a seasonally-adjusted basis.

“This is the strongest sign yet that the market isn’t spiraling out of control. In fact, we believe it indicates that a bottom has been reached,” writes Hogue.

The report also notes several other Canadian housing markets as showing encouraging signs.

May resales increased year-over-year in Victoria, Calgary and Ottawa—all implying moderate increases between April and May. Despite Regina posting a sizable drop, this followed a strong pick-up in April.

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Vancouver commercial investment is not having a good 2019 so far

Monday, June 10th, 2019

Commercial asset investment in Vancouver is weak

Ephraim Vecina
Canadian Real Estate Wealth

Aside from a surging office market, commercial asset investment in Vancouver has been weak so far this year, according to new research by Altus Group.

A total of 322 commercial transactions were completed in the market during the first quarter, shrinking by 49% annually. Altus Group director of data solutions Paul Richter noted that this was the lowest commercial volume seen in Vancouver in several years.

Only the city’s office segment experienced net gains in Q1 2019, with sales going up to 26 (from the 16 seen the quarter prior).

The retail sector suffered its second consecutive decrease in overall investment during the quarter to end up at 35 transactions worth $136 million.

Meanwhile, the industrial sector’s volume dramatically plunged by 54% year-over-year, ending up at $228 million. This was even more noteworthy considering that the sector enjoyed its all-time investment high during Q4 2018.

Residential land investment was at $446 million during Q1 2019. This was the segment’s first sub-$1-billion level seen in 13 quarters, and its lowest dollar volume since Q2 2014.

Altus warned that the Vancouver commercial segment’s condition over the past few years has been especially concerning.

“The lowest transaction volume since Q1 2013 is reflective of the gap between vendor and purchaser price expectations, the lack of product and has resulted in decreased market activity,” Richter explained.

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Down payments are the biggest fear for first-time buyers

Monday, June 10th, 2019

A poll showed that 57% of first time buyers concerned about the down payment

Steve Randall
REP

Having a sufficient down payment to afford the home they want is the largest concern of first-time buyers according to a new survey.

The poll of recent homebuyers by mortgage insurer Genworth Canada and real estate brokerage Royal LePage found that 57% of respondents nationwide ranked that as their top fear before buying their first home.

Those in Toronto were most concerned about their down payment power (68%) while Vancouverites were less so (58%). But in Montreal, even with home prices around a third of those in Vancouver, 60% were concerned that their down payment was too small.

“While interest rates remain historically low, it is not surprising that first-time home buyers in Montreal are increasingly concerned about their down payment,” said Phil Soper, president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage. “Montrealers have been watching home values escalate over the past three years. Many are wondering if they have time to grow their down payment or if they should get in the market now as prices continue to rise.”

First-time buyers are willing to trade space for a shorter commute with 48% preferring this while 32% want a larger home even if they have to travel further to work.

“Even in cities where first-time home buyers have to push themselves to get on the property ladder, cost isn’t the only consideration when buying a first home,” said Soper. “While some young people are relocating to more affordable cities, those who stay value shorter commutes and access to the benefits of city life.”

Paying low rents to the ‘rents One in four new homeowners had been living with their parents before buying their first home.

A similar share had been paying rent to their parents but 30% said the amount was below market rates.

As they were still at home, 17% said their parents had delayed downsizing and a further 15% said that wouldn’t happen until younger siblings leave the nest.

Regional findings Sixty per cent of respondents in Ontario expressed anxiety about their down payment stretching enough to get the home they wanted, compared to 68 per cent of respondents in Toronto.

“Buying a property can be stressful for anyone, but for first-time home buyers, the anxiety is magnified by the unknowns,” said Caroline Baile, broker, Royal LePage Your Community Realty. “A good starting place is to define your wishlist and focus on your priorities.”

Shorter commutes were valued more than square footage in Toronto as 59 per cent of respondents in the region preferred a more expensive and smaller home located closer to where they or their spouse work – the highest regional percentage in Canada.

“There is a large portion of first-time home buyers in Toronto who will sacrifice size for location. Time is important – as are childcare, schools, and proximity to work,” said Baile. “Sometimes that means purchasing a condo in the city within walking distance of work, or even living with parents a little longer to position themselves better to get the home they want.”

Thirty per cent of respondents in Ontario and 34 per cent in Toronto lived with parents or other relatives before buying their first home, surpassing the national average (25%).

QUEBEC Fifty-one per cent of respondents in Quebec (excluding Montreal) expressed anxiety about their down payment stretching enough to get the home they wanted, compared to 60 per cent of respondents in Montreal.

“While those who live in other parts of the province have the convenience of time and can shop around, we are seeing that first-time home buyers in Montreal are feeling the pressure to make quick decisions to enter the market,” said Dominic St-Pierre, vice president and general manager, Royal LePage, for the Quebec region. “Low inventory and high demand have encouraged an increase of multiple offers in the city in favour of more

experienced buyers. First-time home buyers have to be prepared and secure financing prior to making an offer, with a sufficient down payment and mortgage pre-approval if they are serious about a purchase.”

Nearly one quarter of Montrealers (23%) lived with family prior to buying their first home, compared to 16 per cent elsewhere in Quebec. Compared to the rest of the country, Quebec is the province with the most significant gap between the largest urban centre compared to the rest of the province when it comes to first-time buyers paying rent to their parents before purchasing their own home. Seventy-four per cent of respondents in Montreal said they did not pay rent to their family or relatives compared to only 53 per cent of Quebecers (outside Montreal).

BRITISH COLUMBIA Fifty-six per cent of respondents in British Columbia expressed anxiety about their down payment stretching enough to get the home they wanted, compared to 58 per cent of respondents in Vancouver.

“Early generational wealth transfer from downsizing Baby Boomers has given a financial boost to first-time home buyers,” said Adil Dinani, real estate advisor, Royal LePage West. “Despite some softening in prices, first-time home buyers are optimistic about the long term health of the region’s real estate market.”

Twenty-seven per cent of respondents in British Columbia lived with family before buying a home. Fifty-eight per cent of those living at home paid rent to relatives, and of those paying rent, 45 per cent paid below market rates.

Of the respondents who lived at home before buying, 14 per cent said that living at home delayed their parents’ decision to downsize.

Forty-six per cent of respondents in B.C. chose to buy a more expensive, smaller home located close to where they/their spouse worked compared to 54 per cent of respondents in Vancouver.

“There will always be an attraction to buy in the city centre. In Greater Vancouver, there are newly-developed urban amenities and transportation infrastructure that increase the desirability of homes outside the core,” said Dinani. “These high density hubs create opportunities for people who are new to the market; they can embrace urban living with more space and connection to transit.”

ALBERTA Forty-nine percent of respondents in Calgary expressed anxiety about their down payment to get the home they wanted, compared to 62 per cent elsewhere in Alberta.

Among Calgarians living with family before buying a home, 47 per cent said their parents did not have plans to later downsize. Twenty per cent of respondents said staying in the home did delay their parents’ decision to downsize while 31 per cent indicated they had siblings who would need to move before parents could downsize.

“There’s definitely more opportunity in Calgary,” says Corinne Lyall, broker and owner, Royal LePage Benchmark. “You have a larger population of younger people who are very career-focused, with more buying ability. There are also a number of Baby Boomers who are in a position to help their millennial children purchase their first home.”

Forty-two per cent of those surveyed in Calgary said their home location represents a similar commute for both spouses/partners, representing the highest percentage compared to other regions. The national average is 36 per cent.

ATLANTIC CANADA The Atlantic Canada region bucks the trend for anxiety in relation to their down payment. Fifty-four per cent of those surveyed said they were not worried about their down payment compared to 41 per cent nationally.

“Home prices are not outside the reach of younger Canadians in Atlantic Canada. We still see buyers getting help from ‘the bank of Mom and Dad’ but there’s fantastic affordability and opportunity here,” said Marc Doucet, broker of record, Royal LePage Atlantic.

Seventy-four per cent of those surveyed in Atlantic Canada rented before purchasing their first home. Twenty per cent of respondents in Atlantic Canada lived with family before buying a home; 54 per cent paid rent to relatives, while 17 per cent paid market rates. Among those respondents who lived at home before buying, 20 per cent reported their parents delayed plans to downsize until the respondents moved out of the family home.

PRAIRIES Fifty-seven per cent of first-time home buyers in the Prairie provinces were worried about their ability to get the home they wanted with their down payment.

When it came to proximity to work, 39 per cent of respondents in Manitoba and Saskatchewan preferred a relatively more expensive, smaller home in exchange for a shorter commute.

“Where you live dictates how you live,” offered Michael Froese, broker and managing partner, Royal LePage Prime Real Estate. “A lot of first-time home buyers are looking at their purchase not just as a home, but as an investment as well. When it comes to resale value, choosing a good neighbourhood is part of the decision. You can always improve the house; you can’t change the location. Good advice for new home owners is to budget for some renovation and repairs.”

Among those living with family before buying a home, 71 per cent said their parents did not have plans to later downsize. Thirteen per cent of respondents said staying in the home did delay their parents’ decision to downsize while 7 per cent indicated they had siblings who would need to move before parents could downsize.

Thirty-six per cent of respondents in the Prairies paid rent to families at below market rates before purchasing their own home, slightly higher than the national average of 30 per cent.

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Sotheby’s International Realty Canada franchise rights sold

Monday, June 10th, 2019

Peerage Realty partners acquire Sotheby’s international Realty Canada

Steve Randall
REP

The real estate-focused business of investment firm Peerage Capital is to acquire the franchise rights of Sotheby’s International Realty Canada.

Through a wholly owned subsidiary, Peerage Realty Partners will acquire the rights from a subsidiary of Dundee Corporation. The transaction is expected to close around May 17, 2019.

“With over $112 billion in global sales volume, 22,500 sales associates and 990 offices in 72 countries and territories worldwide, the Sotheby’s International Realty brand is the most talked about, written about, impactful residential real estate brokerage network in the world,” said Miles S. Nadal, Founder and Executive Chairman of the Peerage Capital Group.

The acquisition will boost Peerage’s footprint in the Canadian luxury real estate services market. It will add 540 agents and $5 billion in annual sales to Peerage’s total sales.

Change of leadership The deal means a change of leadership for Sotheby’s International Realty Canada with long-time Peerage executive Don Kottick becoming president and CEO.

Kottick is a director of the Canadian Real Estate Association.

“The Sotheby’s International Realty brand is the preeminent destination that attracts some of the best talent in the industry” he said. “Moving forward, our focus will be on enhancing agent productivity, client experience, operations and continuing to attract the elite of the industry. With Peerage’s support, we will uphold and strengthen our position as the leader in luxury residential real estate in Canada.”

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Vancouver’s luxury home market is very attractive because you can dump your money here and you pay a modest amount of property tax

Sunday, June 9th, 2019

Vancouver’s luxury market: ‘There’s something wrong with this picture’

Neil Sharma
Canadian Real Estate Wealth

Trying to put a positive spin on Vancouver’s luxury property prices—where a two-bedroom, 1,831 square foot condo costs $2,660,000—is a tall order.

Sure, in Monaco, a three-bedroom apartment in the District de Fontvieille will go for $14,897,938, and in Hong Kong a three-bedroom apartment on Kennedy Rd. goes for $13,635,200—making that downtown condo in Vancouver look like a bargain.

However, the population of Vancouver proper in 2017 was 675,218, and presuming it has hitherto increased, it will likely only be a marginal boost. Monaco’s population is considerably less, but it’s a known playground for the wealthy. In 2017, Hong Kong estimated its population was 7.392 million, so how does a two-bedroom unit go for over $2 million in Vancouver?

“[Comparing Vancouver to global markets] is totally incongruent,” said Robert Mogensen, a broker with The Mortgage Advantage. “Vancouver is a branch office city, not a head office city, for one thing. It’s not a central banking city like those other world cities, so to compare it is ridiculous. Is it a pleasant place to live? Yes. Is it great for proximity to the mountains for skiing, or for going golfing? Yes. But it’s still a branch office city.”

Point2 Homes recently made the comparison, and while it does have merit—Vancouver is a global real estate staple and prices are a relative bargain compared to those found in London, New York and Paris—it begs the question: Why are prices so expensive in a city with fewer than one million residents?

“Vancouver is very attractive because you can dump your money here and you pay a modest amount of property tax, and because you don’t work here you don’t pay our high income taxes. It’s perfect for someone looking to shelter their money in a safe place,” said Mogensen.

“There’s no reason for a city like Vancouver with a general population and income base here—I mean real Canadian income base—to have prices where they are. The average Canadian worker can’t afford to buy accommodations in Vancouver, and even well-heeled couples with two professional jobs are being forced to look at condos or, at best, townhomes because single-family homes are so far out of reach. There’s something wrong with this picture.”

To elucidate his point, Mogensen noted that a client of his is a doctor and, along with his wife, should be living in a Shaughnessy single-family home in West Vancouver, but instead lives in an eastside townhouse.

“If you have surgeons who can’t afford to live in the most desirable parts of a city, there’s something wrong with that.”

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd