Archive for the ‘Other News Articles’ Category

New shared workspace opens in Vancouver’s inner city

Monday, December 21st, 2009

Independent entrepreneurs can rent space for $200 per month

Gillian Shaw
Sun

“Co-working” and “hotdesking” are growing trends with companies that are abandoning high-priced real estate in favour of more practical — and less pricey — workspace solutions.

With inner-city Vancouver home to many independent tech and creative entrepreneurs, a newly opened shared workspace is a natural. It was created by Building Opportunities with Business, a non-profit aimed at supporting business development and job opportunities in the inner city.

High-ceilinged, spacious and located on the main floor of a building at 163 East Pender St., the shared open space gives tenants desk space, along with chairs, tables, couches and other furnishings that distinguish it from a less-inviting cubicle office. Art on the walls showcases local artists.

“If you are a creative person, you need a certain amount of energy. But you also need the ability to concentrate, and you need some peace,” said Lorraine Murphy, the night manager of the BOB space.

Murphy has been working out of cafes since another shared office, WorkSpace in Gastown, closed down earlier this year. “This has plenty of room. I like the fact we’ve got natural light with window seats. You can hang out with friends with a cafe or living-room kind of vibe in the front, and you can have your head down at a desk toward the back,” said Murphy.

“Co-working gives you that sort of energy without the chaos of a cafe.”

The shared workspace is only one initiative of BOB, which is also involved in job programs and an initiative to improve the facades of vacant storefronts in the Downtown Eastside and in Chinatown.

“We hope that this open shared work space can contribute to the revitalization of the inner city by providing a space for creative professionals to flourish, for ideas to percolate, to cross pollinate, for businesses to grow, a place where stuff gets done,” reads BOB’s announcement of the new shared workspace.

Wi-Fi, a fridge, microwave, filtered water cooler and secure bike storage round out the offerings that come at a flat rate of $200 a month.

“We’re looking for creative professionals, progressive thinkers, the socially responsible and ecologically conscious who want to be surrounded by others of like mind. Folks who want more than a cubicle and a 9-to-5, and dream of bigger things and a better Vancouver to call home,” reads the announcement by BOB.

For information on the newly launched centre, e-mail [email protected], or check the Building Opportunities with Business website at www.buildingopportunities.org.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Woodward’s reborn

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

London Drugs, Nesters open a new retail era in the Downtown Eastside

John Mackie
Sun

Photograph by: Bill Keay, Vancouver Sun, Vancouver Sun

HASTINGS STREET REVIVAL: The deli section in the Woodward’s Food Floor by Nesters Market. Photograph by: Bill Keay, Vancouver Sun

HASTINGS STREET REVIVAL: In the atrium, a giant photographic mural by artist Stan Douglas depicts the 1971 Gastown riot. Photograph by: Bill Keay, Vancouver Sun

HASTINGS STREET REVIVAL: The Woodward’s Project — which includes two condominium towers, stores and a campus of Simon Fraser University — is nearly complete at the corner of Hastings and Abbott streets in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. The complex’s London Drugs store, owned by Vancouver’s Louie family, has a long history in the area. Photograph by: Bill Keay, Vancouver Sun

The Downtown Eastside has been a retail no-man’s land for decades.

No more.

Last Tuesday, London Drugs quietly opened a new 27,000-square-foot store on Hastings near Abbott in the Woodward’s complex.

This coming Tuesday, Nesters Market opens a 15,000-sq.-ft. supermarket around the corner at Abbott and Cordova.

Almost 17 years after the Woodward’s Department Store closed, the long-awaited revitalization of the landmark site is finally taking shape.

Construction will continue for a few months, but bit by bit, what architect Gregory Henriquez calls “the most complicated mixed-use project in the history of Vancouver” is coming together.

The project’s two residential towers (43 and 32 storeys) are occupied. Workers are racing to put the finishing touches on Simon Fraser University’s School for the Contemporary Arts, which will relocate there. A spectacular Stan Douglas photographic mural recreating the Gastown riot of 1971 — specially commissioned for the project — is already up, although it won’t be officially unveiled for a bit.

London Drugs and Nesters are open, TD Canada Trust will open in January, and several smaller retail outlets — including a JJ Bean coffee shop, a “gastro-pub,” a pizza place, a dental office and a cigar shop — will be unveiled over the next couple of months.

Developer Ian Gillespie stressed retail in his pitch to develop the Woodward’s site.

“We thought what that neighbourhood needed was really strong tenants that had the ability to survive, to last through the good times and the bad times, and had the ability to pull lots of people into the area,” Gillespie said.

“What that area needs more than anything is people with money in their pockets going to buy their toilet paper, milk or batteries, or whatever.”

Gillespie thought London Drugs would be an ideal tenant, and pursued the chain.

“By coincidence, the Louie family [which owns London Drugs] has a long history in that part of town,” he said.

“To them it was a natural fit, to come back and do something. [But] I think the London Drugs people, to be frank … saw it as an obligation. They saw it as important for Vancouver to be there. Brandt Louie is not just the owner of London Drugs, he’s also the chancellor of Simon Fraser [University]. I don’t think that’s coincidental.

“They struggled, when you look at the demographics, [with] making that store make sense. But they bought into the vision that Woodward’s was going to make a real substantial impact on the neighbourhood.”

London Drugs president Wynne Powell concurs.

“We knew this was going to be a very tough construction job, and a very tough issue to turn around into a positive icon for Vancouver,” Powell said.

“But we felt that it was a socially responsible decision to support this initiative. Because if people like us don’t support it, how can we sit on the sidelines, complaining that the area isn’t up to what it could be? If we want it to be what it should be, we should be willing to participate.”

The London Drugs outlet is a little smaller than the norm, but offers all the merchandise and services normally available.

“It’s two floors, similar to Georgia and Granville,” Powell said. “The first floor has general merchandise and cosmetics, and a pharmacy with private medical consultation booths. The second floor [has] the technical [departments], photographic, audio/video, the computers and the one-hour photo.”

With London Drugs onside, Gillespie went looking for a grocery store. Nesters signed on about three years ago, and has really got into the heritage of the site: It will be selling reproductions of Woodward’s peanut butter and cottage cheese.

For the opening, Nesters will be bringing back Woodward’s legendary “$1.49 Day” sale. It has even licensed the old $1.49 Day jingle (“Dollar forty-nine day, Tuesday!”) to promote it.

It’s part of the fabric of this city,” said Laura Ballance, who is doing publicity for the Nesters opening. “It’s a tip of the hat to the history of this site, to start on a Tuesday and tie so much in on opening day.”

“We thought it would be a special touch for a special event,” said Sam Corea of Nesters.

Gillespie loves the way that Nesters has embraced the heritage of the old Woodward’s Food Floor, which may have been the most beloved department of the beloved store.

“The whole Pattison group [which owns Nesters] really took that project on,” Gillespie said.

“Jimmy [Pattison] took that project on very similar to Brandt, in that you probably couldn’t have had a pro-forma that you could have taken to the owner and said, this makes a lot of economic sense. You had to have a vision and say, ‘You know what, we really believe this is going to be a good long-term investment.’

“Jimmy had that same confidence in the project as us. We’ve done a lot of business together; he bought into it much the same way as Brandt did. This is a long-term deal.”

Nesters and London Drugs aren’t being entirely altruistic by locating at Woodward’s, of course. Several thousand people are expected to go through the site per day, once it’s all up and running.

“There will be 1,500 people living there,” Henriquez said.

“One thousand kids at the art school, 500 people working there, and about 2,000 people a day going to shop there.”

Henriquez said Woodward’s is a $300-million project. It includes three new buildings — the two residential towers on Cordova and a nine-storey building on Hastings — plus the restored six-storey heritage building at the corner of Hastings and Abbott, which dates to 1903.

There will be 736 housing units (536 condos and 200 non-market apartments), 60,000 sq. ft. of office space, and 54,000 sq. ft. of retail. Simon Fraser’s School for the Contemporary Arts will take up 120,000 sq. ft. of space, including five performance venues or theatres.

Gillespie said Woodward’s was a daunting project to do. “It probably amounts to 10 per cent of our company’s business, but probably 50 per cent of our company’s time.” But he thinks the end result is worth it.

“I think in the big picture, long-term, Woodward’s is going to turn out to be substantially better than we ever would have imagined it to be,” Gillespie said.

“The people that have moved into the building have really embraced what Woodward’s is all about. When we sold that project, we really tried to sell it to end users, not to investors and speculators. That turned out to be absolutely what that project and that neighbourhood needed. The people that bought into it knew that they were moving into an evolving neighbourhood, and an interesting neighbourhood.”

Indeed, he feels the Downtown Eastside is becoming the coolest area in town.

“The amount of cool new retail that is going into that area of town … if you’re a trendy restaurant looking for a new [location], you’re not looking anywhere else,” Gillespie said.

“If you’re a store selling interesting merchandise, that’s the area that you’re looking to. You’re not looking to anywhere else in Vancouver.”

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Virtual legal service helps slash costs

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

‘I was being nickelled and dimed to death’

Jim Middlemiss
Sun

Milestone and Ho with client Yale Holder (centre). Photograph by: Tim Fraser, National Post

Yale Holder had enough of large legal bills, after his law firm sent him an invoice for $10,000 in August. His company, in the startup stage, was being billed for every little call.

“I thought, we can’t survive this way. That’s when we started to look for another legal team.” The founder of myCellmy– TERM.com, a company that lets consumers propose their own cell-plan terms to wireless providers, ditched his large, full-service law firm and switched to a nimble, virtual firm of 19 lawyers.

By moving his legal business to Cognition LLP, Mr. Holder says he cut legal costs by an astounding 60%. “I was being nickelled and dimed to death.” Cognition is the brainchild of lawyers and neighbours Joe Milstone and Rubsun Ho.

About four years ago, they were “trying to figure out what we were going to do with the next chapter of our lives,” Mr. Ho said. Both men had recently left their employers.

Mr. Ho, who cut his teeth at a Bay Street firm, had been at a technology startup that raised $US60-million at the height of the tech boom.

Mr. Milstone had worked as an in-house lawyer at a couple of companies. Both were doing legal consulting.

They learned through their in-house experience just how much companies spend on legal bills and how much of that money was “wasted on stuff we shouldn’t be paying for,” Mr. Ho said.

Mr. Milstone said he realized just how few companies have the benefit of an in-house legal advisor and saw an opportunity.

“You either hire your own in-house counsel, which for most companies is totally not on the road map. Or you go with the traditional outside law firm model, which does not really get you the proactive internal advice you need and is prohibitively expensive. We felt we could do something to fill that gap.” The men also realized they could do it cheaper by not carrying the overhead of a traditional law firm.

They maintain a small office in Toronto off the Bay Street corridor and most of their lawyers work at the client’s site a few days a week or from their own home office. It allows the firm to reduce their fixed e xpenses. T he firm’s lawyers are based in Toronto, Ottawa and Waterloo, Ont.

“We have a team of people we can turn to,” Mr. Rubsun said, adding if the client needs expertise that is beyond its roster of legal talent, they know where to find it.

Mr. Holder said the firm operates like his own in-house counsel. “I can call them and don’t have to worry. “We’re a startup. I don’t have resources to hire [an in-house] lawyer. We call them our legal partners.” Mr. Milstone said about 75% to 80% of the firm’s business comes from growth companies like Mr. Holder’s.

Small and medium enterprises contribute more than half of Canada’s gross domestic product, and they employ about 64% of the country’s private-sector workforce, the firm said.

Mr. Milstone said “a lot of these companies – especially the ones that haven’t necessarily worked with in-house counsel – have a bit of an antiquated view of legal services and shunned it off.” They see it as a “necessary evil to do.” “We want to take the pain out of a company being able to access legal services.” The alternative is not pretty, he said. Companies “wing it.” For example, they try drafting their own licences for intellectual property and end up giving it away. “The risk-reward is not worth it,” he said.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

 

Temporary bylaw would expand liquor hours, ban some ads during Games

Friday, November 27th, 2009

Proposed changes, made after public backlash to original plan, go to city council Tuesday

Kelly Sinoski
Sun

Pubs and restaurants will be able to serve liquor on week nights just as they do on weekends — until 2 or 3 a.m. — under new bylaws proposed by City of Vancouver staff during the 2010 Olympics. Photograph by: Jenelle Schneider, Vancouver Sun

Olympic spectators will be able to drink alcohol at pubs and on patios late into the night seven days a week, make more noise and take a rickshaw down pedestrian corridors during the 2010 Olympic Games.

But those hoping to make a buck during the Games with illegal commercial advertising, street-vending without a permit in Olympic zones or sharing single-room hotels, will face a minimum $250 fine as the city ramps up its municipal ticket enforcement.

Those are just some of the temporary changes being proposed by City of Vancouver staff in a revised 2010 Olympic Winter Games bylaw that will go before city council Tuesday.

The bylaw, initially approved in July, proposes temporary adjustments to 10 city bylaws during the Games, including relaxing noise and liquor service hours and cracking down on illegal commercial advertising, graffiti and littering.

The changes arose after a public backlash over concerns that the bylaw would unfairly restrict freedom of political expression.

To resolve this, the city proposes to crack down only on commercial advertising.

It would have the power to remove illegal commercial signs — or ambush marketing — in as little as one day, if it has the owners’ consent or a court warrant.

The aim is to have the fines act as a deterrent to keep the city attractive to tourists and investors while ensuring the value of Games sponsorship.

“Someone can make a lot of money selling advertising for five days during the Games,” said Coun. Geoff Meggs.

“We want to make sure they won’t profit.”

Illegal non-commercial signs — including ones containing negative messages about the Games — would be removed under the existing bylaw process, which could take up to 30 days, unless they pose a safety risk.

Meggs said the initial bylaw was passed as an “insurance policy” but people were not satisfied with the city’s explanation at that time.

“Our intention is to be a good host for the Olympics. We have to be proactive in managing the Games properly,” he said.

“The city was never intending to kick down a door and take down a fridge magnet … or tear off their T-shirts. But obviously there was a concern.”

The proposed changes would see weekend liquor services for bars and restaurants seven days a week, meaning pubs and restaurants could be open until 2 or 3 a.m. from Feb. 8-28, although licensees will still need approval from the provincial liquor control branch.

The city has also proposed to amend the daytime noise bylaw between Feb. 11 and 28, coinciding with the torch relay and increased activity downtown, and to put into place a plan to quickly eliminate graffiti in high-visibility locations — at taxpayers’ expense — between Feb. 1 and March 28.

Twenty rickshaws would also be allowed on pedestrian corridors as an “additional sustainable transportation option,” complementing 60 pedicabs.

But they, along with the pedicabs, must have a permit or risk a fine.

About 60 city engineers, park rangers, fire officials and community service workers will be deployed to enforce city bylaws, including street advertising, street-vending without a permit and failure to clear snow and ice off the streets.

“The speed with which the city addresses bylaw violations during the Games will be critical to ensure safety and enjoyment of the residents and visitors,” according to the city report.

Meanwhile, the city suggests restricting the area of the security zone in Coal Harbour and increasing security around Robson Square, now the official provincial government venue. It will also permanently increase the fine for violations of the fire bylaw to a maximum of $10,000.

David Eby, executive director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Society, said he’s pleased with the changes although he’s concerned about the potential impact on street vendors and those setting up shelters along Hastings Street, which has been dubbed an Olympic zone.

“What we’re concerned about is the ability of people to hold signs and chant,” he said. “The Olympics are like any other day in Vancouver.”

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

City rescinds bylaw limiting alcohol at dinner

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Council hoped to target restaurants receiving many complaints by limiting alcohol to 50 per cent of bill

Richard J. Dalton Jr.
Sun

Vancouver restaurant owners will no longer face a strict limit on how much alcohol they can sell, city Coun. Heather Deal said Monday.

Council last week revised a recently enacted bylaw that limited alcohol to 50 per cent of a restaurant’s sales.

“It’s really refreshing to see a government change course, and then change course in a common-sense way,” said Ian Tostenson, president and CEO of the B.C. Restaurant and Foodservices Association.

The new bylaw requires the ratio of food to liquor sales to be “consistent with a restaurant use.”

It also says the restaurant must offer its full menu while alcohol is being served.

The previous bylaw, passed last month, limited alcohol to 50 per cent of a restaurant’s sales.

That bylaw was put in place so the city could target restaurants receiving many complaints, Deal said, adding the city never intended to go around checking receipts.

But the bylaw raised concerns that restaurants serving expensive alcohol would exceed the limit.

Tostenson said four people buying a plate of nachos and a glass of wine each would easily exceed the 50-per-cent limit.

Meanwhile, changes to liquor hours approved last month remain in effect. Restaurant owners can apply to extend their hours to serve alcohol until 1 a.m. on weekdays and 2 a.m. on weekends.

Previously, there had been a hodgepodge of liquor hours, the result of a city decision in 2003 to limit closing hours to midnight for new applicants but to allow existing licensees to retain their longer hours.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

B.C. estate law stops the dead from stiffing ungrateful kids

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

Ian Mulgrew
Sun

People might still believe it’s their estate and they’ll leave it to whom they please, but the law in B.C. says otherwise if you try to stiff your wife or kid.

There was talk of changing the unique way the province handles estate litigation as part of the latest omnibus amendments to our archaic death laws, but it went nowhere.

There was stiff opposition to bringing us into line with other provinces, the United Kingdom and the U.S. by eliminating the thrust of the Wills Variation Act.

One of the fears about changing the handling of estates was that in cultures where the son is revered as a veritable god, women would be routinely disinherited.

That can’t happen in B.C. right now.

Unlike those other jurisdictions, the century-old law we use for estate litigation comes from New Zealand rather than England.

Oddly, the debate is also occurring right now in the United Kingdom, where the issue (known as testamentary freedom) is a key concern as the country prepares for full integration with the continental community.

New Zealand was the first common law jurisdiction to seriously question and rein in the right to leave your estate to whom you pleased on the basis that the family had a right to be protected.

It passed the Testator’s Family Maintenance Act in 1900.

In the wake of the social reform movements that followed the First World War, B.C. adopted a similar statute with the same name and near identical provisions in 1920.

In England and the common-law jurisdictions such as America, that hasn’t happened to the same extent.

The liberty to dispose of your assets any way you like, as they are yours, remains a pretty fundamental bedrock idea.

In Europe, by comparison, most of a person’s estate is legally reserved for and divided equally among the surviving children.

Though some countries prohibit those who murder their parents from profiting, European nations make it illegal to disinherit children who disappoint.

Forget about leaving it all to Fido to make a point to the ungrateful progeny — the Europeans ensure they still receive their pound of your flesh.

But the rules also prevent parents from rewarding the worthy — say, the selfless daughter who forgoes her own pleasure for years to nurse an ailing mom or dad.

That’s what truly rankles the personal freedom crowd — merit gets a raw deal.

Some countries even allow what are called “clawbacks” — the ability of the heirs to retrieve assets sold by the deceased before their passing to frustrate the bureaucrats and feckless.

Last month the EU unveiled guidelines for those who have assets in more than one country — and talk about your Byzantine bureaucracy!

In Europe, the right of a child to inherit an equal share of a parent’s estate is seen as a basic human right, the English system an anachronism guaranteeing the outdated and fusty privilege of the first-born son.

The British can’t comprehend such concepts and are howling over the feared chaos of officials from Brussels trying to recover money from some U.K. charity.

The tradition of strong property rights and a free market economy drove the development of the common law, which itself is grounded in personal freedoms.

Both sides see the other system as unfair and perverse: An apparent dilemma between trampling personal freedom or accepting the worst of human caprice.

In the rest of common law Canada, which follows England, adult independent children have no claim on their parent’s estate unless they are in fact “dependent,” which usually means they cannot support themselves.

B.C. by comparison travels a kind of middle road that allows the courts to rectify wrongs. The rest of Canada should be following us, agrees Trevor Todd, the lawyer behind disinherited.com.

In the face of demands from a municipal building inspector, no one avoids the normal standards by proclaiming, “my home is my castle.”

Similarly in this day and age, no one should be allowed to treat their family unfairly by claiming that in death personal freedom gives them the right to act meanly.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Port Metro Vancouver’s next stop: up the Fraser River

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Fiona Anderson
Sun

The next route for expansion at Port Metro Vancouver is through the Fraser River, the port’s chief operating officer Chris Badger told an audience of mayors and municipal representatives at the Vancouver Board of Trade’s Metro forum on Thursday.

“Most people don’t realize this, but the Fraser River is as important to the economic well-being of Canada as the St. Lawrence Seaway,” Badger said.

In 2008, the St. Lawrence Seaway, which runs from the Atlantic Ocean through the St. Lawrence River to Montreal and into the Great Lakes, moved about 40 million tonnes of cargo. The Fraser River moved 30 million tonnes, Badger said. But the economic benefit of the tonnage moved through the Fraser River was in fact greater than its eastern counterpart, he said.

So the next stage of funding the port will be looking for will be to upgrade facilities along the Fraser, including replacing the 100-year-old New Westminster railway bridge.

“The bridge is at or near, or some people say beyond, sustainable capacity,” Badger said.

The goal is to have ships move goods further inland before transferring their cargo to trucks for the rest of the trip, reducing traffic congestion.

“We believe there is great potential for the Fraser River to become a more usable green highway,” Badger said. “Right now, economically it’s not there, and it will not replace trucks but we think there is opportunity for the future.”

While the opportunities aren’t there yet, “they certainly will be in the next 10 to 15 years,” he said.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

New tree-cutting bylaw may put you out on a limb for $10,000

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

Frank Luba
Province

Cutting down a tree in Vancouver without a permit could result in a fine of as much as $10,000 if a new bylaw being considered by city council is passed.

The bylaw is on the schedule for Thursday morning’s city services and budget committee to get more public input.

While the city has had a tree bylaw with permits and fines since 1994, recent changes to the city charter allow for the stiffer penalty. In addition to requiring the permit for trees with a diameter in excess of 20 centimetres, it also calls for a replacement tree to be planted.

The new bylaw makes it easier for inspectors to access private property, requires the tree permit to be posted during the tree’s removal and raises the fee by $2 to $59 and $168 for each additional tree in the same 12-month period.

Coun. Andrea Reimer backs the heftier fine.

“Trees are a very heated and emotional issue in Vancouver,” said Reimer. “The increase in the fine simply provides, hopefully, a much greater deterrent to people ignoring the bylaw.” There are tree bylaws all around the Lower Mainland with varying penalties.

A permit requirement in the District of North Vancouver, for example, extends to trees that are 75 cm in diameter. The fine for cutting without that permit is $250, but the district has the option of taking offenders to court for a penalty as high as $10,000.

Surrey‘s focus is on trees with a diameter in excess of 30 cm and it also requires permits — $59 for the first tree and $22 for each subsequent tree.

Fines in Surrey range from $1,000 to $2,000 and $10,000 for a significant tree registered with the city. [email protected]

© Copyright (c) The Province

Baja Hotel California the One & Only Hotel

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Other

Download Document

Real men sometimes need help

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

In these tough economic times, there are few role models to help men cope. So what’s a guy to do? Here’s what

Douglas Todd
Sun

Stu Hoover has seen first-hand the pressure, despair and repressed anger many men experience earning a living.

Hoover was having an after-work beer in a Calgary bar when two friends in the energy industry became embroiled in an intense “heart-to-heart” discussion about their difficult workplace.

Suddenly the conversation “literally exploded” and one of the friends punched the other in the face. The man who began the fight has never returned to his high-paying job, presumably out of shame. The beer-fuelled fight has also wound up in court.

“It was shocking. It was traumatizing,” says Hoover, 38, a trained economist who now lives in Vancouver. Hoover says many men move to oil-rich Alberta with one intention: to make as much money as they can for themselves and family.

To add to Calgary’s grim energy-industry reality, where many routinely bring home between $300,000 and $1 million a year, a few months after the barfight, Hoover was downsized out of his own job.

The bar battle was all the motivation Hoover needed to make the huge personal decision to say goodbye to other possibilities in the oil and gas sector and enroll last year in a University of B.C. counselling psychology master’s program.

Now Hoover is focusing on career-related men’s issues; or, as he says, “the place where economics meets psychology.”

Hoover believes his former friend “snapped” because, like many men, he was taking advantage of the numbing effects of alcohol to unload about his stress at work. But his deep-down pain was not being heard by his inebriated workmate.

Hoover knows things could have been different for his former colleagues. In the right context, he has come to learn in the past year or so that men can be there for other men, with, or especially without, alcohol.

After exploring profound personal changes in recent years, Hoover is joining other B.C. men in developing what might be considered a new kind of men’s movement, which is a little different from the one associated with poet Robert Bly in the 1980s and ’90s.

The time is more than right for men to learn how to back each other up, Hoover believes. The ceaseless pressure that men are feeling to keep themselves, spouses and children living in the “style to which they’re accustomed” has become more intense during this economic crisis.

Many have been calling it a “mancession.”

The word has been coined because this recession is hitting North American and European male workers far harder than female employees.

Jobs in the male-majority industries of construction and manufacturing have been flying out the door to low-wage countries, while female-dominated spheres such as health care, education and the public service have not been pummelled to the same degree.

As Hoover and anyone who understands males will say, there is no quicker way for most men to lose their identity — their sense of self-worth, their essential masculinity — than to be dumped out of a money-earning job. They feel like failures.

LOSING THEIR LIVELIHOODS

With Statistics Canada reporting this year that men are losing their livelihoods at four times the pace of women, some health care agencies are reporting that devastated men, their all-important “provider” image in shreds, are looking for someone to talk to.

Traditionally, men have had a great deal of trouble seeking help after losing a job or enduring other crises. In times of emotional chaos, the standing North American statistic is that, while one in three women seeks some sort of counselling, only one in seven men does.

How can battered men find hope?

In the midst of the “mancession,” some are making headway in responding to fellow males who are struggling with all kinds of downturns in their lives.

Innovative psychotherapists at the University of B.C. and throughout Metro Vancouver have been taking the lead in providing a safe place for men to air their sorrow and dreams: in the company of other men.

Hoover has worked in various ways with UBC educational psychology professor Marvin Westwood and Dr. David Kuhl, who also works for Providence Health Care.

They are coming up with a new vocabulary, sometimes literally, to help men better understand and support each other.

Over the years, Westwood and Kuhl have led more than 50 workshops for men everywhere from Bowen Island to the Rocky Mountains. Participants have ranged from grandfathers to young male adults.

Westwood and Kuhl recognize it can be a tough time to be a man these days, especially in a harsh economy.

While jobs for traditional male “breadwinners” are increasingly under threat — and women now make up half the workforce in North America — the gender balance in higher education has shifted, leaving many men off balance.

Men are wondering, Kuhl says, how they fit in as “minorities” in academia, where roughly 60 per cent of those enrolled in most Canadian undergraduate, graduate and professional schools are now female.

Larry Green, a Vancouver therapist who has specialized in working with older and especially younger men, says some women have long had to endure being treated as “sex objects.”

But men, more subtly, have unconsciously been treated by the culture as “success objects,” valued mainly for their ability to be productive: providers who put food on the table.

With this recession highlighting how the economy may be slowly shifting against men, their upheaval is exacerbated.

To add to the crisis, North American culture continues to fail to offer up many models for what it means to be a healthy male.

The mass media and entertainment industries are full of destructive and contradictory images, ranging from men as helpless buffoons to men as unfeeling action figures.

There are few models of manhood embodying strength and integrity.

WHERE TO GO FOR SUPPORT

Do real men work out problems on their own?

Or is their somewhere they can go for support?

Westwood, 65, and Kuhl, 55, are finding that most men — just as they are quick to physically lend a hand to men on a sports team or to build a garage — also give a damn about the inner pressures on their fellow male travellers.

“Men want to help other men,” says Westwood. In an environment that guarantees confidentiality and safety, he says they can easily learn how to be there at an emotional level for other men.

“Men don’t want to be coddled by other men. They just want to be seen for who they are. And as they tell their stories, they can be more honest about how they experience life,” Westwood says.

Canadian men looking for mutual support are finding something different than they did in the 1990s, when Bly, the acclaimed American poet and author of the best-seller, Iron John, was leading the so-called “mytho-poetic” men’s movement.

It emphasized literature, psychological archetypes and wilderness retreats as paths to men’s wholeness.

Bly often talked about how crucial it was for men to come together over their “grief,” to regret those things they never got in a society that values them mostly for work and winning.

What is different about men’s psychological efforts in the 21st century?

Westwood, Kuhl, Hoover and colleagues have worked with high-flying executives, lawyers, police officers, health care workers, clergy, teachers, professors and more.

They have a particular specialty in lending a hand to Canada’s battle-worn soldiers, the kind of guys our culture often refers to as “men’s men.”

The men’s group leaders are coming to understand the kinds of approaches that leave men feeling cold and isolated or, alternatively, light them up.

They’re even finding out which words work for men and which don’t. They’re developing a new vocabulary for men.

For instance, the men’s group leaders don’t talk about men becoming more “sensitive.”

Men aren’t drawn to that, and neither, really, are most women. “Sensitive” men are associated with soft ones, even wimps, who don’t stand up for anything.

Instead, Westwood, Kuhl and those who co-lead groups with them, talk about men who are “honourable.”

DEFINING ‘HONOURABLE’

An honourable man, they say, is honest, including about himself. “He knows his strengths and weaknesses.”

An honourable man is not afraid to combine “vulnerability and competency.” An honourable man is willing to be unpopular.

The 20th-century call for men to share their “feelings” has also worn a bit thin these days.

Instead, Westwood and Kuhl urge men to “express” themselves or, better yet, tell their “story.”

The new lexicon goes on. Rather than suggesting men follow their “intuition,” for instance, they’re encouraged to trust their “gut.”

These B.C.-based men’s group leaders don’t even necessarily ask men to “support” each other either. Instead, they talk about providing each other with “backup.”

Nor do they overuse the popular word, “healing.”

The workshop leaders find many men respond better to expressions such as “repairing,” “recovering,” “rebuilding,” “getting themselves back” or even “dropping their baggage.”

In the midst of this so-called “mancession,” Westwood and Kuhl are finding other words that men often need to hear in hard times.

They’re helping men “label” their strong emotions, which can so often be “awkward.”

Says Kuhl: “It’s okay in our culture for men to be ‘angry’ and ‘mad,’ but not so much ‘sad.’ “

But unacknowledged “sadness” and “hurt” are often at the root of anger. And so is the emotion that is really anathema for men to admit: “Fear.”

Why do men so often turn to rage in their workplaces?

“Men are very loyal,” Kuhl answers.

They find it normal to sacrifice themselves for others.

Men learn through team sports, group-oriented vocations (such as construction, mining and police work) and especially the military that they must never be disloyal.

So when their company starts handing out pink slips during an economic downturn, men, even more than women, Kuhl says, “feel betrayed.”

They not only lose their income, “they tell us they lose a part of themselves,” Kuhl says. “They feel devalued. And they miss the sense of belonging, of being ‘with the boys,’ which can add to feelings of alienation.”

When the workplace going gets really rough, many men who don’t have other men to back them up succumb to loneliness and despair as well as addictions, especially to drugs and alcohol.

It’s often not useful when men share their pain while drinking heavily, says Hoover, who saw its disastrous effects in a fateful evening in a Calgary bar.

“They drink so they’ll feel more comfortable talking. It eases the anxiety of sharing their stories. But they don’t really feel heard,” says Hoover.

“And, even if they’ve had a meaningful conversation, they often later forget what was said. There is no emotional memory when you’re inebriated.”

Separate from drugs and alcohol, what about the other common way men in trouble have for finding support: through women?

THE DOUBLE BIND

What can the women who love men do to help their struggling partners, relatives, friends and sons? Not as much as many might think.

Spouses of men are often in a double bind, says Kuhl. When men express sadness and hurt, many women want to take care of them.”But,” Westwood says, “women can’t be both partners and helpers to men.”

To a greater extent than many have been thinking in recent decades, Westwood believes men have to connect with each other to rebuild themselves.

North American society lacks decent male initiation rites.

As a result — paradoxically, Green says — it is often the personal crisis of a job loss, divorce, or bankruptcy that tosses many men into what he calls “an unconscious rite of passage.”

WHAT’S A HEALTHY MALE?

“We’re suddenly thrown into a strange and alien situation, in which we don’t know if we’re going to survive or not.”

Rather than giving up on themselves, as many older men do, Green, 66, urges men to seize on a personal calamity to take a “hero’s journey” and discover “their own truths.”

Since our culture does not offer many models about what it means to be a healthy male, Green says men going through job or other crises soon learn “they can’t just get their identity off the rack. They have to design their own clothing.”

Green, Kuhl, and Westwood are convinced one of the best ways for men to restore themselves to health is with the help of a community of emotionally courageous men.

Most men, especially firefighters, soldiers, tradesmen and police, find it easy to be physically brave, says Green. But many men tend to be more awkward about feelings. Still, Green has seen emotional bravery when he has worked as a therapist with groups of Metro Vancouver firefighters.

“They always honoured the guy who jumped into the emotional fray,” Green says. The firefighters were in “awe” of colleagues who were willing to go to deep emotional places.

Bly had it right when he said that struggling men can be restored when they come together in shared grief to tell their often-difficult stories of feeling trapped, devalued or half dead. Many believe it’s best if alcohol isn’t a big part of it.

If the sad, angry professional men who fell into a savage fight in a Calgary bar had the chance to honestly talk about their soul-destroying vocational pain without using alcohol, Hoover thinks the outcome could have been much more transformative.

Even in this gender-confused culture and often-cruel economy, real men don’t have to be one-dimensional; they don’t have to choose between being either hyper-competitive “success objects,” or so-called “Sensitive New Age Guys (SNAGs).”

There are at least a few well-known male role models in North America other men could look up to.

Former Canadian general Romeo Dallaire, who overcame post-traumatic stress disorder to champion human rights, could be one of them, say Kuhl and Westwood. They also name international AIDS activist Stephen Lewis. Both men have “stood alone” for justice and the dignity of their fellow humans.

REAL MEN OUT THERE

Perhaps even U.S. President Barack Obama, says Westwood, could be on the list of high-profile men who could serve as models. After all, the U.S. leader is in the fight of his country’s life for global disarmament and medical care for all.

Maybe Dallaire, Lewis and Obama are not as unique as our culture thinks, however. As Westwood et al suggest, there could be many more real men out there than is normally believed; honest men leading honourable lives.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun